Types of Excited States

Electronic excitation is usually connected with an unpairing of electrons, which, as a rule of thumb, contributes 1 eV correlation energy change per pair. Furthermore, even the usual definition of the correlation energy (Ecorr = Eexact — Ehf) IS not unambiguous for excited states because a HE self-consistent field (SCF) description (which is used as uncorrelated reference) is rarely possible. Because the degree of sophistication of the theoretical treatment that can be performed is usually limited, it is important to know which main factors influence the magnitude of the electron-correlation contributions. 

Most electronic spectra are measured for closed-shell systems that usually have a large gap between occupied and virtual orbitals. This case is the 

As already mentioned, the accurate account of the electron correlation effects in the different states is the most important precondition to obtain reliable predictions for electronic spectra. Before considering some details of this simulation process, a few words on general aspects of EC in larger systems 

Valence Excitations between (non)bonding-anti-bonding orbitals Strongly varying amounts of EC 

Rydberg Excitations to virtual orbitals of large spatial extent Special AO basis sets required asymptotics of potential  

---

Lukeman, M. Wan, P. A new type of excited-state intramolecular proton transfer proton transfer from phenol OH to a carbon atom of an aromatic ring observed for 2-phenyl-phenol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9458-9464. 

Chou PT (2001) The host/guest type of excited-state proton transfer a general review. J Chin Chem Soc 48 651-682... 

An octahedral geometry (Oh symmetry) is, of course, an ideal case, which virtually none of our systems match. All have lower symmetry (typically >3 or Ci), which further splits the dlevels. However, the octahedral model is a starting point. Lowering the symmetries does not affect the basic nature of the types of excited states. Further, such important features as the d state energies are still dictated by the average A of the ligands. 

The photochemical results indicate that hydrogen abstraction proceeds from the 7171" singlet excited state of thiones 20a and 20b, and was followed by pho-tocyclization. Four parameters serve to define the geometry of intramolecular hydrogen atom abstraction d. A, 0, and co, which have the values shown in Table 5. Table 7 summarizes the ideal values of d. A, 0, and co for each type of excited state along with the crystallographically derived experimental values for compounds 20a,b. 

Little has been reported concerning the mechanism of the photocycloaddition reaction however, much is known about the photoreduction of carbonyl compounds.15,16 It has been shown that both hydrogen abstraction, leading to photoreduction, and most photocycloaddition reactions of carbonyl groups are characteristic of the same type of excited state reagent, that is, the carbonyl n,n state.17 Furthermore, much is known about the emission (phosphorescence and fluorescence) of carbonyl compounds, and all of this knowledge can be brought to bear upon the photocycloaddition reaction. 

One of the most important and difficult questions to answer for any photochemical reaction is which excited state is involved. Since these are the reagents, it is obviously important, if generalizations are to be made, to know which state is responsible for a given reaction. The question is difficult to answer because several different types of excited states, both singlet and triplet, are attainable even with the simplest of carbonyl compounds, and their reactivity may, in some cases, be similar. All of the discussion thus far has implied that the photocycloaddition reaction is characteristic of the n,n state. What is the evidence that this state can be involved and what is the character of this state which makes it reactive ... 

In general, carbonyl compounds that are reactive in the photocycloaddition reaction are also reduced upon irradiation in isopropyl alcohol.17 Subject to the limitation of triplet-triplet transfer to the olefin mentioned previously, the converse is also true. That is, carbonyl compounds that are photoreduced in isopropyl alcohol can form oxetanes unless their triplet energies are high enough for the olefins to act as quenchers. Thus, the two reactions are characteristic of the same type of excited state. (This is not an exclusive generalization.) The quenching experiments mentioned on pp. 308-311 provide evidence that the reactive state can be the triplet and, in some cases, only the triplet. Evidence for this state being n,ir comes from the fact that carbonyl compounds which are reactive usually emit from the n,n triplet, while those which are unreactive emit from some other excited state. 

Over the past several years we have been interested in determining to what extent the photochemistry of complex ions of various transition metal ions resemble thermal reaction chemistry as to products, and to what extent the behavior varies with the wave length or type of excited state produced. 

In the charge transfer state the polarity of the C- - O bond is actually reversed. Excess charge on oxygen makes it inert towards 2-propanol. The properties of these three types of excited states of aromatic carbonyl compounds are summarized in the Table 3.4. 

The plan of this article is as follows. In Section 7.3.2 we discuss the general physical chemistry of excited states and excited state processes. Section 7.3.3 surveys the characteristic reactivities of the various types of excited states found in d and / transition metal complexes (excluding organometallic compounds). Section 7.3.4 provides a brief account of some applications of transition metal photochemistry. 

EXCITED STATES AND EXCITED STATE PROCESSES 7.3.2.1 Types of Excited States... 

The wavelength dependence of quantum yields tends to be small over the region of absorption to a given type of excited state. Both quantum yield and reaction mode may change considerably, however, if a different type of absorption band is irradiated. The general conclusion is that crossing, particularly between d—d and CT states, is relatively inefficient. 

The second type of excited state is written as ir, it and results from a transition in which a -rr electron is excited to an antibonding -n orbital. The light absorbed to produce this transition is generally of shorter wavelength than that for the n n transition, and the process requires higher energies. The ir-+ir transition in ethylene is the result of absorption at 180 nm. 

Fits to single (one floating parameter) and double (three floating parameters) exponential decay laws are always poorer as judged by the x2 and residual traces. In the case where we assume that there is some type of excited-state process (e.g., solvent relaxation) we find that the spectral relaxation time is > 20 ns. This is much, much greater than any reasonable solvent relaxation process in supercritical CF3H. For example, in liquid water, the solvent relaxation times are near 1 ps (56). 

Next we discuss examples of the two types of excited states. To focus the treatment we deal only with the excited states of the smallest spin eigenvalue for a given system, that is, singlet states for a closed-shell molecule and doublet states for radicals. 

---