Solvation standard thermodynamic functions

The standard thermodynamic functions of solvation defined as above indicated by superscript differ from the generally tabulated standard thermodynamic functions indicated by superscript0 due to the constraints of fixed positions. They therefore lack the changes in the translational degrees of freedom, due to the compression from the volume of the gaseous state to that in the solution, not relevant to the solvation of the solute. Thus, AH = AH0 + RT (1 - ap7), where ap is the isobaric expansibility of the solvent, AS = AS0 + R( - ap7), AV = AV° - (RT/P°) -1 + ktP°), where kt is the isothermal compressibility of the solvent, and so on. 

Results for the standard thermodynamic functions, temperature derivatives thereof leading to and TA S° are shown in the review by Marcus and Hefter [29] for many electrolytes in several solvents. Some of these data are shown in Table 7.4. For the ion pairing of the thallium halides in the solvents shown in this table, the association is enthalpy driven, pointing to CIP formation with some coordinative bonding. For the other ion pairs shown, the association is entropy driven, for even if there are only 2SIPs being formed, fewer particles result in the solution than when only free solvated ions exist. 

Whether obtained from an actual experimentally feasible process or from a thought process, As i Gg, which is obtained from Eq. (2.9) by re-arrangement, pertains to the solvation of the solute and expresses the totality of the solute-solvent interactions. It is a thermodynamic function of state, and so are its derivatives with respect to the temperature (the standard molar entropy of solvation) or pressure. This means that it is immaterial how the process is carried out, and only the initial state (the ideal gaseous solute B and the pure liquid solvent) and the final state (the dilute solution of B in the liquid) must be specified. 

An alternative procedure to gain deeper insight into the physico-chemical basis of solvation consists of the partitioning of AGsoi into its enthalpic, A//soi, and en-tropic, A.S(o, components. Taken together, these quantities represent a substantial reservoir of information about the interactions between solute and solvent molecules. Moreover, these quantities are state functions and can be rigorously derived by using standard thermodynamic relationships, as noted in Eqs. 4-2 and 4-3. Finally, the availability of experimentally measured data for the enthalpy and entropy of solvation makes it possible to calibrate the reliability of theoretical models to predict those thermodynamic quantities. 

Once thermodynamic corrections were made based upon the standard reduction potentials, solvation data, etc., the free energy may be plotted as a function of the electrochemical potential by taking into account the number of electrons being consumed or released as a result of the particular adsorption process being considered [125]. These reactions include... 

We close this section with a reminder of a fnndamental issue in electrochemistry Not all the quantities in Equations 13.8 throngh 13.13 are accessible to measurement by electrochemical or thermodynamic methods. Only the electrochemical potential ( i ), the work function (W ) or equivalently the real potential (a ) and the Volta potential ( / ) are. Equations 13.9, 13.11, and 13.13 are therefore formal resolutions. It is not possible to assign actual values to the separate terms, the chemical potential ( t ), the Galvani potential (cp ), nor the surface potential (x ), without making extrathermodynamic assumptions. These quantities must therefore be considered unphysical, at least from the point of view of thermodynamics. This statement, which is called the Gibbs-Guggenheim Principle in [42], is often met with disbelief from theoretical and computational chemists, particularly in the case of the chemical potential (Equation 13.10). The standard chemical potential is essentially the (absolute) solvation free energy AjG of species i. One would hope that a molecular simulation contains all information needed to compute AjG . Indeed, there seems to be a way around this thermodynamic verdict for computation and also mass spectroscopic. This continues to be, however, hazardous territory, particularly for DFT calculations in periodic systems. ... 

Certain thermodynamic quantities may also serve for obtaining the preferential solvation of ions. The main quantity of interest in this respect is the standard molar Gibbs energy of transfer of the ion P from a source solvent (generally but not necessarily one of the components, say A) to the mixture A G °(I, A A+B) as a function of JCg. Rarely... 

---