Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Subshells definition

From these formulas and the definitions of fk (20.29) and (20.30) there follow directly simple expressions for the coefficients considered for one closed subshell, namely,... [Pg.243]

A 100 a realistic [FED77] proton shell is Z=38-50 for N<60 and Z=28-50 for N>60. Np Nn plots, subject to these definitions, are given in Figs. 1-2, They reveal that, again, a remarkable simplification results. Only the N 90 points in Fig. 1 deviate from a smooth curve this simply reflects the fact that the Z 64 gap is still partly intact for N 90. Indeed, one can exploit the otherwise smooth systematics by shifting these N 90 points to this smooth curve and extracting effective valence proton numbers that reflect the evolving proton subshell structure. [Pg.127]

The definition of basis sets involves the selection of a set of functions for each angular momentum of the atom. In non-relativistic calculations, is a good quantum number, but in relativistic calculations it is j or k which is the good quantum number. However for the lighter elements where the effects of relativity are small, is an approximately good quantum number, and basis sets for the spin-orbit components of a non-relativistic subshell can share exponents. Basis sets that are optimized with the same exponents for the two spin-orbit components are called -optimized. Similarly, basis... [Pg.275]

Similarly, the net orbital angular momentum of any filled subshell is zero. First of all, the orbital angular momentum in an s level is zero by definition. In a group of p levels, the possible values of m are — 1, 0, -I-1. If we place a pair of electrons in each of these p levels, then two electrons have m = — I, two have m = -1-1, two have m = 0. The net z component for all of these is zero since 2( — 1) -I- 2(0) -I- 2( -I-1) = 0. A filled subshell has no net component of orbital angular momentum around any specified axis, and so it contributes no magnetic moment due to orbital motion. [Pg.524]

The transition metals are the elements in Groups IB and 3B through 8B. Transition metals either have incompletely filled d subshells or readily produce cations with incompletely filled d Mibshells. According to this definition, the elements of Group 2B are not transition metals. They are tf-block elements, though, so they generally are included in the discussion of transition metals. [Pg.241]

The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (lUPAC) defines transition elements as those whose atoms or ions have an incomplete d subshell. This definition excludes Zn, Cd, and Hg. The problem is discussed in more detail in Chapter 21. [Pg.108]

Transition elements. How does the definition, Transition elements are those whose neutral atoms have partly filled d otf subshells differ from that given at the beginning of diis chapter Which definition includes more elements Name the elements covered only by the broader definition. [Pg.474]

The transition metals are, by definition, the elements with an incomplete d shell, and an empty last p shell (the valence one). These elements will need to complete more or less these subshells with electrons given or shared by the ligands in order to give rise to stable compounds. These electrons provided by the ligands allow the metal to reach more or less exactly the electronic structure of the rare gas following them on the same line of the periodic table. These notions will be refined later, but we will first examine the electron count given by the ligands to the transition metal. [Pg.23]

Notice the partially filled d subshells (see definition of transition element on the previous page) in the following examples of ions ... [Pg.378]

For X = K (no subshell) the number of X-ray photons emitted is given by Nk=N(Dk where N is the total number of K holes involved. Here N is equal to the sum of radiative and radiationless transitions. To a first approximation, K radiationless transition probability is nearly independent of Z, while radiative electric-dipole probability is proportional to Z. It justifies useful semiempirical laws based on q)kOcZ /(Z +c), c=constant. They are discussed in [4] which also gives many references on Auger and related processes up to 1971. Due to Coster-Kronig transitions, experimental and theoretical problems are more complicated for X = L, M,. .. Experimental data depend on the primary vacancy distribution which must remain unaltered before the vacancies are filled. Literature provides either total X-shell data(X = L, M,. ..) or partial Xj-subshelldata (Xj = L., Lg, L3,. ..). Definitions... [Pg.221]


See other pages where Subshells definition is mentioned: [Pg.158]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.932]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.289]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.31 ]




SEARCH



Subshell

Subshell, definition

Subshell, definition

Subshells

Subshells, atomic definition

© 2024 chempedia.info