Transfer factor, heat stable

The accompanying figure depicts aspects of their classic study. Injection of heat-killed virulent S strain was not fatal to the laboratory mice studied. However, coinjection of heat-killed S strain and live nonvirulent R strain killed the mice. The newly created strain continued to be virulent in succeeding generations. Clearly, the genetic factor in the S strain was heat stable and transferred to the R strain. Avery and colleagues purified... 

In these overall pathways (Fig. 4) there appear to be at least two novel transmethylation reactions. The methyl group of methanol may be transferred to either Bias, forming methyl-B12 (Blaylock, 1968) or be incorporated into methane (Blaylock and Stadtman, 1966). The former reaction is dependent upon ATP and Mg" (Blaylock and Stadtman, 1966), which has led to the speculation that possibly methanol is activated prior to methyl transfer by formation of methyl-ADP (Barker, 1967). The formation of methane from CH3-B12 requires several protein fractions (including a Co-corrinoid protein), a reducing system, and ATP, which plays an unexplained role. In addition, a heat-stable cofactor may be involved (Blaylock, 1968). Very recently it has been briefly reported (McBride and Wolfe, 1970) that the methyl group of CH3-B12 is transferred to a soluble cofactor prior to its reduction to methane. The unidentified methylation cofactor could not be replaced by any of the known methyl transfer factors (McBride and Wolfe, 1970). Further study of these unusual types of reactions will be required before the details of the methyl transfer steps are clarified. 

The ideal high level heat-transfer medium would have excellent heat-transfer capabiUty over a wide temperature range, be low in cost, noncorrosive to common materials of constmction, nondammable, ecologically safe, and thermally stable. It also would remain Hquid at winter ambient temperatures and afford high rates of heat transfer. In practice, the value of a heat-transfer medium depends on several factors its physical properties in relation to system efficiency its thermal stabiUty at the service temperature its adaptabiUty to various systems and certain of its physical properties. 

Another factor influencing contaminant and heat transfer from dirty to clean zones against the stable airflow is a turbulent exchange between these zones. This process should be considered in the design of displacement or natural ventilation systems and evaluation of the emission rate of contaminants from the encapsulated process equipment (Fig. 7.111a). 

Let us now explore in more detail the factors that determine the number of steady-state solutions. First, we notice from Eq. (5.11) that the slope of the line is steep for small heat exchangers (e<heat exchanger at all (e = 0). This is completely opposite to what we observed for a jacketed CSTR in Chap. 4. In a jacketed CSTR the slope of the heat removal line increases with the size of the heat transfer area. The difference is that, in the case of a CSTR, a large heat transfer area increases the rate of heat removal (exergy destruction), driving the system toward stable operation at a single steady state, whereas in the case of an FEHE system,... 

The significance of this centrifugal effect is that if can cause a series of fairly stable vortices to be set up between and travel with the blades. Figure 11 shows this effect. This implies that the outer dimension of the vortex is equal to the gap width H and that the mixing length L lies somewhere between H and 2H. Because this is about a tenth of the distance between the blades, the heat transfer should be increased by a factor of 2-3. 

The time delay of the heat transfer to the coolant and moderator water is an important factor in the mechanism of coupled neutronic and thermal-hydraulic instability. The Super LWR is a reactor system with a positive density coefficient of reactivity and a large time delay constant. If there is no time delay, a decrease in density would cause a decrease in power generation, which suppresses any further decrease in density, stabilizing the system. However, if there is a large time delay, it causes a decrease in the gain of the density reactivity transfer function, and reduces the effect of density reactivity feedback, making the system less stable. The time delay of the heat transfer to the water rods is much larger than that to the coolant. Thus the reactor system becomes less stable when the water rod model is included than the case without it. 

---