Surfactant molecular interactions evaluation

The two fundamental properties of surfactants are monolayer formation at interfaces and micelle formation in solution for surfactant mixtures, the characteristic phenomena are mixed monolayer formation at interfaces (Chapter 2, Section RIG) and mixed micelle formation in solution (Chapter 3, Section VIII). The molecular interaction parameters for mixed monolayer formation by two different surfactants at an interface can be evaluated using equations 11.1 and 11.2 which are based upon the application of nonideal solution theory to the thermodynamics of the system (Rosen, 1982) ... 

For evaluating the molecular interaction parameters for mixed micelle formation by two different surfactants, equations 11.3 and 11.4 (Rubingh, 1979) are used. 

The molecular interaction parameters evaluated using equations 11.1-11.4, together with the properties of the individual surfactants (see Section III below), are used to predict whether synergism of a particular type will occur when the two surfactants are mixed and, if so, the molar ratio of the two surfactants at which maximum synergism will exist and the relevant property of the mixture at that point. The particular interaction parameters used depend upon the nature of the interfacial phenomenon involved as described below. 

The procedure of evaluating self-diffusion data in terms of microstructure is to calculate the reduced or normalized diffusion coefficient, D/Dq, for the two solvents. Do being the neat solvent value under the appropriate conditions. Here we also have to account for reductions in D resulting from factors other than microstructure, mainly solvation effects. As discussed above, solvation will lead to a reduction of solvent diffusion that is proportional to the surfactant concentration. Normally the correction has been empirical and based on diffusion studies for cases of established structure, notably micellar solutions. We need to distinguish between corrections due to polar head-water and alkyl chain-oil interactions. The latter have often been considered insignificant, but a closer analysis (either experimental or theoretical) is lacking. However, it is probably reasonable to assume, for example, that the resistance to translation is not very different in the lipophilic part of the surfactant film and in an alkane solution. (This is supported by observations of molecular mobilities of surfactant allQ l chains on the same order of magnitude as for a neat hydrocarbon.)... 

---