Spin relaxation field dependence

Both spin-lattice and spin-spin relaxation depend on rates of molecular motion, for relaxation results from the interaction of fluctuating magnetic fields set up by nuclei in the spin system and in the lattice. A quantitative theory of this dependence was given by Bloembergen et al., who obtained... 

Powder spectra of paramagnetic compounds measured with applied fields are generally more complicated than those shown in Fig. 4.14. Large internal fields at the Mossbauer nucleus that are temperature- and field-dependent give rise to this complication. If, however, the measurement is performed at sufficiently high temperature, which is above ca. 150 K, the internal magnetic fields usually collapse due to fast relaxation of the electronic spin system (vide infra, Chap. 6). Under... 

The story is even more complicated than we have suggested, because carbon can relax by more than one mechanism. Protons rely on dipole-dipole relaxation, which also works well for protonated carbons but badly for non-proton-ated carbons. But carbon also for example makes use of spin-rotation relaxation, which is particularly active for methyl groups. And the magnetic field dependence of the various mechanisms also differs. We realize that relaxation is a very difficult subject, and if you want to know more then there are plenty of textbooks available ... 

The muon spin relaxation technique uses the implantation and subsequent decay of muons, n+, in matter. The muon has a polarized spin of 1/2 [22]. When implanted, the muons interact with the local magnetic field and decay (lifetime = 2.2 ps) by emitting a positron preferentially in the direction of polarization. Adequately positioned detectors are then used to determine the asymmetry of this decay as a function of time, A t). This function is thus dependant on the distribution of internal magnetic fields within a... 

The relaxation rates in Eqs. (12) and (13) depend now on the magnetic field in a more complicated way. Not only are the Larmor frequencies in the denominators of the Lorentzians proportional to the field, the electron spin relaxation rates are, in principle, also field-dependent. 

The Bloembergen-Morgan equations, Eqs. (14) and (15), predict that the electron spin relaxation rates should disperse at around msTy = 1. This will make the correlation times for the dipolar and scalar interaction, %ci and respectively, in Eq. (11) dependent on the magnetic field. A combination of the modified Solomon-Bloembergen equations (12) and (13), for nuclear relaxation rates with the Bloembergen-Morgan equations for the field dependence... 

The assumption of a single electron spin and a single T2 holds usually for S = 1/2 and for S > 1 in certain limits. Let us assume that the instantaneous distortions of the solvation sphere of the ion result in a transient ZFS and that the time-dependence of the transient ZFS can be described by the pseudorotation model, with the magnitude of the transient ZFS equal to At and the correlation time t . The simple picture of electron relaxation for S = 1 is valid if the Redfield condition (Att <5c 1) applies. Under the extreme narrowing conditions ((Os v 1), the longitudinal and transverse electron spin relaxation rates are equal to each other and to the low-field limit rate Tgo, occurring in Eqs. (14) and (15). The low field-limit rate is then given by (27,86) ... 

---