The transformation problem

Marx s development of the reproduction schema in the second volume of Capital is predicated on an assumption that prices are proportionate to values  

In as much as prices diverge from values, this circumstance cannot exert any influence on the movement of the social capital. The same mass of products is exchanged afterwards as before, even though the value relationships in which the individual capitalists are involved are no longer proportionate to their respective advances and the quantities of surplus-value produced by each of them. 

The purpose of this chapter is to consider how our macro monetary interpretation of the reproduction schema can be generalized into a model with price-value deviations. 

This generalization is attempted by considering the new interpretation of the transformation problem, as developed by Foley (1982).1 In contrast to the perceived Sraffian view of capitalism, as a system producing a physical 

An important criticism of Marx s development of the reproduction schema in Capital, volume 2, is that he fails to consider the importance of competition. For Howard and King (1985 191), Marx s reproduction models do not relate to a full competitive capitalist system, in which capital mobility and credit flows operate to equalise profit rates and bring about prices of production which deviate from labour values. As a result, Marx may have drawn unwarranted conclusions as to the difficulties involved in achieving fully co-ordinated production in capitalism (ibid. 191). This key limitation of the reproduction schema is addressed here. 

---

The overwhelming response to this transformation problem, for both Marx s critics and disciples, has been to abandon the definition of value as a quantity of labour embodied in production. Either value is redefined in a way that allows the transformation problem to be solved or the labour theory of value is abandoned altogether. 

How does this model of the circuit of money relate to the transformation problem It can be shown how this model can be generalized to a Sraffian interpretation. Since c = pAX/pX and w = wlX/pX it follows from (8.6) that... 

It should be noted that proponents of the new interpretation do not claim that they have solved the transformation problem as such, which is why they view their approach to be an interpretation rather than a solution. However, what their approach does show is that it is possible, at least in principle, to retain Marxian value categories in a general model of money and aggregate demand in a capitalist economy. 

The term representing surplus value (e) is a constituent element of the interindustry model of the circuit of money. Therefore, regardless of how prices are defined, the traditional labour embodied definition of surplus value has a role to play in modelling the interindustry circuit of money. This has important ramifications for the transformation problem, for which value-form theorists have suggested a different definition of surplus value, as discussed in Chapter 8. 

This approach, also known as the new solution to the transformation problem, was independently developed by Dumenil (1983). 

Seton, F. (1975) The transformation problem , Review of Economic Studies, 24 149-60. 

You might think at this point the correlation is complete. It is not, though, because the data were transformed to make the parameter estimation problem linear. Thus, the statistics are in terms of the transformed problem. It is always a good idea to calculate the curve lit using the original variables. You can do this most conveniently by duplicating some columns so they are adjacent for plotting purposes, as shown in Table E.6. 

Note that in this case, the function x (to) is presumed to be known (usually by virtue of the symmetric geometry of the transformed problem), and is a geometric... 

The transformed problem (12 311) is mathematically equivalent to the special case of a 2D disturbance with a = v = 0. Inherent in Squire s transformation is the fact that, for... 

Conformal mapping provides a transformation of variables that converts one mathematical problem into another. Its importance lies in the greater ease with which the transformed problem may be solved than the original problem. Applications arise in steady-state conduction or diffusion problems. 

Thus notice that the results of Chapter 3 can be utilized to solve the transformed problem. 

Cho derived an analytical solution for this transformation reactions. He made some assumptions to derive a simplified version for the transformation problem. The main assumption is the linear equilibrium condition for cation exchange reactions of NH. Writing Eq. (6) for the three species NH (Cj), NO 2 (C2) and NO (C3) in one-dimensional form with the assumption of constant solution flow and constant dispersion value for the species, yields (van Genuchten, 1985) ... 

Equation [3] states that distances are conserved, whereas Eq. [4] says that internal reflection is not allowed. Rotations and translations are two examples of rigid body transformation, and in fact, a general rigid body transformation can be expressed as a combination of a rotation R and a translation T. The transformation problem can then be restated as finding the optimal rotation R and optimal translation Tsuch that A — RB — T is a minimum. 

After planning the synthesis, the reagents required for the transform problem can be provided magnesium metal to make the Grignard reagent, formaldehyde to give an alcohol product with one additional carbon, and SOCb to convert benzyl alcohol to benzyl chloride. 

To fix ideas, we will formulate the transformed problem for a single-phase, eompressible flow with a eonstant horizontal permeability kh in the areal (x,y) eoordinates, and a variable permeability kv(z) in the layered, vertieal z direetion. The matrix porosity z) may vary with z. The fluid viseosity p is assumed to be eonstant. The governing equation then takes the following form,... 

The transformed problem is treatable only if one can assume that the carrier is still delocalized. In this case the bosonic component of Vei can be eliminated approximating Vei = e Veie with its thermal average (yei) - This is equivalent to the assumption that the phonon occupation number does not change during the transport, i.e., that inelastic processes are not important. In this limit we have for the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) ... 

---