Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Stokes theorem electrodynamics

The non-Abelian Stokes theorem gives the homogeneous field equation of 0(3) electrodynamics, a Jacobi identity in the following integral form ... [Pg.80]

These field equations are therefore the result of a non-Abelian Stokes theorem that can also be used to compute the electromagnetic phase in 0(3) electrodynamics. It turns out that all interferometric and physical optical effects are described self-consistently on the 0(3) level, but not on the U(l) level, a result of major importance. This result means that the 0(3) (or SO(3) = SU(2)/Z2) field equations must be accepted as the fundamental equations of electrodynamics. [Pg.82]

Therefore, the distinction between the topological and dynamical phase has vanished, and the realization has been reached that the phase in optics and electrodynamics is a line integral, related to an area integral over Bt3> by a non-Abelian Stokes theorem, Eq. (553), applied with 0(3) symmetry-covariant derivatives. It is essential to understand that a non-Abelian Stokes theorem must be applied, as in Eq. (553), and not the ordinary Stokes theorem. We have also argued, earlier, how the non-Abelian Stokes explains the Aharonov-Bohm effect without difficulty. [Pg.92]

Equation (482) is a simple form of the non-Abelian Stokes theorem, a form that is derived by a round trip in Minkowski spacetime [46]. It has been adapted directly for the 0(3) invariant phase factor as in Eq. (547), which gives a simple and accurate description of the Sagnac effect [44], A U(l) invariant electrodynamics has failed to describe the Sagnac effect for nearly 90 years, and kinematic explanations are also unsatisfactory [50], In an 0(3) or SU(2) invariant electrodynamics, the Sagnac effect is simply a round trip in Minkowski space-time and an effect of special relativity and gauge theory, the most successful theory of the late twentieth century. There are open questions in special relativity [108], but no theory has yet evolved to replace it. [Pg.98]


See other pages where Stokes theorem electrodynamics is mentioned: [Pg.92]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.149]   


SEARCH



Theorem Stokes

© 2024 chempedia.info