Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transverse Exchange Energy

Table 5.5. Transverse exchange energies ( j) and its Breit approximation (Ej ) from RHF- [68] and RLDA-calculations [36]. Also the total correction is given (all energies are in... Table 5.5. Transverse exchange energies ( j) and its Breit approximation (Ej ) from RHF- [68] and RLDA-calculations [36]. Also the total correction is given (all energies are in...
Transverse exchange energies ( j) for closed subshell atoms Selfconsistent ROPM, RLDA and B88-RGGA results in comparison with perturbative RHF values (Coulomb gauge for j in the case of RHF — all energies in Hartree [172]). [Pg.574]

The kernels with two transverse exchanges in Fig. 4.4 give the following contribution to the energy shift in the scattering approximation... [Pg.85]

Fig. 4.1. Relativistic correction factor for the EDA exchange energy density longitudinal contribution (B.54), transverse contribution (B.55) and total correction -I- J... Fig. 4.1. Relativistic correction factor for the EDA exchange energy density longitudinal contribution (B.54), transverse contribution (B.55) and total correction -I- J...
Table 4.1 Exchange-only ground-state energies from ROPM and RHF calculations for noble gas atoms Coulomb (C) and Coulomb-Breit (C + B) limit in comparison with complete transverse exchange (C + T) (Engel et al. 1998a). For the RHF approximation the energy difference with respect to the ROPM is given, AE = tot(RHF) — tot(ROPM), providing results from (a) finite-differences calculations (Dyall et al. 1989) and (b) a basis-set expansion (Ishikawa and Koc 1994). All energies in mHartree. uext and c as in Ishikawa and Koc (1994). Table 4.1 Exchange-only ground-state energies from ROPM and RHF calculations for noble gas atoms Coulomb (C) and Coulomb-Breit (C + B) limit in comparison with complete transverse exchange (C + T) (Engel et al. 1998a). For the RHF approximation the energy difference with respect to the ROPM is given, AE = tot(RHF) — tot(ROPM), providing results from (a) finite-differences calculations (Dyall et al. 1989) and (b) a basis-set expansion (Ishikawa and Koc 1994). All energies in mHartree. uext and c as in Ishikawa and Koc (1994).
The curvature coupling elements are thus simply off-diagonal matrix elements of the unprojected force constant matrix in the basis of eigenvectors of the projected force constant matrix. The classical notion that a trajectory will overshoot the path and climb the wall if the path curves on the way down the hill is a reflection of this curvature coupling. Climbing the wall in a transverse direction is tantamount to exchanging energy between the reaction path and the transverse vibration. [Pg.62]

Exchange-only ionization potentials of neutral atoms calculated from ground state energy differences For the ROPM the selfconsistent inclusion of the transverse exchange (C-fT) is compared with complete neglect of (C). The RGGA data have been obtained by the relativistic extension of the Becke parameterization [37] (all energies in mHartree [172]). [Pg.566]

E = exchange energy Ep = Fermi energy Eh = transverse Hall electric field Ej = energy of crystal field level E , = magnetoelastic energy... [Pg.412]


See other pages where Transverse Exchange Energy is mentioned: [Pg.44]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.1272]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.55]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.553 ]




SEARCH



Energy exchanger

Energy exchanging

Exchange energy

© 2024 chempedia.info