Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Wavefunctions interaction correlation

For separable initial states the single excitation terms can be set to zero at all times at this level of approximation. Eqs. (32),(33),(34) together with the CSP equations and with the ansatz (31) for the total wavefunction are the working equations for the approach. This form, without further extension, is valid only for short time-domains (typically, a few picoseconds at most). For large times, higher correlations, i.e. interactions between different singly and doubly excited states must be included. [Pg.372]

The most commonly employed tool for introducing such spatial correlations into electronic wavefunctions is called configuration interaction (Cl) this approach is described briefly later in this Section and in considerable detail in Section 6. [Pg.234]

The twin facts that heavy-atom compounds like BaF, T1F, and YbF contain many electrons and that the behavior of these electrons must be treated relati-vistically introduce severe impediments to theoretical treatments, that is, to the inclusion of sufficient electron correlation in this kind of molecule. Due to this computational complexity, calculations of P,T-odd interaction constants have been carried out with relativistic matching of nonrelativistic wavefunctions (approximate relativistic spinors) [42], relativistic effective core potentials (RECP) [43, 34], or at the all-electron Dirac-Fock (DF) level [35, 44]. For example, the first calculation of P,T-odd interactions in T1F was carried out in 1980 by Hinds and Sandars [42] using approximate relativistic wavefunctions generated from nonrelativistic single particle orbitals. [Pg.253]

Figure 1. The shape of the potential curve for nitrogen in a correlation-consistent polarized double-zeta basis set is presented for the variational 2-RDM method as well as (a) single-reference coupled cluster, (b) multireference second-order perturbation theory (MRPT) and single-double configuration interaction (MRCl), and full configuration interaction (FCl) wavefunction methods. The symbol 2-RDM indicates that the potential curve was shifted by the difference between the 2-RDM and CCSD(T) energies at equilibrium. Figure 1. The shape of the potential curve for nitrogen in a correlation-consistent polarized double-zeta basis set is presented for the variational 2-RDM method as well as (a) single-reference coupled cluster, (b) multireference second-order perturbation theory (MRPT) and single-double configuration interaction (MRCl), and full configuration interaction (FCl) wavefunction methods. The symbol 2-RDM indicates that the potential curve was shifted by the difference between the 2-RDM and CCSD(T) energies at equilibrium.
In the last few years, the improvements in computer hardware and software have allowed the simulation of molecules and materials with an increasing number of atoms. However, the most accurate electronic structure methods based on N-particle wavefunctions, for example, the configuration interaction (Cl) method or the coupled-cluster (CC) method, are computationally too expensive to be applied to large systems. There is a great need for treatments of electron correlation that scale favorably with the number of electrons. [Pg.388]

In quantum chemistry, the correlation energy Ecorr is defined as Econ = exact HF- In Order to Calculate the correlation energy of our system, we show how to calculate the ground state using the Hartree-Fock approximation. The main idea is to expand the exact wavefunction in the form of a configuration interaction picture. The first term of this expansion corresponds to the Hartree-Fock wavefunction. As a first step we calculate the spin-traced one-particle density matrix [5] (IPDM) y ... [Pg.513]

A fruitful approach to the problem of intermolecular interaction is perturbation theory. The wavefunctions of the two separate interacting molecules are perturbed when the overlap is nonzero, and standard treatment [49] yields separate contributions to the interaction energy, namely the Coulombic, polarization, dispersion, and repulsion terms. Basis-set superposition is no longer a problem because these energies are calculated directly from the perturbed wavefunction and not by difference between dimers and monomers. The separation into intuitive contributions is a special bonus, because these terms can be correlated with intuitive molecular... [Pg.13]


See other pages where Wavefunctions interaction correlation is mentioned: [Pg.212]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.34]   


SEARCH



Correlated wavefunctions

Correlation wavefunctions

Wavefunction correlation

© 2024 chempedia.info