Three-phase slurry reactors agitated tanks

In connection with the engineering content of the book, a large number of reactors is analyzed two- and three-phase (slurry) agitated reactors (batch and continuous flow), two-and three-phase fixed beds (fixed beds, trickle beds, and packed bubble beds), three-phase (slurry) bubble columns, and two-phase fluidized beds. All these reactors are applicable to catalysis two-phase fixed and fluidized beds and agitated tank reactors concern adsorption and ion exchange as well. 

Despite the experience with batch reactors it may be worthwhile to operate continuous reactors also for fine chemicals. Continuously operated reactors only demand for one start-up and one shut-down during the production series for one product. This increases the operating time efficiency and prevents the deactivation of dry catalysts this implies that the reactor volume can be much smaller than for batch reactors. As to the reactor type for three phase systems an agitated slurry tank reactor [5,6] is not advisable, because of the good mixing characteristics. Specially for consecutive reaction systems the yields to desired products and selectivities will be considerably lower than in plug flow type reactor. The cocurrent down flow trickle flow reactor... 

Note that three-phase bubble columns and agitated tank reactors are sometimes referred to as slurry reactors. 

The overall rate of reaction calculated for the three-phase fluidised-bed reactor above is approximately one tenth of the rate calculated for the agitated tank slurry reactor in Example 4.6. The main reasons are the very poor effectiveness factor and the relatively smaller external surface area for mass transfer caused by using the larger particles. Even the gas-liquid transfer resistance is greater for the three-phase fluidised-bed, in spite of the larger particles being able to produce relatively small bubbles these bubbles are not however as small as can be produced... 

---