Wavefunction angular components

The tip structure does not enter in this theory explicitly. This is due to the assumption that the electronic structure of the tip is totally symmetric about the tip s apex. This is equivalent to saying that the electronic wave functions have angular components that only contain the spherical harmonic Yoo- This does not imply that the electrons of the tip s atoms are s-electrons. Indeed, one can have a tip made out of s-electrons, and the overall wavefunction has other spherical harmonics in their composition this is so because the spherical harmonics are centered about the tip s apex and not about each atom s center. 

A wavefunction ipis mathematical function that contains detailed information about the behaviour of an electron. An atomic wavefunction ip consists of a radial component, R r), and an angular component, A 9, p>). The region of space defined by a wavefunction is called an atomic orbital. 

TABLE 1.1 Angular Components of Some Common Wavefunctions... 

Since the radial and angular components are separable, the wavefunction will be a product of the angular function and a radial function, The... 

It should be mentioned that if two operators do not commute, they may still have some eigenfunctions in common, but they will not have a complete set of simultaneous eigenfunctions. For example, the and Lx components of the angular momentum operator do not commute however, a wavefunction with L=0 (i.e., an S-state) is an eigenfunction of both operators. 

Now assume that a subsequent measurement of the component of angular momentum along the lab-fixed z-axis is to be measured for that sub-population of the original sample found to be in the P-state. For that population, the wavefunction is now a pure P-function ... 

The theory behind body-fixed representations and the associated angular momentum function expansions of the wavefunction (or wave packet) in terms of bases parameterized by the relevant constants of the motion and approximate constants of the motion is highly technical. Some pertinent results will simply be stated. The two good constants of the motion are total angular momentum, J, and parity, p = +1 or 1. An approximate constant of the motion is K, the body-fixed projection of total angular momentum on the body-fixed axis. For simplicity, we will restrict attention to the helicity-decoupled or centrifugal sudden (CS) approximation in which K can be assumed to be a constant of the motion. In terms of aU its components, and the iteration number k, the real wave packet is taken to be [21]... 

The steps from Eq. (3.34) to Eq. (3.36) simply mean that for each component of the tip wavefunction with angular dependence characterized by landm, the tunneling matrix element is proportional to the corresponding component of the sample wavefunction with the same angular dependence. 

Apart of historical reasons, there are several features of the Dirac-Pauli representation which make its choice rather natural. In particular, it is the only representation in which, in a spherically-symmetric case, large and small components of the wavefunction are eigenfunctions of the orbital angular momentum operator. However, this advantage of the Dirac-Pauli representation is irrelevant if we study non-spherical systems. It appears that the representation of Weyl has several very interesting properties which make attractive its use in variational calculations. Also several other representations seem to be worth of attention. Usefulness of these ideas is illustrated by an example. 

Bound states are readily included in the line shape formalism either as initial or final state, or both. In Eq. 6.61 the plane wave expression(s) are then replaced by the dimer bound state wavefunction(s) and the integration(s) over ky and/or kjj2 are replaced by a summation over the n bound state levels with total angular momentum J n or J . The kinetic energy is then also replaced by the appropriate eigen energy. In this way the bound-free spectral component is expressed as [358]... 

An equivalent form is given by Englefield.11 It is possible to find quite a variety of phases for the transformation coefficients of Eq. (6.18).10-13 The phase depends on the phase conventions established for the spherical and parabolic states. The choice of phase in Eq. (6.18) is for spherical functions with an /, as opposed to (-r)e, dependence at the origin and the spherical harmonic functions of Bethe and Salpeter. A few examples of the spherical harmonics are given in Table 2.2. The parabolic functions are assumed to have an ( n) ml/2 behavior at the origin and an e m angular dependence. This convention means, for example, that for all Stark states with the quantum number m, the transformation coefficient (nni>i2m nmm) is positive. To the extent that the Stark effect is linear, i.e. to the extent that the wavefunctions are the zero field parabolic wavefunctions, the transformation of Eqs. (6.17) and (6.18) allows us to decompose a parabolic Stark state in a field into its zero field components, or vice versa. 

Physically, it means that it is possible to know simultaneously the square of the intensity of the spin angular momentum and its component along z. Since the spin wavefunctions are not eigenfunctions of the operators S or /, it is impossible to... 

We assume that each nucleon has a pseudo-spin i and pseudo-orbital angular momentum k. These couple to form the single particle angular momenta J,J (in [j]) of the two interacting nucleons. The wavefunction of a pair of nucleons coupled to a total angular momentum L (and z component p) is then given by ... 

In quantum mechanics, spin is described by an operator which acts on a spin wavefunction of the electron. In the present case this operator describes an angular momentum with two possible eigenvalues along a reference axis. The first requirement fixes commutation rules for the spin components, and the second one leads to a representation of the spin operator by 2 x 2 matrices (Pauli matrices [Pau27]). One has... 

Symmetry dictates that the representations of the direct product of the factors in the integral (3 /T Hso 1 l/s2) transform under the group operations according to the totally symmetric representation, Aj. The spin part of the Hso spin-orbit operator converts triplet spin to singlet spin wavefunctions and singlet functions to triplet wavefunctions. As such, the spin function does not have a bearing on the symmetry properties of Hso- Rather, the control is embedded in the orbital part. The components of the orbital angular momentum, (Lx, Ly, and Lz) of Hso have symmetry properties of rotations about the x, y, and z symmetry axes, Rx, Ry, and Rz. Thus, from Table 2.1, the possible symmetry... 

In Eqn. (5), the angular brackets impley averages over the asymmetric rotor wave-function as well as the vibrational wavefunction. Rz is the component of R along the space-fixed z-axis. The final step is to relate the coupling constants in Eqn. (5) to those of the monomer. In general, the expressions depend on the complexity of the monomers and on the dimer rotational state observed. For a large number of cases, a linear type dimer in a K=0 rotational state may be assumed, and Eqn. (5) may be expressed as... 

---