Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transition state topology

Here, with six electrons involved, it is in the disrotatory mode (Huckel system) that the transition state is stabilized. The chart that follows gives a general summary of the relationship between transition state topology, the number of electrons, and the stability of the transition state. [Pg.604]

Up to this point, we have emphasized the stereochemical properties of molecules as objects, without concern for processes which affect the molecular shape. The term dynamic stereochemistry applies to die topology of processes which effect a structural change. The cases that are most important in organic chemistry are chemical reactions, conformational changes, and noncovalent complex formation. In order to understand the stereochemical aspects of a dynamic process, it is essential not only that the stereochemical relationship between starting and product states be established, but also that the spatial features of proposed intermediates and transition states must account for the observed stereochemical transformations. [Pg.97]

The selection rules for cycloaddition reactions can also be derived from consideration of the aromaticity of the transition state. The transition states for [2tc -f 2tc] and [4tc -1- 2tc] cycloadditions are depicted in Fig. 11.11. For the [4tc-1-2tc] suprafacial-suprafacial cycloaddition, the transition state is aromatic. For [2tc -F 2tc] cycloaddition, the suprafacial-suprafacial mode is antiaromatic, but the suprafacial-antarafacial mode is aromatic. In order to specify the topology of cycloaddition reactions, subscripts are added to the numerical classification. Thus, a Diels-Alder reaction is a [4tc -f 2 ] cycloaddition. The... [Pg.640]

What does the set of possible state transition graph topologies for families of structurally similar graphs look like ... [Pg.110]

The next section introduces the topological concept of low-barrier transition states through the prevention of formation of shared bonds between reacting surface adsorbates and surface metal atoms. [Pg.25]

In the case of n-butene isomerization it was demonstrated (Figure 2) that the ideal micro-pore topology led to retardation of the C8 dimer intermediate and that the catalyst based on the ferrierite structure was close to optimal in this respect [1). For selective isodewaxing a one-dimensional pore structure which constrained the skeletal isomerization transition state and thereby minimized multiple branching such as the SAPO-11 structure was found to meet these criteria. Clearly, these are ideal systems in which to apply computational chemistry where the reactant and product molecules are relatively simple and the micro-porous structures are ordered and known in detail. [Pg.2]

Figures 5.20 illustrates the equilibrium and transition-state structures obtained for these complexes. As shown, the L1H-H20 complex in equilibrium state 1 shows an intramolecular dihydrogen bond with a very short H- H distance of 1.580 A calculated at the MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p) level. The topological analysis of the electron density on the H- H direction has resulted in the small pc and positive V pc values (0.0388 and 0.0453 an, respectively) typical of dihydrogen bonding. In contrast, no dihydrogen bonding was observed in the LiH-H2S molecule (3), where the corresponding hydrogen atoms are strongly remote. Figures 5.20 illustrates the equilibrium and transition-state structures obtained for these complexes. As shown, the L1H-H20 complex in equilibrium state 1 shows an intramolecular dihydrogen bond with a very short H- H distance of 1.580 A calculated at the MP2/6-311++G(2d,2p) level. The topological analysis of the electron density on the H- H direction has resulted in the small pc and positive V pc values (0.0388 and 0.0453 an, respectively) typical of dihydrogen bonding. In contrast, no dihydrogen bonding was observed in the LiH-H2S molecule (3), where the corresponding hydrogen atoms are strongly remote.
Fig. 15. Topology of the orbital interactions for the cyclo-addition pericyclic transition state of C2(CN)4 + [Fe(CO)3(l,4-i -C7H8)]. Fig. 15. Topology of the orbital interactions for the cyclo-addition pericyclic transition state of C2(CN)4 + [Fe(CO)3(l,4-i -C7H8)].

See other pages where Transition state topology is mentioned: [Pg.614]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.614]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.742]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.703]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.930]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.603]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.473 ]




SEARCH



Systems transition state topology

Topological state

Topological transitions

Topologically transitive

Topology of the State Transition Graph

Transition state aromaticity Mobius topologies

© 2024 chempedia.info