Very heavy atoms

Indelicato, P. and Lindroth, E. (1992) Relativistic effects, correlation, and QED corrections on Ka transitions in medium to very heavy atoms. Physical Review A, 46, 2426-2436. 

Relativistic effects result if electrons nearby very heavy atomic nuclei are accelerated to such an extent that Einstein s famous theory of relativity begins to take effect,... 

Partial wave methods have been widely used and tested on a variety of systems (see reference 19 and references therein). They are usually accurate to better than 50% for total ionization cross sections of light atoms. Very heavy atoms have been less successfully treated due to the increasing contributions of resonances and... 

Molecular Collisions. In the limit as t- -oo, spin-free selection rule, except in cases of near degeneracy or very heavy atoms. Some examples of spin-free transitions are discussed in Section V. Except in the case of atom-atom collisions, point-group selection rules are seldom of importance. 

The elements after fermium (atomic number 100) are sometimes called the transfermian or superheavy elements. All of them were created in the laboratory, some lasting only milliseconds before they break down. They do not have any special uses, but they do help scientists study what happens inside very heavy atoms. 

In this simple case there is no advantage to the pseudopotential calculation (the 3-21G( ) geometry is actually better ), but more challenging calculations on very-heavy-atom molecules, particularly transition metal molecules, rely heavily on ab initio or DFT (Chapter 7) calculations with pseudopotentials. Nevertheless, ordinary nonrelativistic all-electron basis sets sometimes give good results with quite heavy atoms [64]. A concise description of pseudopotential theory and specific relativistic effects on molecules, with several references, is given by Levine [65]. Reviews oriented toward transition metal molecules [66a,b,c] and the lanthanides [66d] have appeared, as well as detailed reviews of the more technical aspects of the theory [67]. See too Section 8.3. 

Lo et a/,102 have calculated spin-orbit coupling constants for first- and second-row atoms and for the first transition series, results agreeing with the work of Blume and Watson. Karayanis103 has extended the calculation to triply ionized rare earths. However, with very heavy atoms relativistic effects on the part of the wavefunction near the nucleus become severe, leading to a breakdown of the conditions under which simple perturbation theory ought to be applied. Lewis and co-workers104 have used relativistic self-consistent Dirac-Slater and Dirac-Fock wavefunctions to evaluate spin orbit coupling... 

Absorption of X rays within the crystal (if the crystal is very large, or if very "heavy" atoms are present. If light atoms (Z < 20), then in Eq. (10.6.17) f is real if absorption due to a "heavy" atom (Z > 60), then f is complex. 

The exciting photons are typically of much higher energies than those of the fundamental vibrations of most chemical bonds or systems of bonds, usually by a factor ranging from about 6 for O—H and C—H bonds to about 200 for bonds between very heavy atoms, as for example in I2. The 514.5 and 488 nm lines from an argon ion laser are often used as exciting frequencies. 

The likelihood of bond homolysis is directly related to the BDE for that bond. The BDE for the H-H bond is 104 kcal/mol, whereas the BDE for the Br Br bond is 46 kcal/mol, so the likelihood of H-H homolysis is much smaller than the likelihood of Br-Br homolysis. Sigma bonds that are particularly prone to homolysis include N-O and 0-0 bonds, bonds between C and very heavy atoms like Pb and I, halogen-halogen bonds, and very strained bonds. 

We know that this is only approximately true, because E depends on and in a complicated manner, but for the positive energy spectrum the constant term 2c (approximately 37 538 in atomic units) will in any case dominate this expression up to very heavy atoms. 

Historically, the first attempts to extend Ramsey s equation to take into account relativistic effects were by perturbation theoretical inclusion of SO contributions [16]. This leads to a third-order perturbation treatment that lends itself very nicely to a detailed interpretation of SO effects on chemical shifts. We will come back to the third-order perturbation theoretical ansatz in section 2.4. Before, we will concentrate on approaches, in which SO coupling is included in the zeroth-order Hamiltonian, in a relativistic four- or two-conponent framework. This is probably the preferred fi amework from a purely theoretical point of view, and it is most appropriate when relativistic effects are large, i.e. for systems containing very heavy atoms. 

The accuracy of DK KS wave functions for the description of g values can be illustrated by switching off the relativistic form of the Hartree interaction [19,35]. The commonly used DKnuc restriction (neglecting the two-electron contribution to the spin-orbit interaction) [14,16] notably overestimates the spin-orbit splitting (Section 3.1) [33]. For molecules without very heavy atoms, this approximation does not significantly change common observables [19]. However, g tensor values are much more sensitive to the proper relativistic form of... 

For example, the complete set of atomic shells caimot be resolved for very heavy atoms. In addition, ant/ such decomposition is somewhat arbitrary (see Section 2.7). 

A. Homonuclear Diatomics Containing Very Heavy Atoms. . 304... 

Separate identification for light elements is generally easy, but very difHcult for very heavy atoms. Since the heavier elements crowd together at the upper end of the spectrum, their separation mostly depends on the energy resolution... 

Pitzer, K.S., 1983, Electron structure of molecules with very heavy atoms using effective core potentials, in Relativistic Effects in Atoms, Molecules and Solids, NATO ASI Series, Series B Physics, Vol. 87, ed. G.L. Malli (Plenum, New York) p. 403. 

---