Thermally labile substance, examination

The main difference between field ionization (FI) and field desorption ionization (FD) lies in the manner in which the sample is examined. For FI, the substance under investigation is heated in a vacuum so as to volatilize it onto an ionization surface. In FD, the substance to be examined is placed directly onto the surface before ionization is implemented. FI is quite satisfactory for volatile, thermally stable compounds, but FD is needed for nonvolatile and/or thermally labile substances. Therefore, most FI sources are arranged to function also as FD sources, and the technique is known as FI/FD mass spectrometry. 

For nonvolatile or thermally labile samples, a solution of the substance to be examined is applied to the emitter electrode by means of a microsyringe outside the ion source. After evaporation of the solvent, the emitter is put into the ion source and the ionizing voltage is applied. By this means, thermally labile substances, such as peptides, sugars, nucleosides, and so on, can be examined easily and provide excellent molecular mass information. Although still FI, this last ionization is referred to specifically as field desorption (FD). A comparison of FI and FD spectra of D-glucose is shown in Figure 5.6. 

The process of field ionization presupposes that the substance under investigation has been volatilized by heat, so some molecules of vapor settle onto the tips held at high potential. In such circumstances, thermally labile substances still cannot be examined, even though the ionization process itself is mild. To get around this difficulty, a solution of the substance under investigation can be placed on the wire and the solvent allowed to evaporate. When an electric potential is applied, positive or negative ions are produced, but no heating is necessary to volatilize the substance. This technique is called field desorption (FD) ionization. 

Both FI and FD provide good molecular mass information, but few if any fragment ions, and allow thermally labile substances such as peptides, nucleosides, and glycerides to be examined, as well as inorganic salts. 

The process of field ionization presupposes that the substance under investigation has been volatilized by heat, so some molecules of vapor settle onto the tips held at high potential. In such circumstances, thermally labile substances still cannot be examined, even though the ionization process itself is mild. 

The mix of ions, formed essentially at or near ambient temperatures, is passed through a nozzle (or skimmer) into the mass spectrometer for mass analysis. Since the ions are formed in the vapor phase without having undergone significant heating, many thermally labile and normally nonvolatile substances can be examined in this way. 

Evaporation from a spray of charged droplets produced from a stream of liquid yields ions that can be analyzed in a mass spectrometer. Thermally labile and normally nonvolatile substances such as sugars, peptides, and proteins can be examined successfully. 

How do we decide whether to separate a mixture by gc or hplc In gc, mixtures are examined in the vapour phase, so that we have to be able to form a stable vapour from our mixture, or convert the substances in it to derivatives that are thermally stable. Only about 20% of chemical compounds are suitable for gc without some form of sample modification the remainder are thermally unstable or involatile. In addition, substances with highly polar or ionisable functional groups often show poor chromatographic behaviour by gc, being very prone to tailing. Thus hplc is the better technique for macromolecules, inorganic or other ionic species, labile natural products, pharmaceutical compounds and biochemicals. 

---

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ ]

---