Solvent Distance

The first term tends to make the capacitance greater for increasing qM. For the interface in vacuum, this term is outweighed by the other, so that the calculated capacitance decreases with qM, reflecting the fact that it is easier to spill more electrons out into the vacuum than to push them back into the metal againtst the repulsive forces. In the metal-solution interface, however, it is surmised92 

The dependence of dx on qM is central in a model, proposed by Price and Halley,93 for the metal surface in the double layer which is related to that discussed above. The positively charged ion background profile p+(z) is assumed uniform, with a value equal to the bulk density pb, from z = -oo to z = 0, with the electronic density profile n(z) more diffuse. In contrast to the previous model30 which emphasizes penetration by the conduction electrons of the region of solvent, this model93 supposes that the density profile n(z) is zero for z dx, where z dx defines the region of the electrolyte. Then the potential at dx is given by 

The last (dipole) term is supposed to be approximated by the truncated Taylor series 

Guidelli,16 reviewing work on the capacitance of the metal-electrolyte interface, writes the equation for calculating capacitances from models for the inner layer as  

---

According to these considerations three subregions are defined as depicted in Fig. 1. The inner and outer parts of the QM region are termed the QM core and QM layer zone, respectively. As discussed solutes in the QM core do not require the application of non-Coulombic potentials—composite species with complex potential energy surfaces can be treated in a straightforward way, while complex potential functions are required in the case of classical and even conventional QM/MM simulation studies. Interactions at close solute-solvent distances are treated exclusively via quantum mechanics and account for polarization, charge transfer, as well as many-body effects. The solute-solvent... 

One of these, electron transfer, actually occurs in the ideal definitional sense. It applies to the few overworked redox reactions where there is no adsorbed intermediate. The ion in a cathodic transfer is located in the interfacial region and receives an electron (ferric becomes ferrous) without the nucleus of the ion moving. Later (perhaps as much as 10-9 s later), a rearrangement of the hydration sheath completes itself because that for the newly produced ferrous ion in equilibrium differs (in equilibrium) substantially from that for the ferric. Now (even in the electron transfer case) the ion moves, but the definition remains intact because it moves after electron transfer. The amounts of such small movements (changes in the ion-solvent distance for Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in equilibrium) are now known from EXAFS measurements. 

The eluent is dioxane (72%)-methanol (28%) 0 solvent. Distances are measured from the dip line rather than the spotting line. 

We should hasten to note that these fundamental difficulties do not mean that this theory does not often work. The most common application of IBC theory points to its particularly simple prediction for the dependence of relaxation rates on the thermodynamic state of the solvent with the Enskog estimate of collision rates, the ratio of vibrational relaxation rates at two different liquid densities p and p2 is just the ratio of the local solvent densities [pigi(R)//02g2(R)], where g(r) is the solute-solvent radial distribution function and R defines the solute-solvent distance at... 

A compared with 2.35 A for the octahedral dimer. An explanation on the basis of the higher steric demands in the octahedral dimer seems plausible. It is surprising, however, that such high solvent distances are not observed in crystal structure data. If one assumes that the Joyner statistic test has failed in the present case another interpretation of the data is required. An octahedral geometry can no longer be assumed, although all other conclusions remain correct. 

Concerning the origin of the peculiar behavior, two models have been proposed and coexisted for long time, which attribute quite different physics to solvent response to a solute displacement. The first model, often referred to as the solventberg model, maintains the classical view of Stokes law but with an effective ionic radius, or the Stokes radius, which takes into account the effect of solvation solvent molecules are regarded firmly bound to the ion, and the radius of the solvated ion plays a role of the Stokes radius. The Stokes radius in this model decreases with increasing ionic radius since the ion-solvent interaction is weakened due to the increased ion-solvent distance. The solventberg model has... 

---