Wavefunction spin-orbital

The most usual starting point for approximate solutions to the electronic Schrodinger equation is to make the orbital approximation. In Hartree-Fock (HF) theory the many-electron wavefunction is taken to be the antisymmetrized product of one-electron wavefunctions (spin-orbitals) ... 

A Slater determinant is an antisymmetrized product of N one-electron wavefunctions spin orbitals). In this determinant, the columns are the one-electron wave functions while the electron coordinates are along the rows. 

A determinant is the most convenient way to write down the permitted functional forms of a polv electronic wavefunction that satisfies the antisymmetry principle. In general, if we have electrons in spin orbitals Xi,X2, , Xn (where each spin orbital is the product of a spatial function and a spin function) then an acceptable form of the wavefunction is ... 

In our treatment of molecular systems we first show how to determine the energy for a given iva efunction, and then demonstrate how to calculate the wavefunction for a specific nuclear geometry. In the most popular kind of quantum mechanical calculations performed on molecules each molecular spin orbital is expressed as a linear combination of atomic orhilals (the LCAO approach ). Thus each molecular orbital can be written as a summation of the following form ... 

VVc can now see why the normalisation factor of the Slater determinantal wavefunction is I v/N . If each determinant contains N terms then the product of two Slater determinants, ldeU rminant][determinant], contains (N ) terms. However, if the spin orbitals form an oi lhonormal set then oidy products of identical terms from the determinant will be nonzero when integrated over all space. We Ccm illustrate this with the three-electron example, k ljiiiidering just the first two terms in the expansion we obtain the following ... 

As illustrated above, any p2 configuration gives rise to iD , and levels which contain nine, five, and one state respectively. The use of L and S angular momentum algebra tools allows one to identify the wavefunctions corresponding to these states. As shown in detail in Appendix G, in the event that spin-orbit coupling causes the Hamiltonian, H, not to commute with L or with S but only with their vector sum J= L +... 

The essence of this analysis involves being able to write each wavefunction as a combination of determinants each of which involves occupancy of particular spin-orbitals. Because different spin-orbitals interact differently with, for example, a colliding molecule, the various determinants will interact differently. These differences thus give rise to different interaction potential energy surfaces. 

Such a compact MCSCF wavefunction is designed to provide a good description of the set of strongly occupied spin-orbitals and of the CI amplitudes for CSFs in which only these spin-orbitals appear. It, of course, provides no information about the spin-orbitals that are not used to form the CSFs on which the MCSCF calculation is based. As a result, the MCSCF energy is invariant to a unitary transformation among these virtual orbitals. 

Multiplying a molecular orbital function by a or P will include electron spin as part of the overall electronic wavefunction i /. The product of the molecular orbital and a spin function is defined as a spin orbital, a function of both the electron s location and its spin. Note that these spin orbitals are also orthonormal when the component molecular orbitals are. 

A more general way to treat systems having an odd number of electrons, and certain electronically excited states of other systems, is to let the individual HF orbitals become singly occupied, as in Figure 6.3. In standard HF theory, we constrain the wavefunction so that every HF orbital is doubly occupied. The idea of unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) theory is to allow the a and yS electrons to have different spatial wavefunctions. In the LCAO variant of UHF theory, we seek LCAO coefficients for the a spin and yS spin orbitals separately. These are determined from coupled matrix eigenvalue problems that are very similar to the closed-shell case. 

Suppose we have an HF determinantal wavefunction fi o constructed from singly occupied spin orbitals , (that is, a UHF wavefunction). Other... 

In the realistic case where the potential is spin-dependent, the spin-orbit method is in trouble (should the spin-orbit parameter be calculated with the up or the down spin potential ). The present formalism allows for the use of spin-dependent potential and wavefunctions. 

The left superscript indicates that the arrangements are all spin triplets. The letter T refers to the three-fold degeneracy just discussed and it is in upper case because the symbol pertains to a many-electron (here two) wavefunction (we use lower-case letters for one-electron wavefunctions or orbitals, remember). The subscript g means the wavefunctions are even under inversion through the centre of symmetry possessed by the octahedron (since each d orbital is of g symmetry, so also is any product of them), and the right subscript 1 describes other symmetry properties we need not discuss here. More will be said about such term symbols in the next two sections. 

The angular momenta of atoms are described by the quantum numbers L, S or J. When spin-orbit coupling is important, it is the total angular momentum J which is a constant of the system. A group of atomic wavefunctions with a common J value - akin to a term, as described in Section 3.6 - comprise (27 -i- 1) members with Mj... 

The basis for this formula is just the same as described above but, in this case, spin-orbit coupling admixes the higher-lying 2 2(g) term wavefunctions into the ground E(g). The coefficient 2 in Eq. (5.17) rather than the 4 in Eq. (5.16) arises from the different natures of the wavefunctions being mixed together. 

This kind of wavefunctions, in the complete Cl framework, as Knowles and Handy [16e] have proved feasible, for a system of m spin-orbitals and n ([Pg.238]

It should be pointed out that a somewhat different expression has been given for the Knight shift [32] and used in the analysis of PbTe data that in addition to the g factor contains a factor A. The factor A corresponds to the I PF(0) I2 probability above except that it can be either positive or negative, depending upon which component of the Kramers-doublet wave function has s-character, as determined by the symmetry of the relevant states and the mixing of wavefunctions due to spin-orbit coupling. 

Mean-Field Spin-Orbit Method Applicable to Correlated Wavefunctions. 

Sebastian has emphasized that (17a) implies Pi <0.5 (since 0restricted form the wavefunction (11) has when the a and / -spin orbitals are constrained to be equal. It can be circumvented by removing this constraint and using different spatial orbitals for electrons with different spin, which is accomplished by making different choices for the coupling functions. 

---