Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Temperature mean-field

The scattering function of the lamellar phase near its high-temperature mean-field spinodal is shown in Fig. 1 for the qy = Q plane. The normal of the lamellar layers is taken to be in the z-direction. In addition to the two strong Bragg peaks at = ko, 0, and the two higher-order peaks... [Pg.441]

Table A2.3.5 Critical temperatures predicted by mean-field theory (MFT) and the quasi-chemical (QC) approximation compared with the exact results. Table A2.3.5 Critical temperatures predicted by mean-field theory (MFT) and the quasi-chemical (QC) approximation compared with the exact results.
This implies that the critical exponent y = 1, whether the critical temperature is approached from above or below, but the amplitudes are different by a factor of 2, as seen in our earlier discussion of mean-field theory. The critical exponents are the classical values a = 0, p = 1/2, 5 = 3 and y = 1. [Pg.538]

The integral under the heat capacity curve is an energy (or enthalpy as the case may be) and is more or less independent of the details of the model. The quasi-chemical treatment improved the heat capacity curve, making it sharper and narrower than the mean-field result, but it still remained finite at the critical point. Further improvements were made by Bethe with a second approximation, and by Kirkwood (1938). Figure A2.5.21 compares the various theoretical calculations [6]. These modifications lead to somewhat lower values of the critical temperature, which could be related to a flattening of the coexistence curve. Moreover, and perhaps more important, they show that a short-range order persists to higher temperatures, as it must because of the preference for unlike pairs the excess heat capacity shows a discontinuity, but it does not drop to zero as mean-field theories predict. Unfortunately these improvements are still analytic and in the vicinity of the critical point still yield a parabolic coexistence curve and a finite heat capacity just as the mean-field treatments do. [Pg.636]

Figure A2.5.26. Molar heat capacity C y of a van der Waals fluid as a fimction of temperature from mean-field theory (dotted line) from crossover theory (frill curve). Reproduced from [29] Kostrowicka Wyczalkowska A, Anisimov M A and Sengers J V 1999 Global crossover equation of state of a van der Waals fluid Fluid Phase Equilibria 158-160 532, figure 4, by pennission of Elsevier Science. Figure A2.5.26. Molar heat capacity C y of a van der Waals fluid as a fimction of temperature from mean-field theory (dotted line) from crossover theory (frill curve). Reproduced from [29] Kostrowicka Wyczalkowska A, Anisimov M A and Sengers J V 1999 Global crossover equation of state of a van der Waals fluid Fluid Phase Equilibria 158-160 532, figure 4, by pennission of Elsevier Science.
Figure A3.3.2 A schematic phase diagram for a typical binary mixture showmg stable, unstable and metastable regions according to a van der Waals mean field description. The coexistence curve (outer curve) and the spinodal curve (iimer curve) meet at the (upper) critical pomt. A critical quench corresponds to a sudden decrease in temperature along a constant order parameter (concentration) path passing through the critical point. Other constant order parameter paths ending within tire coexistence curve are called off-critical quenches. Figure A3.3.2 A schematic phase diagram for a typical binary mixture showmg stable, unstable and metastable regions according to a van der Waals mean field description. The coexistence curve (outer curve) and the spinodal curve (iimer curve) meet at the (upper) critical pomt. A critical quench corresponds to a sudden decrease in temperature along a constant order parameter (concentration) path passing through the critical point. Other constant order parameter paths ending within tire coexistence curve are called off-critical quenches.
As mentioned above, the interpretation of CL cannot be unified under a simple law, and one of the fundamental difficulties involved in luminescence analysis is the lack of information on the competing nonradiative processes present in the material. In addition, the influence of defects, the surface, and various external perturbations (such as temperature, electric field, and stress) have to be taken into account in quantitative CL analysis. All these make the quantification of CL intensities difficult. Correlations between dopant concentrations and such band-shape parameters as the peak energy and the half-width of the CL emission currently are more reliable as means for the quantitative analysis of the carrier concentration. [Pg.154]

In the inset of Fig. 9 we show the mean field frequency 0 = 0// as a function of density for T = 1. At this temperature the system undergoes a phase transition from a paramagnetic to a ferromagnetic fluid at a density whose mean field value is p mf = 0-4- For densities below this value we obtain 0 = cjq, which agrees with the frequency value of the low-order virial expansion (see Eq. (34)). For p > Pc,mF) increases with the density due to increase of the magnetization. [Pg.104]

