Simple reaction coordinates

To find the activated complex, a convenient method is the so-called linear synchronous transit (LST) method (Halgren and Lipscomb, 1977). In this method, the two stable end-member geometries are interpolated to produce a simple reaction coordinate. In the LST scheme the reaction coordinate, /(0c/ 1), is essentially an interpolation parameter between the interatomic... 

Simple reaction coordinate A coordinate for which there is a quadratic dependence of energy on a suitable progress variable along that coordinate... 

Reaction dimension One of the edges of a reaction dimension corresponding to a simple reaction coordinate... 

Progress variable Numerical measure of the extent to which a simple reaction coordinate has progressed from the initial to the final value. Normally defined so as to mn from 0 (initial state) to 1 (final state)... 

Sometimes no simple reaction coordinate exists. In the rare cases in which the transition state is symmetric, say hydrogen abstraction from methane by a methyl group, symmetry constraints can be applied. 

It is implicit in this traditional Transition State Theory (TST) view that equilibrium solvation applies in the reaction, i.e., that at each stage along the simple reaction coordinate (such as the - X separation in the S l case), the solvent is equilibrated to the reaction system. 

A transition structure is the molecular species that corresponds to the top of the potential energy curve in a simple, one-dimensional, reaction coordinate diagram. The energy of this species is needed in order to determine the energy barrier to reaction and thus the reaction rate. A general rule of thumb is that reactions with a barrier of 21 kcal/mol or less will proceed readily at room temperature. The geometry of a transition structure is also an important piece of information for describing the reaction mechanism. 

Given the foregoing assumptions, it is a simple matter to construct an expression for the transition state theory rate constant as the probability of (1) reaching the transition state dividing surface and (2) having a momenrnm along the reaction coordinate directed from reactant to product. Stated another way, is the equilibrium flux of reactant states across... 

In simple chemical systems, it is often possible to make a good first guess at the dominant reaction pathway [25-28]. An example of such a reaction is the chair-to-boat isomerization in cyclohexane. In that pathway, a clever combination of two torsion angles provides an excellent reaction coordinate for the isomerization reaction [29,30]. 

According to this very simple derivation and result, the position of the transition state along the reaction coordinate is determined solely by AG° (a thermodynamic quantity) and AG (a kinetic quantity). Of course, the potential energy profile of Fig. 5-15, upon which Eq. (5-60) is based, is very unrealistic, but, quite remarkably, it is found that the precise nature of the profile is not important to the result provided certain criteria are met, and Miller " obtained Eq. (5-60) using an arc length minimization criterion. Murdoch has analyzed Eq. (5-60) in detail. Equation (5-60) can be considered a quantitative formulation of the Hammond postulate. The transition state in Fig. 5-9 was located with the aid of Eq. (5-60). 

Let us assume a reaction coordinate x running from 0 (reactant) to 1 (product). The energy of the reactant as a function of x is taken as a simple parabola with a force constant of a. The energy of the product is also taken as a parabola with the same force constant, but offset by the reaction energy AEq- The position of the TS (jc ) is taken as the point where the two parabola intersect, as shown in Figure 15.27. The TS position is calculated by equating the two energy expressions. 

Tilley and co-workers reported the isolation of coordinatively unsaturated complexes Cp Ru(L)Cl (Cp =/j -C-sMes, L = PCy3 and P Pr ) by a simple reaction with the tetrameric species fCp RuCI]4. This synthetic pathway has allowed us... 

Figure 2.4. Reaction coordinate diagram for a simple chemical reaction. The reactant A is converted to product B. The R curve represents the potential energy surface of the reactant and the P curve the potential energy surface of the product. Thermal activation leads to an over-the-barrier process at transition state X. The vibrational states have been shown for the reactant A. As temperature increases, the higher energy vibrational states are occupied leading to increased penetration of the P curve below the classical transition state, and therefore increased tunnelling probability.

Rates of addition to carbonyls (or expulsion to regenerate a carbonyl) can be estimated by appropriate forms of Marcus Theory. " These reactions are often subject to general acid/base catalysis, so that it is commonly necessary to use Multidimensional Marcus Theory (MMT) - to allow for the variable importance of different proton transfer modes. This approach treats a concerted reaction as the result of several orthogonal processes, each of which has its own reaction coordinate and its own intrinsic barrier independent of the other coordinates. If an intrinsic barrier for the simple addition process is available then this is a satisfactory procedure. Intrinsic barriers are generally insensitive to the reactivity of the species, although for very reactive carbonyl compounds one finds that the intrinsic barrier becomes variable. ... 

Alternatively one can make use of No Barrier Theory (NBT), which allows calculation of the free energy of activation for such reactions with no need for an empirical intrinsic barrier. This approach treats a real chemical reaction as a result of several simple processes for each of which the energy would be a quadratic function of a suitable reaction coordinate. This allows interpolation of the reaction hypersurface a search for the lowest saddle point gives the free energy of activation. This method has been applied to enolate formation, ketene hydration, carbonyl hydration, decarboxylation, and the addition of water to carbocations. ... 

A simple example serves to illnstrate the similarities between a reaction mechanism with a conventional intermediate and a reaction mechanism with a conical intersection. Consider Scheme 9.2 for the photochemical di-tt-methane rearrangement. Chemical intnition snggests two possible key intermediate structures, II and III. Computations conhrm that, for the singlet photochemical di-Jt-methane rearrangement, structure III is a conical intersection that divides the excited-state branch of the reaction coordinate from the ground state branch. In contrast, structure II is a conventional biradical intermediate for the triplet reaction. 

---