Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Test Standards and Accuracy

Despite what you might hear on the net, urinalysis, if done correctly, is a very accurate scientific procedure. I know of no labs that simply report the results of the initial EMIT screening without confirming the sample on GC/MS. The fact is, labs WANT you to test negative, because then they only have to run an EMIT test on your urine (a few cents). If you test positive, they must then confirm the positive result on GC/MS, which is considerably more expensive.. . . Incidentally, the machine which tests the hair is a relative of the GC/MS, but is FAR more precise. It can accurately detect levels of THC in a solution that are below 1 ng/mL  [Pg.29]

Not all labs are NIDA/CAP certified. Some labs do not properly and thoroughly clean the GC/MS equipment. Some labs do not even do a GC/MS confirmation Some labs use cheap alternative methods to reduce expenses. [Pg.30]

Many human errors occur in labs and cause inaccurate results. Some are careless or irresponsible errors, and some errors are accidents. Human error can ruin the results of ANY test, screening or confirmation GC/MS. [Pg.30]

The only lab you should be concerned with is the one that is testing you. Only federal jobs require NIDA standards. Your typical private employer may use any lab s/he chooses, which would very likely be the least expensive. Businesses don t always choose NIDA labs that follow-up a positive screening test with a confirmation GC/MS. [Pg.30]


See other pages where Test Standards and Accuracy is mentioned: [Pg.29]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.34]   


SEARCH



And accuracy

Standard test

© 2024 chempedia.info