Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The Discretized Diffusion Equation

The following partial differential equation describes what is going on in solution  [Pg.105]

Cg2 = concentrations for the first and second species for the nth solution chemical reaction rate expression [Pg.106]

This is Pick s second law modified by a term to account for a generalized set of first- and/or second-order chemical reactions. Because of the symmetry of the situation, we need consider only diffusion that is normal to the electrode. [Pg.106]

Near the electrode the concentrations will be determined in part by the potential of the electrode (through the Butler-Volmer equation). At a distance beyond the diffusion layer, the concentrations will be at bulk values. These are the boundary conditions for Equation (1). [Pg.106]

The Pick s law part of Equation (1) can be converted to discrete form through an application of Taylor series approximations of a function around a point. The iforward and backward series are given in Equations (2) and (3) respectively. [Pg.106]


The spatial derivative at timestep tn+1 /2 can be approximated by taking its average over the timesteps tn and tn+i. Hence, the discretized diffusion equation takes the form ... [Pg.228]

Eggels and Somers (1995) used an LB scheme for simulating species transport in a cavity flow. Such an LB scheme, however, is more memory intensive than a FV formulation of the convective-diffusion equation, as in the LB discretization typically 18 single-precision concentrations (associated with the 18 velocity directions in the usual lattice) need to be stored, while in the FV just 2 or 3 (double-precision) variables are needed. Scalar species transport therefore can better be simulated with an FV solver. [Pg.176]

Up to this point, the treatments have involved reactions for which the discrete form of the reaction-diffusion equations involve only terms in concentration of the species to which the discrete equation applies. That is, if there were two substances involved, O and R as above, then the discrete equation at a point i had terms only in C 0 for species O, and only C R for species R. This made it possible to use the Thomas algorithm to reduce a system like (6.27) to (6.28), treating the two species systems separately. They then get coupled through the boundary conditions. [Pg.94]

Chapter 8 by W. T. Coffey, Y. P. Kalmykov, and S. V. Titov, entitled Fractional Rotational Diffusion and Anomalous Dielectric Relaxation in Dipole Systems, provides an introduction to the theory of fractional rotational Brownian motion and microscopic models for dielectric relaxation in disordered systems. The authors indicate how anomalous relaxation has its origins in anomalous diffusion and that a physical explanation of anomalous diffusion may be given via the continuous time random walk model. It is demonstrated how this model may be used to justify the fractional diffusion equation. In particular, the Debye theory of dielectric relaxation of an assembly of polar molecules is reformulated using a fractional noninertial Fokker-Planck equation for the purpose of extending that theory to explain anomalous dielectric relaxation. Thus, the authors show how the Debye rotational diffusion model of dielectric relaxation of polar molecules (which may be described in microscopic fashion as the diffusion limit of a discrete time random walk on the surface of the unit sphere) may be extended via the continuous-time random walk to yield the empirical Cole-Cole, Cole-Davidson, and Havriliak-Negami equations of anomalous dielectric relaxation from a microscopic model based on a... [Pg.586]

Another most important question in anomalous dielectric relaxation is the physical interpretation of the parameters a and v in the various relaxation formulas and what are the physical conditions that give rise to these parameters. Here we shall give a reasonably convincing derivation of the fractional Smoluckowski equation from the discrete orientation model of dielectric relaxation. In the continuum limit of the orientation sites, such an approach provides a justification for the fractional diffusion equation used in the explanation of the Cole-Cole equation. Moreover, the fundamental solution of that equation for the free rotator will, by appealing to self-similarity, provide some justification for the neglect of spatial derivatives of higher order than the second in the Kramers-Moyal expansion. In order to accomplish this, it is first necessary to explain the concept of the continuous-time random walk (CTRW). [Pg.294]

We shall now demonstrate how the CTRW in the diffusion limit may be used to justify the fractional diffusion equation. We consider an assembly of permanent dipoles constrained to rotate about a fixed axis (the dipole is specified by the angular coordinate unit circle with fixed angular spacing A. We note that A may not necessarily be fixed for example, if we have a Gaussian distribution of jumps, the standard deviation of A serves as a fixed quantity. A typical dipole may remain in a fixed orientation at a given site for an arbitrary long waiting time. It may then reorient to another discrete orientation site. This is the discrete orientation model. [Pg.300]

To illustrate the method, we derive the diffusion equation corresponding to the discrete balance equation (3.13). For simplicity, we assume that the jump density is an even function, w(z) = w —z). We introduce the continuous-time variable t so that n = [ ], where [ ] denotes the integer part of a real number. Using (3.193), we obtain the rescaled density... [Pg.92]

Many of the mixing simulations described in the previous section deal with the modeling of mass transfer between miscible fluids [33, 70-77]. These are the simulations which require a solution of the convection-difliision equation for the concentration fields. For the most part, the transport of a dilute species with a typical diSusion coeflEcient 10 m s between two miscible fluids with equal physical properties is simulated. It has already been mentioned that due to the discretization of the convection-diffusion equation and the typically small diffusion coefficients for liquids, these simulations are prone to numerical diffiision, which may result in an over-prediction of mass transfer efficiency. Using a lattice Boltzmann method, however, Sullivan et al. [77] successfully simulated not only the diffusion of a passive tracer but also that of an active tracer, whereby two miscible fluids of different viscosities are mixed. In particular, they used a coupled hydrodynamic/mass transfer model, which enabled the effects of the tracer concentration on the local viscosity to be taken into account. [Pg.135]

The relationship between the Wiener integral (3.20) and the simple diffusion equation (3.21) suggests that it might be instructive to convert (6.12) to a differential equation. As also noted by Whittington, for the case of a discrete chain (6.12) can be expressed only in terms of the solution of a hierarchy of integro-differential equations. The derivation in the continuous case is presented in Appendix B for convenience, although the result is quoted here. Define the three-point Green s function as... [Pg.62]

The corresponding cylindrical development starts with the cylindrical diffusion equation (Eq, 2.7 the 2/r term in Eq. 3.42 is replaced with 1/r). Similar development to the above easily leads to the discrete form... [Pg.38]

We assume, for a start, the simple diffusion equation 5.12. We have seen in Sect. 5.1, that the normal explicit method, with its forward-difference discretisation of 8c/3t performs rather poorly, with an error of 0(6t). The discrete expression for the second derivative (right-hand side of Eq. 5.12) is better, with its error of 0(h ). Let us now imagine a time t+ig6t at this time, the discretisation... [Pg.81]

Note that equations 8.105 and 8.106 effectively define a simple discrete diffusion process in one dimension the presence of a threshold condition also makes the diffusion process a nonlinear one (see below). [Pg.439]

Fick s (continuum) laws of diffusion can be related to the discrete atomic processes of the random walk, and the diffusion coefficient defined in terms of Fick s law can be equated to the random-walk displacement of the atoms. Again it is easiest to use a one-dimensional random walk in which an atom is constrained to jump from one... [Pg.485]

Mixing models based on the CD model have discrete jumps in the composition vector, and thus cannot be represented by a diffusion process (i.e., in terms of and B ). Instead, they require a generalization of the theory of Markovian random processes that encompasses jump processes136 (Gardiner 1990). The corresponding governing equation... [Pg.316]


See other pages where The Discretized Diffusion Equation is mentioned: [Pg.5]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.1143]    [Pg.1153]    [Pg.1154]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.12]   


SEARCH



Diffusion Discretized

Diffusion equations

Discrete equation

The Diffusion

The diffusion equation

© 2024 chempedia.info