Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Systems with weak chemical interactions

Inorganic oxopolymers can easily be generated in situ inside a soluble organic polymer as well as an organic component can easily be introduced into the oxide gels on simultaneous dissolution of the organic substances and the alkoxides. Both approaches lead to the formation of amorphous composites. [Pg.150]

In the case of the organic dye rhodamine, it has been demonstrated that the interaction of the molecules of dye with the oxide net in the course of forma- [Pg.150]

There are several kinds of such composites, including the polymers filled in situ by inorganic particles, hybrids formed on simultaneous formation of interpenetrating organic and inorganic networks, and materials obtained by the introduction of organic substances into the polymer inorganic networks. [Pg.151]

Introduction of organic molecules into an anisotropic inorganic network [Pg.151]

The gels can incorporate even polymers such as, for example, water-soluble polyethylene oxide (PEO), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and polypropyl-eneglycol (PPG). For the PE0/V205 system the interlayer broadening achieved 13.2 A, which corresponds to more probable placement of the polymer molecules along the layers [1373] (Fig. 11.1 b). [Pg.152]


In an ideal SEC separation, the mechanism is purely sieving, with no chemical interaction between the column matrix and the sample molecules. In practice, however, a small number of weakly charged groups on the surface of all TSK-GEL PW type packings can cause changes in elution order from that of an ideal system. Fortunately, the eluent composition can be varied greatly with TSK-GEL PW columns to be compatible with a wide range of neutral, polar, anionic, and cationic samples. Table 4.8 lists appropriate eluents for GFC of all polymer types on TSK-GEL PW type columns (11). [Pg.111]

Detailed studies about metal deposition from the gas phase onto SAMs have been published [108-110], The central question for the system substrate/SAM/deposit there (as well as in electrochemistry) is the exact location of the deposited metal On top of the SAM or underneath Three clearly different situations are easily foreseen (Fig. 31). (1) Metal on top of the SAM. Depending on a strong or weak chemical interaction between metal and SAM (e.g., functional end group of the SAM), the deposit will spread out on top of the SAM or it will cluster on the SAM. (2) Metal penetrating the SAM (e.g., at defects in the SAM) and connecting to the metal substrate underneath the SAM. This configuration is often pictured as a mushroom, with a thin connective neck and a large, bulky head. (3) Deposited metal is inserted be-... [Pg.143]

Usually adsorption, i.e. binding of foreign particles to the surface of a solid body, is distinguished as physical and chemical the difference lying in the type of adsorbate - adsorbent interaction. Physical adsorption is assumed to be a surface binding caused by polarization dipole-dipole Van-der-Vaals interaction whereas chemical adsorption, as any chemical interaction, stems from covalent forces with plausible involvement of electrostatic interaction. In contrast to chemisorption in which, as it has been already mentioned, an absorbed particle and adsorbent itself become a unified quantum mechanical system, the physical absorption only leads to a weak perturbation of the lattice of a solid body. [Pg.13]

However, for systems with a weak d-a electronic interaction, Vda <10 eV, minimization of the adiabatic gap to sufficient accuracy often is cumbersome it becomes a real challenge when one has to treat an open-shell system. In any case, the minimum spHtting method entails repeated quantum chemical calculations, a burden when very many couplings are to be evaluated along an MD trajectory. In that situation, one has to look for an alternative which permits direct treatment of off-resonance states. [Pg.43]

The strong chemical interaction of H with Cu(l 11) illustrates a wide variety of new chemical phenomena that are absent in the weak physisorption systems. The small mass and size of H even make some dynamic processes possible that are not present with other atom chemisorptions. [Pg.186]


See other pages where Systems with weak chemical interactions is mentioned: [Pg.150]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.2189]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.291]   


SEARCH



Chemical interaction

Interacting system

Interaction system

Weak interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info