Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Soil degradation laboratory study, 334, Table

Table 6.4 shows first-order rate coefficients and tx/2 values for degradation of a number of pesticides in soils (Rao and Davidson, 1982). The k and t1/2 values calculated from field data are based on the disappearance of the parent compound (solvent extractable). Table 6.4 also includes k and t1/2 values calculated on mineralization (14C02 evolution) and parent-compound disappearance from laboratory studies. The t1/2 values were smaller for field than for laboratory studies. Rao and Davidson (1980) attribute this to the multitude of factors that can affect pesticide disappearance in the field while only one factor is studied in the laboratory. Rao and Davidson (1982) suggested that pesticides be classified into three groups based on values (Table 6.5) nonpersistent (t1/2 < 20 days), moderately persistent (20 < t1/2 < 100 days), and persistent (/1/2 > 100 days). Most chlorinated hydrocarbons are grouped as persistent, while carboxyl-kanoic acid herbicides are nonpersistent. The s-triazines, substituted ureas, and carbamate pesticides are moderately persistent. [Pg.140]

The rate of degradation of the herbicide triclopyr at 35°C, has been evaluated in laboratory studies using soils that differed in organic carbon content (Table 9.9) and the data fitted to a two-compartment model ... [Pg.341]


See other pages where Soil degradation laboratory study, 334, Table is mentioned: [Pg.333]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.355]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.5 , Pg.9 ]




SEARCH



Degradation studies

Degradative studies

Laboratory studies

Soil degradation Table

Soil, table

Soils degradation

© 2024 chempedia.info