Spinor transformation

Abstract Hilbert space, 426 Accuracy of computed root, 78 Acharga, R., 498,539,560 Additive Gaussian noise channel, 242 Adjoint spinor transformation under Lorentz transformation, 533 Admissible wave function, 552 Aitkin s method, 79 Akhiezer, A., 723 Algebra, Clifford, 520 Algebraic problem, 52 linear, 53... 

We exemplify the procedure of determining the spinor transformation properties under molecular point group operations for the Czv double group. Other double groups can be treated analogously. The character tables of the 32 molecular double groups may be found, e.g., in Ref. 68. 

According to this matrix formulation the quaternion, also known as a rotation operator or spinor transformation, becomes... 

Equation (19) then yields the double-valued spinor transformation ... 

Figure 2. Symmetry adapted graphical representation of a (6 spinor, 3 electron) space. The totally symmetric irrep is F,. The spinors transform according to the fermion irreps T4 through Fft.

The most significant difference of Dirac s results from those of the non-relativistic Pauli equation is that the orbital angular momentum and spin of an electron in a central field are no longer separate constants of the motion. Only the components of J = L - - S and J, which commute with the Hamiltonian, emerge as conserved quantities [1]. Dirac s equation, extended to general relativity by the method of projective relativity [2], automatically ensures invariance with respect to gauge, coordinate and spinor transformations, but has never been solved in this form. 

Equation (9-369) allows us to infer that the transformation of the adjoint spinor under Lorentz transformation is given by... 

Transformation properties of Dirac spinors in particular under inversions Marshak, R. E., and Sudarshan, E. C. G., Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics, Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1961. 

The requirement of Postulate 3 that the equations of motion be form-invariant (i.e., that fix ) and A u(x ) satisfy the same equation of motion with respect to a as did fx) and Au x) with respect to x demands that the field variables transform under such transformations according to a finite dimensional representation of the Lorentz group. In other words it demands that transform like a spinor... 

The right side is again determined by the fact that tjr(x) must transform like a spinor under a homogeneous Lorentz transformation. Its form is made transparent by recalling that for an infinitesimal homogeneous Louentz transformation... 

This is verified by applying U(a,A) to the left and U(a,A) l to the right of both sides of Eqs. (11-142) and (11-97), mid making use of the transformation properties of (11-184) and (11-185) of the fields. Equations (11-241) and (11-242) were to be expected. They guarantee that four-vector, respectively. We are now in a position to discuss the transformation properties of the one-particle states. Consider the one-negaton state, p,s,—e>. Upon taking the adjoint of Eq. (11-241) and multiplying by ya we obtain... 

As we can see, the FW two-component wave function is not the large component of the Dirac spinor, but it is related to it by an expression involving X. Consider a similarity transformation based on U parameterized as... 

As seen from equation (50), the ESC Hamiltonian is energy dependent and Hermitian. For a fixed value of E, the ESC Hamiltonian can be diagonalized and the resulting solutions, in principle, form a complete orthonormal set. The eigenfunctions of are identical to the large component of the Dirac spinor. When Z — 0, equations (38) and (44) give us the similarity transformed Hamiltonian... 

Abstract. An application of the Rayleigh-Ritz variational method to solving the Dirac-Coulomb equation, although resulted in many successful implementations, is far from being trivial and there are still many unresolved questions. Usually, the variational principle is applied to this equation in the standard, Dirac-Pauli, representation. All observables derived from the Dirac equation are invariant with respect to the choice of the representation (i.e. to a similarity transformation in the four-dimensional spinor space). However, in order to control the behavior of the variational energy, the trial functions are subjected to several conditions, as for example the kinetic balance condition. These conditions are usually representation-dependent. The aim of this work is an analysis of some consequences of this dependence. 

It is easy to see that Eq. (1) is invariant with respect to a similarity transformation in the four-dimensional spinor space. If k and E are solutions of Eq. (1) then... 

Hence, at low momenta the photon-nucleus interaction vertex (after the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation and transition to the two-component nuclear spinors) is described by the expression... 

Relativity becomes important for elements heavier than the first row transition elements. Most methods applicable on molecules are derived from the Dirac equation. The Dirac equation itself is difficult to use, since it involves a description of the wave function as a four component spinor. The Dirac equation can be approximately brought to a two-component form using e.g. the Foldy-Wouthuysen (FW) transformational,12]. Unfortunately the FW transformation, as originally proposed, is both quite complicated and also divergent in the expansion in the momentum (for large momenta), and it can thus only be carried out approximately (usually to low orders). The resulting equations are not variationally stable, and they are used only in first order perturbation theory. 

Turning now to the case of polarization/rotation modulation, or continuous rotation of iT i 2rl2 corresponding to a continuous rotation of Cj through 20, there is a rotation of the resultant through 0. This correspondence is a consequence of the A 1A = 7 relation, namely, that if the unitary transformation of A or A 1 is applied separately the identity matrix will not be obtained. However, if the unitary transformation is applied twice, then the identity matrix is obtained and from this follows the remarkable properties of spinors that corresponding to two unitary transformations of, for example, 27i, namely, 471, one null vector rotation of 271 is obtained. This is a bisphere correspondence and is shown in Fig 3b. This figure also represents the case of polarization/rotation modulation—as opposed to static polarization/rotation. 

---