Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

True surface residence time

Unfortunately, intraparticle readsorption cannot be corrected using this method. If intraparticle readsorption is significant, it can be detected by adding unlabelled product to the feed stream, to compete for readsorption sites with the labelled product formed during reaction. The observed surface residence time of product will approach the true surface residence time at higher concentrations of product added. [Pg.196]

Schemes that one may apply to deduce aerosol residence times from various radioactive elements have been reviewed by Junge (1963), Martell and Moore (1974), and Turekian et al. (1977). The published data admit residence times in the range 4-72 days, but crowd into two groups of values averaging 6 and 35 days, respectively. From the evidence available to him, Junge (1963) concluded that the higher value was appropriate to the troposphere as a whole and that the lower values were applicable only to the boundary layer near the Earth surface. Martell and Moore (1974), after having critically reviewed older and newer data, came to the opposite conclusion, namely, that the high values are due to the contribution of stratospheric aerosols, apart from misinterpretations of some data, while the lower values represent the true tropospheric residence time essentially independent of altitude. Schemes that one may apply to deduce aerosol residence times from various radioactive elements have been reviewed by Junge (1963), Martell and Moore (1974), and Turekian et al. (1977). The published data admit residence times in the range 4-72 days, but crowd into two groups of values averaging 6 and 35 days, respectively. From the evidence available to him, Junge (1963) concluded that the higher value was appropriate to the troposphere as a whole and that the lower values were applicable only to the boundary layer near the Earth surface. Martell and Moore (1974), after having critically reviewed older and newer data, came to the opposite conclusion, namely, that the high values are due to the contribution of stratospheric aerosols, apart from misinterpretations of some data, while the lower values represent the true tropospheric residence time essentially independent of altitude.
Measurements of the true reaction times are sometimes difficult to determine due to the two-phase nature of the fluid reactants in contact with the solid phase. Adsorption of reactants on the catalyst surface can result in catalyst-reactant contact times that are different from the fluid dynamic residence times. Additionally, different velocities between the vapor, liquid, and solid phases must be considered when measuring reaction times. Various laboratory reactors and their limitations for industrial use are reviewed below. [Pg.244]

In the structure with all the surfactant molecules located at monolayers, the volume fraction of surfactant should be proportional to the average surface area times the width of the monolayer divided by the volume, i.e., Ps (X Sa/V. The proportionality constant is called the surfactant parameter [34]. This is true for a single surface with no intersections. In our mesoscopic description the volume is measured in units of the volume occupied by the surfactant molecule, and the area is measured in units of the area occupied by the amphiphile. In other words, in our model the area of the monolayer is the dimensionless quantity equal to the number of amphiphiles residing on the monolayer. Hence, it should be identified with the area rescaled by the surfactant parameter of the corresponding structure. [Pg.729]

Thorium generally exists as a neutral hydroxide species in the oceans and is highly insoluble. Its behavior is dominated by a tendency to become incorporated in colloids and/or adhere to the surfaces of existing particles (Cochran 1992). Because ocean particles settle from the water column on the timescale of years, Th isotopes are removed rapidly and have an average residence time of = 20 years (Fig. 1). This insoluble behavior has led to the common assertion that Th is always immobile in aqueous conditions. While this is generally true in seawater, there are examples of Th being complexed as a carbonate (e.g.. Mono Lake waters, Anderson et al. 1982 Simpson et al. 1982) in which form it is soluble. [Pg.497]

Cant and Hall (13) suggest a mechanism of leaking D into the zeolite by exchange with acidic OH via 1 1 complex of ethylene. For D2, D is presumably leaking into the pool of rapidly moving H. Imanaka et al. (12) suggest that a triatomic intermediate is formed with the hydroxyls. If this is true for the supercage hydroxyls, the residence time of D2 on the surface site occupied by a proton should be on the order of 10-6 sec to have a chance to capture the proton (23, 25). [Pg.494]

Employing a flow rate of 1 (il min 1 and a residence time of 0.86 min, the authors obtained 87% conversion of L-lysine (191), exhibiting 22% selectivity for pipecolinic acid and 14% yield of L-pipecolinic acid 190. To demonstrate the TCM s efficiency, the authors also performed the reaction in batch employing 2wt% Pt-loaded Ti02 particles, which afforded the same surface to volume ratio of catalyst as calculated to be within the TCM, whereby a reaction time of 60 min afforded analogous results. The authors concluded that the increased reaction efficiency observed within the TCM was attributed to the efficient irradiation of the reaction mixture however, for a true comparison they noted that measurement of the quantum yield of each system would be required. [Pg.170]

The true reservoir size for carbon dioxide, however, is larger than its concentration, [CO2], because of the carbonate system reactions. The ratio of the reservoir of DIG that exchanges carbon to the CO2 gas reservoir in the mixed layer is ADIC / A[C02]. Thus, the residence time for carbon in the surface ocean with respect to gas exchange from Eq. (11.23) is ... [Pg.392]

The difference between the two kinds of colloid systems resides in the equilibrium character of the true single colloid systems " and the non-equilibrium character of the "apparent single colloid systems . Considered from the two-phase standpoint, the mutual surface of contact between the colloid-rich and the colloid-poor phase is very great in these latter systems, so that they attempt to reduce this surface of contact. They will therefore chaise their properties with time while the true single systems do not change with time. [Pg.234]


See other pages where True surface residence time is mentioned: [Pg.196]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.787]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.435]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.196 ]




SEARCH



Surface residence time

True

True residence time

© 2024 chempedia.info