Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Snakes, tongue-flicking

Gillingham J. and Clark D. (1981). Snake tongue-flicking transfer mechanisms to Jacobson s Organ. Can J Zool 59, 1651-157. [Pg.207]

Halpern, M. and Kubie, J.L. (1983) Snake tongue flicking behavior Clues to vomeronasal system functions. In R.M. Silverstein and D. Muller Schwarze, (Eds.), Chemical Signals III. Plenum Publishing Corp, New York, pp. 45-72. [Pg.355]

Halpern, M., and Kubie, J., 1983, Snake tongue flicking behavior Clues... [Pg.277]

Gillingham, J. C., and Clark, D. L., 1981, Snake tongue flicking Transfer mechanisms of Jacobson s organ. Can. J. Zool., 59 1651. [Pg.321]

Fig. 7.3 Chemoinvestigation among snakes and lizards by tongue-flicks. Fig. 7.3 Chemoinvestigation among snakes and lizards by tongue-flicks.
Gove D. (1979). A comparative study of snake and lizard tongue-flicking, with an evolutionary hypothesis. Z Tierpsychol 51, 58-76. [Pg.208]

Patterns of Tongue-Flicking by Garter Snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) during Presentation of Chemicals under Varying Conditions... [Pg.344]

It is well known that the chemical senses play a critical role in the behavior of snakes (Halpern, 1987, 1992 Mason 1992 and Schwenk 1995). Tongue-flicking, a chemosensory behavior pattern unique to snakes and lizards (Gove 1979 Schwenk 1993), serves as the primary vehicle for transfer of chemical substances to the vomeronasal organ (Burghardt and Pruitt 1975 Graves and Halpern 1989 Halpern and Kubie 1980 Kahmann 1932 Wilde 1938). Snakes have well-developed vomeronasal systems and flick their tongues in response to odorants perceived in their environment. [Pg.344]

Snakes were trained to look for earthworm bits in a plastic 5-arm radial maze (similar to that used by Kubie and Halpern 1978,1979). At the beginning of every trial, the snake was placed in an open-ended cylinder placed in the center of the foraging apparatus. After 1 minute, the cylinder was lifted and the snake was allowed to explore the apparatus. During training, the goal box at the end of each arm of the maze was baited with earthworm bits to encourage the animal to enter each arm in search of food. Tongue-flick data was recorded before and after prey consumption. [Pg.348]

A square field (80 x 80 cm), with a milk-glass floor, marked off in 5 cm squares, opaque walls and a clear Plexiglas top was used. Snakes were placed in an open-ended cylinder and placed in the middle of the apparatus and the snake was allowed 1 minute to adapt. The cylinder was lifted and the snake was allowed to explore the apparatus for one minute during which tongue-flicks were videotaped. No prey or prey odor was ever placed in this apparatus. [Pg.348]

As previously reported (Halpern and Kubie 1983 Kubie and Halpern 1978) tongue-flick rates varied as a function of extract concentration (Fi.2,6.2 = 12.85, p = 0.009) with tongue-flick rates greatest when the snakes were following high concentration trails (IX) and lowest at the weakest concentration (1/8IX) and dry trails (Table 33.1). As expected from the above, tongue-flick initiation intervals, the inverse of tongue-flick rates, also varied as a function of earthworm extract con-... [Pg.349]

Traversing a maze in which no proximate odor cues are present, but in which snakes have previously received rewards was here defined as a foraging task. Such a task permits one to analyze tongue-flick patterns before and after prey consumption. [Pg.351]

Fig. 33.2 Autocorrelations calculated on the time-series of tongue-flick duration scores for snake S6 during trailing of IX earthworm extract... Fig. 33.2 Autocorrelations calculated on the time-series of tongue-flick duration scores for snake S6 during trailing of IX earthworm extract...
Six snakes were tested with airborne odors from earthworm wash, fish water, live earthworm, dE O, amyl acetate and lemon extract (Table 33.1). Tongue-flick rates increase during odorant delivery compared to before or after odorant delivery (Halpern et al. 1997 Halpern and Kubie 1983 Zuri and Halpern 2003). [Pg.354]

We have previously suggested (Halpern and Kubie 1983) that tongue-flicking in snakes can be classified as a sense-seeking behavior, similar to sniffing, ear and eye movements. A major function of tongue-flicking is certainly to collect informa-... [Pg.354]

Gove, D. and Burghardt, G.M. (1983) Context-correlated parameters of snake and lizard tongue-flicking. Anim. Behav. 31, 718-723. [Pg.355]

Garter snakes identify their species by tongue flicking at non-volatile, integumentary lipids which they also use in courtship and following conspecific trails. The levels of these lipids fluctuate with hormonal state, skin-shed state, and season (Mason, 1992). [Pg.143]


See other pages where Snakes, tongue-flicking is mentioned: [Pg.343]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.97]   


SEARCH



Snake

Snakes, tongue-flicking patterns

Snaking

Tongue

Tongue flicking behavior, snakes

Tongue flicking garter snakes

© 2024 chempedia.info