System loss factor

Cf is the angular frequency of vibration, and T is defined as the system loss factor. Since the energy decay rate is ndis/ the power dissipated, it follows directly that 11 1 s = COTjW. Thus, we have the system loss factor T defined in a very basic way in energy and power terms as follows ... 

In such a case, the power dissipation rate is the sum of the several contributions, and the system energy is the sum of the several energies. We, therefore, have the familiar and useful definition of system loss factor as follows (I.) ... 

The above discussion implies steady-state response in time. An equivalent reciprocal view of steady-state resonance response is that in the vicinity of resonance there is a dip in the force required to maintain a constant level of response. The force-reduction ratio is Q, and the fractional bandwidth of the force reduction is T. In contrast, a truly force-free response of a resonant system (once excited) would involve the exponential decay of vibration amplitude with time. As we have mentioned earlier, decay is also controlled by the system loss factor as follows ... 

As we have noted above, the system loss factor defines the temporal decay of the system energy. Therefore, in considering the spatial decay of vibration, we find the "energy" speed (or "group velocity") Cg involved in the result ... 

The damping performance of a free layer treatment for plate bending waves is shown in Figure 4 (lH,UL) This chart, which is Oberst s result, gives the system loss factor T relative to T 2/ the loss factor of the viscoelastic material, as a function of the thickness ratio H2/H1 (viscoelastic layer to plate). Each of the several curves corresponds to a particular value of the relative Young s storage modulus E2/E1 (viscoelastic layer to plate). 

This description of the damping effectiveness of the free layer is clear and simple Its features are that system loss factor increases... 

We note here that for simplicity, we have implied that "best performance" means highest system loss factor. This is the case for a number of damping applications, but not for all cases. D. J. Mead (12., L2.) has noted the quantitative importance of other system parameters (stiffness and mass) in optimizing a damping treatment in cases where maximum loss factor is not the criterion of best performance (e.g., minimizing stress, acceleration, etc.). These considerations are particularly important in controlling structural fatigue and equipment malfunction. 

However, in the mid-frequency region, where the elastic energy in the viscoelastic layer can represent a useful fraction of the total, the system loss factor rises and passes through a maximum. Figure 5 shows this behavior with the wavelength X) dependence represented by a "shear parameter" y defined as follows ... 

The radar range equation was introduced in Sec. 17.1 In practice, estimation of the composite system loss factor and the system noise temperature can be very demanding. 

For lower voltage systems, say. 2.5 to lU kV, measurement of dielectric loss factor tan 5. along similar lines, to those recommended... 

Morris et al. [1.126] proposed to use dielectric analysis (DEA) to predict the collapse temperature of two component systems. The background of DEA is explained and the take off frequency (TOF) is chosen as the best analytical method to identify the collapse temperature. Figure 1.55.5 shows the dielectric loss factor as a function of the frequency. 

Loss, in lasers, 14 664-666 Loss factor, monitoring, 10 15 Loss-in-weight method, 26 248 Loss-in-weight systems, 26 249 Loss modulus, 20 346 21 722-723 Loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA), 17 577, 582, 595, 596... 

However, a series of factors introduce losses in the system namely, the reflectivities of the mirrors (RiandR2) on the figure, which reflect only a fraction, Ri and R2, of the intensity. Additional losses can be produced by absorption in the windows of the cell that contains the active medium (if this is the case), diffraction by apertures, and scattering due to particles or imperfect surfaces. All of those losses can be included in a loss factor per trip, expressed as e. Thus, considering both amplification and intensity decrease per round trip, the intensity after a single round trip through a resonator of length d is... 

All of these procedures involve heating T1203 in non-sealed systems, and all are typified by superconducting product stoichiometries far different from the starting compositions. Again, in addition to safety concerns, little control of superconducting-phase composition and reproducibility of synthetic conditions is afforded by use of non-hermetically sealed reaction containers. The problem appears to be more complex than simply thallium reactant loss factors related to reaction kinetics are most likely quite important for the preparation of these metastable phases. 

Figure 6.4 Decrease in the loss factor (tan 8) during cure, for the same epoxy-diamine system as that represented in Fig. 6.3, at different frequencies of the dynamic measurements. T] =70°C. (Matejka, 1991 - Copyright 2001 -Reprinted by permission of Springer-Verlag)... 

Morris et al. [1.126] proposed the use of dielectric analysis (DEA) to predict the collapse temperature of two-component systems. The background of DEA is explained and the >take-off frequency< (TOF) is chosen as the best analytical method to identify the collapse temperature. Figure 1.55.5 shows the dielectric loss factor as a function of the frequency. The frequency at the minimum of this curve is called TOF by the authors. TOF varies with the temperature as shown in Figure 1.55.6. The extrapolated intersection of the two linear portions identifies the collapse temperature. The predicted Tc by TOF for 10% sucrose, 10% trehalose, 10% sorbitol and 11% Azactam solution deviates from observations with a freeze-drying microscope (Table 1 in [1.126]) to slightly lower temperatures, the differences being -3, -1.4, 2.2 and 0.7 °C. 

Surfactant equilibrium isotherms and sorption envelopes on kaolinite were determined in triplicate batch experiments for the appropriate solution chemistry conditions. After equilibration, the solids were separated by centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 30 min and aliquots of the supernatant were taken for analysis. Residual SDS and Tween 80 concentrations (Ssurf, mM) were determined after taking into account dilution factors and system losses,... 

In the absence of a solvent-recovery method, entrainment is expected to be the major solvent-loss factor in all solvent-extraction applications [94], including CSSX [89], potentially amounting to several hundred ppm of the aqueous effluent. Solvent loss is known to be the economic determinant in most commercial solvent-extraction systems... 

The analysis in the subglass region allow to fit the loss factor permittivity by empirical equations. As in systems previously analyzed a reliable model to represent secondary relaxation is that of Fuoss-Kirkwood [9], Assuming that the two overlapped contributions for 8 and y relaxation are additive Sanchis and coworkers [64] have proposed the following equation ... 

The most important dielectric properties are the dielectric constant, e, and the dielectric loss factor, tan 8. These properties are of interest for alternating currents indicates the polarizability in an electric field, and, therefore, it governs the magnitude of the alternating current transmitted through the material when used in a capacitor. For most polymers e is between 2 and 5, but it may reach values up to 10 for filled systems. 

---