Wave function theory analogies

In perturbation theory one expands the energy and the wave function in analogy to equation (I) as... 

A few studies have found potential surfaces with a stable minimum at the transition point, with two very small barriers then going toward the reactants and products. This phenomenon is referred to as Lake Eyring Henry Eyring, one of the inventors of transition state theory, suggested that such a situation, analogous to a lake in a mountain cleft, could occur. In a study by Schlegel and coworkers, it was determined that this energy minimum can occur as an artifact of the MP2 wave function. This was found to be a mathematical quirk of the MP2 wave function, and to a lesser extent MP3, that does not correspond to reality. The same effect was not observed for MP4 or any other levels of theory. 

In developing perturbation theory it was assumed that the solutions to the unpermrbed problem formed a complete set. This is general means that there must be an infinite number of functions, which is impossible in actual calculations. The lowest energy solution to the unperturbed problem is the HF wave function, additional higher energy solutions are excited Slater determinants, analogously to the Cl method. When a finite basis set is employed it is only possible to generate a finite number of excited determinants. The expansion of the many-electron wave function is therefore truncated. 

Analogously to MP methods, coupled cluster theory may also be based on a UFIF reference wave function. The resulting UCC methods again suffer from spin contamination of the underlying UHF, but the infinite nature of coupled cluster methods is substantially better at reducing spin contamination relative to UMP. Projection methods analogous to those of the PUMP case have been considered but are not commonly used. ROHF based coupled cluster methods have also been proposed, but appear to give results very similar to UCC, especially at the CCSD(T) level. 

A theory for nonequilibrium quantum statistical mechanics can be developed using a time-dependent, Hermitian, Hamiltonian operator Hit). In the quantum case it is the wave functions [/ that are the microstates analogous to a point in phase space. The complex conjugate / plays the role of the conjugate point in phase space, since, according to Schrodinger, it has equal and opposite time derivative to v /. 

The power of quantum theory, as expressed in Eq. (4.1), is that if one has a molecular wave function in hand, one can calculate physical observables by application of the appropriate operator in a manner analogous to that shown for the Hamiltonian in Eq. (4.8). Regrettably, none of these equations offers us a prescription for obtaining the orthonormal set of molecular wave functions. Let us assume for the moment, however, that we can pick an arbitrary function,, which is indeed a function of the appropriate electronic and nuclear coordinates to be operated upon by the Hamiltonian. Since we defined the set of orthonormal wave functions 4, to be complete (and perhaps infinite), the function must be some linear combination of the 4>,, i.e.,... 

At the DFT level of theory, spin annihilation in principle has no analog, since the correct wave function for the KS density is not known (only the non-interacting KS wave function from which a portion of the kinetic energy is evaluated is known, see Section 8.3). However, Cramer et al. (1995) proposed a projected DFT (PDFT) procedure whereby the DFT energy... 

Table 1 shows the covalent and charge transfer (CT) structures (analogous to electronic configurations in MO theory parlance) that make up the VB wave function for the... 

Here, we seek to obtain wave functions - molecular orbitals - in a manner analogous to atomic orbital (AO) theory. We harbour no preconceptions about the chemical bond except that, as in VB theory, the atomic orbitals of the constituent atoms are used as a basis. A naive, zeroth-order approximation might be to regard each AO as an MO, so that the distribution of electron density in a molecule is simply obtained by superimposing the constituent atoms whose AOs remain essentially unaltered. But since there is inevitably an appreciable amount of orbital overlap between atoms in any stable molecule - without it there would be no bonding - we must find a set of orthogonal linear combinations of the constituent atomic orbitals. These are the MOs, and their number must be equal to the number of AOs being combined. 

The theory of the model system for crystal excitation is analogous to molecular-orbital theory. The localized wave functions (5) and (6) can be written in alternative forms (7) and (8), which... 

As an approach analogous of nonrelativistic Hartree-Fock theory, the four-component Dirac-Hartree-Fock wave function is described with a Slater determinant of one-electron molecular functions ( aX l= U Nelec, ... 

Although the state correlation diagram is physically more meaningful than the orbital correlation diagram, usually the latter is used because of its simplicity. This is similar to the kind of approximation made when the electronic wave function is replaced by the products of one-electron wave functions in MO theory. The physical basis for the rule that only orbitals of the same symmetry can correlate is that only in this case can constructive overlap occur. This again has its analogy in the construction of molecular orbitals. The physical basis for the noncrossing rule is electron repulsion. It is important that this applies to orbitals—or states—of the same symmetry only. Orbitals of different symmetry cannot interact anyway, so their correlation lines are allowed to cross. 

As already pointed out, terms such as wave function, electron orbit, resonance, etc., with which we describe the formulations and results of wave mechanics, are borrowed from classical mechanics of matter in which concepts occur which, in certain respects at least, show a correspondence to the wave mechanical concepts in question. The same is the case with the electron spin. In Bohr s quantum theory, Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit s hypothesis meant the introduction of a fourth quantum number j, which can only take on the values +1/2 and —1/2- In wave mechanics it means that the total wave function, besides the orbital function, contains another factor, the spin function. This spin function can be represented by a or (3, whereby, for example, a describes the state j = +1/2 and P that with s = —1/2. The correspondence with the mechanical analogy, the top, from which the name spin has been borrowed, is appropriate in so far that the laevo and dextro rotatory character, or the pointing of the top in the + or — direction, can be connected with it. A magnetic moment and a... 

Figure 11.1 A schematic that illustrates the analogy between the theories for mechanical motions and for chemical dynamics. Newton s law of motion, governing a collection of particles with positions x (t), X2(t), , Xj/(t), arises from Schrodinger s equation for the wave function f in the limit h - 0. Similarly, the chemical master equation for p(n, n2, , ftat, t) yields the law of mass action in the limit V -> oo.

Compliance with the octet rule in diamond could be shown simply by using a valence bond approach in which each carbon atom is assumed sp hybridized. However, using the MO method will more clearly establish the connection with band theory. In solids, the extended electron wave functions analogous to MOs ate called COs. Crystal orbitals must belong to an irreducible representation, not of a point group, but of the space group reflecting the translational periodicity of the lattice. 

For solids with more localized electrons, the LCAO approach is perhaps more suitable. Here, the starting point is the isolated atoms (for which it is assumed that the electron-wave functions are already known). In this respect, the approach is the extreme opposite of the free-electron picture. A periodic solid is constructed by bringing together a large number of isolated atoms in a maimer entirely analogous to the way one builds molecules with the LCAO approximation to MO (LCAO-MO) theory. The basic assumption is that overlap between atomic orbitals is small enough that the extra potential experienced by an electron in a solid can be treated as a perturbation to the potential in an atom. The extended- (Bloch) wave function is treated as a superposition of localized orbitals, centered at each atom ... 

---