Strain figure

Dislocation motion produces plastic strain. Figure 9.4 shows how the atoms rearrange as the dislocation moves through the crystal, and that, when one dislocation moves entirely through a crystal, the lower part is displaced under the upper by the distance b (called the Burgers vector). The same process is drawn, without the atoms, and using the symbol 1 for the position of the dislocation line, in Fig. 9.5. The way in... 

RBS and channeling are extremely useful for characterization of epitaxial layers. An example is the analysis of a Sii-j Gejc/Si strained layer superlattice [3.131]. Four pairs of layers, each approximately 40 nm thick, were grown by MBE on a <100> Si substrate. Because of the lattice mismatch between Sii-jcGe c (x a 0.2) and Si, the Sii-j Ge c layers are strained. Figure 3.51 shows RBS spectra obtained in random and channeling directions. The four pairs of layers are clearly seen in both the Ge and Si... 

The energy difference between axial and equatorial conformations is due to steric strain caused by 1,3-diaxial interactions. The axial methyl group on Cl is too close to the axial hydrogens three carbons away on C3 and C5, resulting in 7.6 kj/mol of steric strain (Figure 4.13). 

In comparing the correlation sought between MH and E one should emphasize the following while the plastic deformation of lamellae at larger strains when measuring MH depends primarily on crystal thickness and perfection in case of the elastic modulus the major role is played by the amorphous layer reinforced by tie molecules, which is elastically deformed at small strains. Figure 17 illustrates de... 

Data in Table 30.1 clearly show that, whatever the position of the test sample along the compounding line, there is a substantial difference between run 1 and run 2 data, particularly in what the linear modulus data are concerned. However, G is an extrapolated value and quite unrealistic values are obtained on certain samples, e.g., TR and AA, and it might be safer to consider modulus variations along the compounding line by using the (recalculated) complex modulus at 10% strain (Figure 30.13). 

The fiber industry has long been aware of PTT s good tensile elastic recovery [3], Ward et al. [4] studied the deformation behavior of PET, PTT and PBT fibers and found the tensile elastic recoveries were ranked in the unexpected descending order of PTT > PBT > PET. Chuah [47] found that the PTT elastic recovery and permanent set nearly tracked that of nylon 66 up to 30% strain (Figure 11.12). 

As early as 1829, the observation of grain boundaries was reported. But it was more than one hundred years later that the structure of dislocations in crystals was understood. Early ideas on strain-figures that move in elastic bodies date back to the turn of this century. Although the mathematical theory of dislocations in an elastic continuum was summarized by [V. Volterra (1907)], it did not really influence the theory of crystal plasticity. X-ray intensity measurements [C.G. Darwin (1914)] with single crystals indicated their mosaic structure (j.e., subgrain boundaries) formed by dislocation arrays. Prandtl, Masing, and Polanyi, and in particular [U. Dehlinger (1929)] came close to the modern concept of line imperfections, which can move in a crystal lattice and induce plastic deformation. 

This instrument operates by applying an oscillatory, sinusoidal stress and records the strain (Figure 17.16). The solid line corresponds to the applied stress, controlled by the instrument, and the sample s response strain appears as the dotted line. The rheometer measures the variation in strain as a function of applied stress and reports... 

---