FIG. 14 Phase diagram of the quantum APR model in the Q -T plane. The solid curve shows the line of continuous phase transitions from an ordered phase at low temperatures and small rotational constants to a disordered phase according to the mean-field approximation. The symbols show the transitions found by the finite-size scaling analysis of the path integral Monte Carlo data. The dashed line connecting these data is for visual help only. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. 328, Fig. 2. 1997, American Physical Society.)... [Pg.119]

In order to finally address the question whether our system has a reentrant phase transition, as predicted by the mean-field study the low temperature region was analyzed by the cumulant intersection finite-size scahng method described in Sec. IV A. For the rotational constant 0 = 0.6109 an... [Pg.120]

FIG. 9 Changes of the monolayer film critical temperature with the concentration of impurities obtained from the Monte Carlo simulations (open circles) and resulting from the mean field theory (solid line). (Reprinted from A. Patrykiejew. Monte Carlo studies of adsorption. II Localized monolayers on randomly heterogeneous surfaces. Thin Solid Films, 205 189-196, with permision from Elsevier Science.)... [Pg.274]

FIG. 13 Phase diagram of a vector lattice model for a balanced ternary amphiphilic system in the temperature vs surfactant concentration plane. W -I- O denotes a region of coexistence between oil- and water-rich phases, D a disordered phase, Lj an ordered phase which consists of alternating oil, amphiphile, water, and again amphi-phile sheets, and L/r an incommensurate lamellar phase (not present in mean field calculations). The data points are based on simulations at various system sizes on an fee lattice. (From Matsen and Sullivan [182]. Copyright 1994 APS.)... [Pg.661]

The result is valid below the roughening temperature, but above the roughening temperature this mean-field approximation is not sufficient... [Pg.865]

FIG. 2 Growth rates as a function of the driving force A//. Comparison of theory and computer simulation for different values of the diffusion length and at temperatures above and below the roughening temperature. The spinodal value corresponds to the metastability limit A//, of the mean-field theory [49]. The Wilson-Frenkel rate WF is the upper limit of the growth rate. [Pg.871]

This profile of the phase boundary determined here looks very similar to that obtained by the mean-field approximation (19), but the result here only applies to the profile above the roughening temperature. Since this is a mean-field theory, fluctuations are also not considered correctly. [Pg.879]

The rapid rise in computer speed over recent years has led to atom-based simulations of liquid crystals becoming an important new area of research. Molecular mechanics and Monte Carlo studies of isolated liquid crystal molecules are now routine. However, care must be taken to model properly the influence of a nematic mean field if information about molecular structure in a mesophase is required. The current state-of-the-art consists of studies of (in the order of) 100 molecules in the bulk, in contact with a surface, or in a bilayer in contact with a solvent. Current simulation times can extend to around 10 ns and are sufficient to observe the growth of mesophases from an isotropic liquid. The results from a number of studies look very promising, and a wealth of structural and dynamic data now exists for bulk phases, monolayers and bilayers. Continued development of force fields for liquid crystals will be particularly important in the next few years, and particular emphasis must be placed on the development of all-atom force fields that are able to reproduce liquid phase densities for small molecules. Without these it will be difficult to obtain accurate phase transition temperatures. It will also be necessary to extend atomistic models to several thousand molecules to remove major system size effects which are present in all current work. This will be greatly facilitated by modern parallel simulation methods that allow molecular dynamics simulations to be carried out in parallel on multi-processor systems [115]. [Pg.61]

We did not extensively discuss the consequences of lateral interactions of surface species adsorbed in adsorption overlayers. They lead to changes in the effective activation energies mainly because of consequences to the interaction energies in coadsorbed pretransition states. At lower temperatures, it can also lead to surface overlayer pattern formation due to phase separation. Such effects cannot be captured by mean-field statistical methods such as the microkinetics approaches but require treatment by dynamic Monte Carlo techniques as discussed in [25]. [Pg.30]


See other pages where Temperature mean-field is mentioned: [Pg.206]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.651]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.716]    [Pg.2368]    [Pg.2371]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.661]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.189]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.275 ]




SEARCH



Mean-field

Temperature field

Temperature, meaning

© 2024 chempedia.info