Spin intermolecular

Chuang C, Andrews P M and Lester M I 1995 Intermolecular vibrations and spin-orbit predissooiation dynamios of NeOH J. Chem. Phys. 103 3418-29... 

The application of RPR in the detection and quantification of species formed by spin-trapping the products of radical-monomer reactions is described in Section 3.5.2.1, The application of time-resolved F.PR spectroscopy to study intermolecular radical-alkene reactions in solution is mentioned in Section 3.5.1. 

Here, is the magnetization of spin i at thermal equilibrium, p,j is the direct, dipole-dipole relaxation between spins i and j, a-y is the crossrelaxation between spins i and j, and pf is the direct relaxation of spin i due to other relaxation mechanisms, including intermolecular dipolar interactions and paramagnetic relaxation by dissolved oxygen. Under experimental conditions so chosen that dipolar interactions constitute the dominant relaxation-mechanism, and intermolecular interactions have been minimized by sufficient dilution and degassing of the sample, the quantity pf in Eq. 3b becomes much smaller than the direct, intramolecular, dipolar interactions, that is. 

The carbon atoms which are involved in the short intermolecular contacts between molecules (less than 4A 02/C14 and 01/C4, C5, C6, Figure 7) carry a significant spin density. The magnetic molecular orbitals of the corresponding oxygen atoms (01 and 02) are twisted and hybridized. Thus we have evidence that the intermolecular exchange involves these contacts. 

Work on intermolecular energy transfer at low temperature from a donor (D) to an acceptor (A) has indicated that if a donor is prepared such that its triplet state has a unique spin direction, the acceptor will also have a unique and predictable direction when both donor and acceptor are oriented in a single crystal. 27 ... 

A third possible channel of S state deexcitation is the S) —> Ti transition -nonradiative intersystem crossing isc. In principle, this process is spin forbidden, however, there are different intra- and intermolecular factors (spin-orbital coupling, heavy atom effect, and some others), which favor this process. With the rates kisc = 107-109 s"1, it can compete with other channels of S) state deactivation. At normal conditions in solutions, the nonradiative deexcitation of the triplet state T , kTm, is predominant over phosphorescence, which is the radiative deactivation of the T state. This transition is also spin-forbidden and its rate, kj, is low. Therefore, normally, phosphorescence is observed at low temperatures or in rigid (polymers, crystals) matrices, and the lifetimes of triplet state xT at such conditions may be quite long, up to a few seconds. Obviously, the phosphorescence spectrum is located at wavelengths longer than the fluorescence spectrum (see the bottom of Fig. 1). 

Minima in Ti are usually above the So hypersurface, but in some cases, below it (ground state triplet species). In the latter case, the photochemical process proper is over once relaxation into the minimum occurs, although under most conditions further ground-state chemistry is bound to follow, e.g., intermolecular reactions of triplet carbene. On the other hand, if the molecule ends up in a minimum in Ti which lies above So, radiative or non-radiative return to So occurs similarly as from a minimum in Si. However, both of these modes of return are slowed down considerably in the Ti ->-So process, because of its spin-forbidden nature, at least in molecules containing light atoms, and there will usually be time for vibrational motions to reach thermal equilibrium. One can therefore not expect funnels in the Ti surface, at least not in light-atom molecules. 

---