Transmission electron microscopy determine crystal structures

The main techniques employed for the characterization of clusters include UV/vis optical absorption, luminescence, mass spectrometry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR). Single crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD) has been used to determine the structures of a few clusters [17-19]. 

A mineral is a naturally occurring, crystalline inorganic compound with a specific chemical composition and crystal structure. Minerals are commonly named to honor a person, to indicate the geographic area where the mineral was discovered, or to highlight some distinctive chemical, crystallographic, or physical characteristic of the substance. Each mineral sample has some obvious properties color, shape, texture, and perhaps odor or taste. However, to determine the precise composition and crystal structure necessary to accurately identify the species, one or several of the following techniques must be employed optical, x-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and diffraction, and chemical and spectral analyses. 

The chemical composition can be measured by traditional wet and instrumental methods of analysis. Physical surface area is measured using the N2 adsorption method at liquid nitrogen temperature (BET method). Pore size is measured by Hg porosimetry for pores with diameters larger than about 3.0 nm (30 A) or for smaller pores by N2 adsorp-tion/desorption. Active catalytic surface area is measured by selective chemisorption techniques or by x-ray diffraction (XRD) line broadening. The morphology of the carrier is viewed by electron microscopy or its crystal structure by XRD. The active component can also be measured by XRD but there are certain limitations once its particle size is smaller than about 3.5 nm (35 A). For small crystallites transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is most often used. The location of active components or poisons within the catalyst is determined by electron microprobe. Surface contamination is observed directly by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). 

There are a number of different types of electron microscope, but for the present purposes they can be divided into two categories, scanning and transmission. Scanning electron microscopy, broadly speaking, is used to reveal surface topography, while transmission electron microscopy is of more relevance to crystal structure determination. This is the only type of electron microscopy considered here. 

For the comprehension of mechanisms involved in the appearance of novel properties in polymer-emhedded metal nanostructures, their characterization represents the fundamental starting point. The microstructural characterization of nanohllers and nanocomposite materials is performed mainly by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), large-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD), and optical spectroscopy (UV-Vis). These three techniques are very effective in determining particle morphology, crystal structure, composition, and particle size. 

Identifying the particular Mn oxide mineral is not straightforward because the sanq)les are usually not crystallized well enough for sii e-crystal diffiaction studies, especially witii synthetic oxides of the type formed here. In this study, we will apply powder x-ray dif action and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), along with chemical analysis, to identify the type of structure and to determine the properties of the Mn oxide. 

Phase identification may be accomplished via XRD. FTIR is recommended as a complementary technique because it allows identification of phase amounts and structures not readily detectable with XRD (Ducheyne, 1990). Grain sizes may be determined through either optical microscopy, SEM, or transmission electron microscopy (TEM), depending on the order of the grain size. Additionally, TEM is useful to characterize second phases, crystal structure, and lattice imperfections. Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) may also be utilized to determine surface and interfacial compositions. Chemical stability and surface activity may be analyzed via XPS and measurements of ionic fluxes and zeta potentials. It is assumed that two different pathways of activity exist solution and cell-mediated (Jarcho, 1981). 

There are many other spectroscopic techniques, but let me mention just one more, the X-ray crystallography method, which yield complete 3D information on a molecule (Scheme 9.9b). The technique is based on the phenomenon that when X-rays hit a crystal, which is an ordered solid form made of many molecules, the material diffracts the X-rays in patterns that reflect the distances between the atoms in the molecule. As such, the X-ray diffraction pattern can be analyzed and can provide us with the bond distances and the angles in a molecule. The rather complex statistical mathematical analysis was developed by Herbert Aaron Hauptman and Jerome Karle, who were awarded the Nobel Prize for their work in 1985.In this manner, chemists, called X-ray crystallographers, are able today to determine the structure of any molecule that can be crystallized as an ordered solid (or half-ordered, as in the case of Dan Shechtman, who won the Nobel Prize in 2011 using X-ray crystallography and a related technique called transmission electron microscopy). This powerful method resulted in close to 30 Nobel Prizes. 

When macromolecular cholesteric liquid crystals were imaged, a twisting of molecular orientation, which translated into a periodic lamellar structure in the materials, was foimd. Good agreement between afm and tern (transmission electron microscopy) was obtained in determining the widths of the lamellae. When the same polymer was processed from an isotropic solution, a homogeneous and nodular structure, lacking the periodicity of the cholesteric structure, was obtained (107). 

---