Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Chemical potential temperature coefficient

Transport coefficients of molecular model systems can be calculated by two methods [8] Equilibrium Green-Kubo (GK) methods where one evaluates the GK-relation for the transport coefficient in question by performing an equilibrium molecular dynamics (EMD) simulation and Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics (NEMD) methods. In the latter case one couples the system to a fictitious mechanical field. The algebraical expression for the field is chosen in such a way that the currents driven by the field are the same as the currents driven by real Navier-Stokes forces such as temperature gradients, chemical potential gradients or velocity gradients. By applying linear response theory one can prove that the zero field limit of the ratio of the current and the field is equal to the transport coefficient in question. [Pg.326]

Rastogi and co-workers [17, 18] have investigated that influence on magnitude of transport number in presence of temperature and chemical potential gradient. The results have been interpreted in terms of linear relations between fluxes and forces. Results suggest that the sign of difference between measured transport number and Hittorf s transport number depends on the sign of Soret coefficient [3, 4]. [Pg.89]

In the equilibrium state of the isolated system, d5 is equal to zero for an infinitesimal change of any of the independent variables. In this state, therefore, the coefficient of each term in the sums on the right side of Eq. 8.1.7 must be zero. We conclude that in an equilibrium state of a tall column of a pure gas, the temperature and chemical potential are uniform throughout. The equation, however, gives us no information about pressme. [Pg.195]

Powders of metals were prepared in various chemical ways, by means of electrolysis, and by means of Raney s method with a different procedure in the process (different initial alloys, different temperatures of leeching, etc.). The amount by which the leading-out electrode is dipped in the powder has no influence on the measured potential value. The temperature coefficient of potential is almost equal to the values for ordinary electrodes of the first kind, in the examined temperatures from 15°C to 35°C. As for copper and nickel we have found too that powders prepared in various ways and differing in their catal3rtic properties change the potential values of powder electrodes which have the same-solutions. Such powders also differ in the values of their counted out normal potentials. [Pg.242]

Because of the Onsager symmetry relation, r j = r, , only three coefficients are needed in the Equations [18.4] and [18.5], and six in the set Equations [18.9]-[18.12]. The nine coefficients needed were already determined by Inzoli et al (Inzoli et al, 2008,2009), and the values of the transport coefficients are shown in Fig. 18.5 (transport inside the membrane) and Fig. 18.6 (transport at the membrane surface). Altogether, the six equations and nine coefficients are sufficient to compute the profiles of the temperature and chemical potential across the heterogeneous system fully, for any set of inlet conditions on the /-side, or feed side. [Pg.635]

The coefficient of dE is the inverse absolute temperature as identified above. We now define the pressure and chemical potential of the system as... [Pg.392]

The chemical potential difference —ju may be resolved into its heat and entropy components in either of two ways the partial molar heat of dilution may be measured directly by calorimetric methods and the entropy of dilution calculated from the relationship A i = (AHi —AFi)/T where AFi=/xi —/x or the temperature coefficient of the activity (hence the temperature coefficient of the chemical potential) may be determined, and from it the heat and entropy of dilution can be calculated using the standard relationships... [Pg.516]

No heat is evolved when pure components that form an ideal solution are mixed. The validity of this statement can be shown from consideration of the temperature coefficient of the chemical potential. Again, from Equation (14.6) at fixed mole fraction. [Pg.322]

In this chapter, we shall consider the methods by which values of partial molar quantities and excess molar quantities can be obtained from experimental data. Most of the methods are applicable to any thermodynamic property J, but special emphasis will be placed on the partial molar volume and the partial molar enthalpy, which are needed to determine the pressure and temperature coefficients of the chemical potential, and on the excess molar volume and the excess molar enthalpy, which are needed to determine the pressure and temperature coefficients of the excess Gibbs function. Furthermore, the volume is tangible and easy to visualize hence, it serves well in an initial exposition of partial molar quantities and excess molar quantities. [Pg.407]

Notation-. T is the temperature, Vi the fluid velocity, II,j the viscous pressure tensor, Jg the heat current density, p its chemical potential, the current density of molecular species a, v J the stoichiometric coefficient (13), and Wp the speed of reaction p. [Pg.92]

In Flory s theory (/< ), a polymer-solvent system is characterized by a temperature 0 at which (i) excluded-volume effects are just balanced by polymer-solvent interactions, so that os=l, (ii) the second virial coefficient is zero, irrespective of the MW of the polymer, and (iii) the polymer, of infinite molecular weight, is just completely miscible with the solvent The fundamental definition of the temperature is a macroscopic one, namely that for T near 0 the excess chemical potential of the solvent in a solution of polymer volume fraction v2 is of the form (18) ... [Pg.21]

Finally in the case of the Ga-Sb and In-Sb binaries the relative chemical potentials of the Group III element in the liquid phase have been determined experimentally. The experimental value at x = and some temperature T = T can be matched exactly using Eq. (88). The left-hand side is the experimental value so that the equation can be used to express one asymmetric interaction coefficient, say , in terms of the other, /J13. [Pg.197]

A2 from equation (5.16) or the cross second virial coefficient from equation (5.17). In turn, this knowledge of the second virial coefficients and their temperature dependence allows calculation of the values of the chemical potentials of all components of the biopolymer solution or colloidal system, as well as enthalpic and entropic contributions to those chemical potentials. On the basis of this information, a full description and prediction of the thermodynamic behaviour can be realised (see chapter 3 and the first paragraph of this chapter for the details). [Pg.137]

The thermodynamic functions of fc-mers adsorbed in a simple model of quasi-one-dimensional nanotubes s adsorption potential are exactly evaluated. The adsorption sites are assumed to lie in a regular one-dimensional space, and calculations are carried out in the lattice-gas approximation. The coverage and temperature dependance of the free energy, chemical potential and entropy are given. The collective relaxation of density fluctuations is addressed the dependence of chemical diffusion coefficient on coverage and adsorbate size is calculated rigorously and related to features of the configurational entropy. [Pg.655]


See other pages where Chemical potential temperature coefficient is mentioned: [Pg.455]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.878]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.183]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.50 ]




SEARCH



Temperature chemical

Temperature coefficient

Temperature coefficient of the chemical potential

Temperature coefficient of the fugacity and standard chemical potential

© 2024 chempedia.info