Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The LCAO Basis Set Approach

In our QM systems, we have temporarily restricted ourselves to systems of one electron. If, in addition, our system were to have only one nucleus, then we would not need to guess wave functions, but instead we could solve Eq. (4.16) exactly. The eigenfunctions that are determined in that instance are the familiar hydrogenic atomic orbitals. Is, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 3d, etc., whose properties and derivation are discussed in detail in standard texts on quantum mechanics. For the moment, we will not investigate the mathematical representation of these hydrogenic atomic orbitals in any detail, but we will simply posit that, as functions, they may be useful in the construction of more complicated molecular orbitals. In particular, just as in Eq. (4.10) we constructed a guess wave function as a linear combination of exact wave functions, so here we will construct a guess wave function / as a linear combination of atomic wave functions (p, i.e., [Pg.112]

Note that Eq. (4.17) does not specify the locations of the basis functions. Our intuition suggests that they should be centered on the atoms of the molecule, but this is certainly not a requirement. If this comment seems odd, it is worth emphasizing at this point that we should not let our chemical intuition limit our mathematical flexibility. As chemists, we choose to use atomic orbitals (AOs) because we anticipate that they will be efficient functions for the representation of MOs. However, as mathematicians, we should immediately stop thinking about our choices as orbitals, and instead consider them only to be functions, so that we avoid being conceptually influenced about how and where to use them. [Pg.112]


See other pages where The LCAO Basis Set Approach is mentioned: [Pg.111]    [Pg.101]   


SEARCH



LCAO

LCAO approach

LCAOs

The setting

© 2024 chempedia.info