The Frame for New Hypotheses of Evolution

How does one present any new idea which is in principle impossible to proof  

Mathematical models that describe and predict the inanimate world quite well are actually of little value in the system of deterministic chaos that governs biology. The answers one can expect from mathematical approaches to evolution (in contrast to my earlier perception) cannot be narrowed to less than the surface of the chaotic attractor of the system which is a little like watching evolution on earth from a satellite.1 The limits of the attractor surface are given by the initial conditions which are not knowable in sufficient detail.2 Empiricism can help, after all our laws of science by and large are the results of repeated observations. 

Fossils and chemistry would be stretching correlations within a Darwinian framework but that relation is the substance of the new hypothesis. Chemistry is part of the logical core of biology, which will become more obvious when speciation is considered in the Genomic Potential Hypothesis. It is, like all of evolution, about molecules that self-organize without the help of anything but other molecules, i.e., chemistry. 

Chemistry is invisible until one can make a prediction based upon what chemistry can do and then look for the results, which in this case are clearly visible in 3.5 billion year-old rocks. There was nothing but chemistry before so that the time and location of imprints of early microbes near the edge of existence of our planet takes on 

The Genomic Potential Hypothesis A Chemist s View of the Origins, Evolution and Unfolding of Life, by Christian Schwabe. 2001 Eurekah.com 

---