Virial theorem, electronic kinetic

Empedocles [701) proposed a general semi-empirical approach using data from the united-atom and separated-atom models and calculate the quadratic (harmonic), cubic and quartic force constants kz, kz and ki from the differentiation of the virial theorem electronic kinetic energy expression Eq. (4.27), where E is the total energy... 

The energy of a Is-electron in a hydrogen-like system (one nucleus and one electron) is —Z /2, and classically this is equal to minus the kinetic energy, 1/2 mv, due to the virial theorem E — —T = 1/2 V). In atomic units the classical velocity of a Is-electron is thus Z m= 1). The speed of light in these units is 137.036, and it is clear that relativistic effects cannot be neglected for the core electrons in heavy nuclei. For nuclei with large Z, the Is-electrons are relativistic and thus heavier, which has the effect that the 1 s-orbital shrinks in size, by the same factor by which the mass increases (eq. (8.2)). 

Wigner s formula is open to criticism also on another point, since he assumes the existence of a stationary electron state where the density is so low that the kinetic energy may be neglected. This is in contradiction to the virial theorem (Eq. 11.15), which tells us that the kinetic energy can never be neglected in comparison to the potential energy and that the latter quantity is compensated by the former to fifty per cent. A reexamination of the low density case would hence definitely be a problem of essential interest. 

The conclusion that the local hardness is given entirely by the variable parts of the kinetic energy is very logical. It is the kinetic energy increase which limits the distribution of electron density in all systems with fixed nuclei. Since the equilibrium state of atoms and molecules is characterized by minimum energy, they will also be marked by maximum kinetic energy because of the virial theorem. This will put them in agreement with the principles of maximum hardness, for which much evidence exists. 

In this work, the electronic kinetic energy is expressed in terms of the potential energy and derivatives of the potential energy with respect to nuclear coordinates, by use of the virial theorem (5-5). Thus, the results are valid for ail bound electronic states. However, the functional derived for E does not obey a variational principle with respect to (Pg ( )), even though in... 

A virial theorem (5-8) applied to the electronic coordinates gives the kinetic energy (T) in terms of (V) and expectation values of the first derivative of V with respect to nuclear coordinates (66-72). For bound electronic states f)... 

A differential virial theorem represents an exact, local (at space point r) relation involving the external potential u(r), the (ee) interaction potential u r,r ), the diagonal elements of the 1st and 2nd order DMs, n(r) and n2(r,r ), and the 1st order DM p(ri r2) close to diagonal , for a particular system. As it will be shown, it is a very useful tool for establishing various exact relations for a many electron systems. The mentioned dependence on p may be written in terms of the kinetic energy density tensor, defined as... 

Thus, if it is assumed that the local virial theorem is valid for the model electron densities fitted to the experimental structure factors, the kinetic, g(r), and potential, v(r), energy densities may be mapped, as well as the energy characteristics of the (3,-1) bond critical points evaluated [38]. 

According to eqn (6.103), the surface virial measures the disparity in the changes in the values of the electronic kinetic and potential energies over the basin of the atom required for the satisfaction of the virial theorem, as occasioned by the formation of chemical bonds. 

---