Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Speech Research Laboratory

The student may well feel that the need to name inorganic compounds is a relic of the past, when stoichiometric formulae were often uncertain, and that a formula will convey a more concise specification of a substance. This attitude is not without merit, especially where we are dealing with rather complex substances whose systematic names are hopelessly clumsy and lengthy. For example, the important substance rendered as IrCl(CO)(PPh3)2 on the printed page has the systematic name trans-chlorocarbonylbis(triphenylphosphine)iridium(I). Although hundreds of papers have been published on the reactions of this compound and tens of thousands of students have heard of it, the systematic name is rarely used. In speech, and often in print, it is given the trivial name Vaska s compound . In any research laboratory, you may hear talk of Judy s compound , or Ralph s anion . [Pg.88]

Nelson WR and Mozo BT (1985). Effects of XM-40 chemical protective mask on peal-ear attenuation and speech intelligibility characteristics of the SPH-4 aviator helmet, Report 85-2. Fort Rucker, AL, USA US Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory. [Pg.172]

Java applets, http //svm.dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk/. These SVM classification and regression Java applets were developed by members of Royal Holloway, University of London, and the AT T Speech and Image Processing Services Research Laboratory. SVM classification is available from http //svm.dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk/pagesnew/ GPat.shtml. SVM regression is available at http //svm.dcs.rhbnc.ac.uk/pagesnew/ ID-Reg.shtml. [Pg.390]

A sense of the increasing presence of computers in chemical research and the new possibilities being opened up can be gained from a statement made by Mulliken in his 1966 Nobel Prize speech 1 would like to emphasize strongly my belief that the era of computing chemists, when hundreds if not thousands of chemists will go to the computing machine instead of the laboratory for increasingly many facets of information is already at hand. ... [Pg.11]

In 1844 Gerhardt became professor at Montpellier, after a provisional appointment in 1841. Wurtz says His teaching was serious and elevated but he threw no deep roots. Gerhardt gave a better impression by his writings than by his speech. Gerhardt was not satisfied with his position the climate did not suit him, his laboratory was inadequate, no funds were provided for apparatus and chemicals, provincial professors were not expected to do research, and he had to clean his own apparatus (no great hardship). He asked Cahours to place his dissatisfaction before Dumas, but the latter advised him to do some more... [Pg.405]


See other pages where Speech Research Laboratory is mentioned: [Pg.8]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.2148]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.1178]    [Pg.722]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.1269]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.1243]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 ]




SEARCH



Laboratories, research

Speech

© 2024 chempedia.info