Sphere viscosity

Apart from chemical composition, an important variable in the description of emulsions is the volume fraction, outer phase. For spherical droplets, of radius a, the volume fraction is given by the number density, n, times the spherical volume, 0 = Ava nl2>. It is easy to show that the maximum packing fraction of spheres is 0 = 0.74 (see Problem XIV-2). Many physical properties of emulsions can be characterized by their volume fraction. The viscosity of a dilute suspension of rigid spheres is an example where the Einstein limiting law is [2]... 

We call the correlation time it is equal to 1/6 Dj, where Dj is the rotational diffusion coefficient. The correlation time increases with increasing molecular size and with increasing solvent viscosity, equation Bl.13.11 and equation B 1.13.12 describe the rotational Brownian motion of a rigid sphere in a continuous and isotropic medium. With the Lorentzian spectral densities of equation B 1.13.12. it is simple to calculate the relevant transition probabilities. In this way, we can use e.g. equation B 1.13.5 to obtain for a carbon-13... 

For dilute dispersions of hard spheres, Einstein s viscosity equation predicts... 

Viscosity. On the assumption that moiecuies interact iiise hard spheres, the viscosity of a gas is... 

A somewhat similar problem arises in describing the viscosity of a suspension of spherical particles. This problem was analyzed by Einstein in 1906, with some corrections appearing in 1911. As we did with Stokes law, we shall only present qualitative arguments which give plausibility to the final form. The fact that it took Einstein 5 years to work out the bugs in this theory is an indication of the complexity of the formal analysis. Derivations of both the Stokes and Einstein equations which do not require vector calculus have been presented by Lauffer [Ref. 3]. The latter derivations are at about the same level of difficulty as most of the mathematics in this book. We shall only hint at the direction of Lauffer s derivation, however, since our interest in rigid spheres is marginal, at best. 

This is only one of the contributions to the total volume rate of energy dissipation a second term which arises from explicit consideration of the individual spheres must also be taken into account. This second effect can be shown to equal 1.5 [Pg.588]

This concludes our discussion of the viscosity of polymer solutions per se, although various aspects of the viscous resistance to particle motion continue to appear in the remainder of the chapter. We began this chapter by discussing the intrinsic viscosity and the friction factor for rigid spheres. Now that we have developed the intrinsic viscosity well beyond that first introduction, we shall do the same (more or less) for the friction factor. We turn to this in the next section, considering the relationship between the friction factor and diffusion. 

All that can be concluded from the data given in the preceding example is that the particle is not an unsolvated sphere. However, when an appropriate display of contours is examined for f/fo (e.g.. Ref. 2), the latter is found to be consistent with an unsolvated particle of axial ratio about 4 1 or with a spherical particle hydrated to the extent of about 0.48 g water (g polymer). Of course, there are a number of combinations of these variables which are also possible, and some additional experimental data—such as the intrinsic viscosity—are needed to select that combination which is consistent with all experimental observations. 

Falling ball viscometers are based on Stokes law, which relates the viscosity of a Newtonian fluid to the velocity of the falling sphere. If a sphere is allowed to fall freely through a fluid, it accelerates until the viscous force is exactly the same as the gravitational force. The Stokes equation relating viscosity to the fall of a soHd body through a Hquid may be written as equation 34, where ris the radius of the sphere and d are the density of the sphere and the hquid, respectively g is the gravitational force and p is the velocity of the sphere. 

The speed at which a sphere roUs down a cylindrical tube filled with a fluid or down an angled plate covered with a film of the fluid also gives a measure of viscosity. For the cylindrical tube geometry, equation 35, a generalized form of the Stokes equation is used for any given instmment, where p is the translational velocity of the rolling sphere and k is the instmment constant determined by caUbration with standard fluids. 

Pxampk 2. A smooth spherical body of projected area Al moves through a fluid of density p and viscosity p with speed O. The total drag 8 encountered by the sphere is to be determined. Clearly, the total drag 8 is a function of O, Al, p, and p. As before, mass length /, and time t are chosen as the reference dimensions. From Table 1 the dimensional matrix is (eq. 23) ... 

In addition, dimensional analysis can be used in the design of scale experiments. For example, if a spherical storage tank of diameter dis to be constmcted, the problem is to determine windload at a velocity p. Equations 34 and 36 indicate that, once the drag coefficient Cg is known, the drag can be calculated from Cg immediately. But Cg is uniquely determined by the value of the Reynolds number Ke. Thus, a scale model can be set up to simulate the Reynolds number of the spherical tank. To this end, let a sphere of diameter tC be immersed in a fluid of density p and viscosity ]1 and towed at the speed of p o. Requiting that this model experiment have the same Reynolds number as the spherical storage tank gives... 

Hindered Settling When particle concentration increases, particle settling velocities decrease oecause of hydrodynamic interaction between particles and the upward motion of displaced liquid. The suspension viscosity increases. Hindered setthng is normally encountered in sedimentation and transport of concentrated slurries. Below 0.1 percent volumetric particle concentration, there is less than a 1 percent reduction in settling velocity. Several expressions have been given to estimate the effect of particle volume fraction on settling velocity. Maude and Whitmore Br. J. Appl. Fhys., 9, 477—482 [1958]) give, for uniformly sized spheres,... 

Stokes diameter is defined as the diameter of a sphere having the same density and the same velocity as the particle in a fluid of the same density and viscosity settling under laminar flow conditions. Correction for deviation from Stokes law may be necessary at the large end of the size range. Sedimentation methods are limited to sizes above a [Lm due to the onset of thermal diffusion (Brownian motion) at smaller sizes. 

The resistance to liquid flow aroimd particles may be presented by an equation similar to the viscosity equation but with considering the void fraction. Recall that the shear stress is expressed by the ratio of the drag force, R, to the active surface, K27td. The total sphere surface is Ttd and Kj is the coefficient accoimting for that part of the surface responsible for resistance. Considering the influence of void fraction as a function 2( ). we obtain ... 

---