Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Simple One-Moment Averages

According to these equations, the following always holds  [Pg.293]

8 Molar Masses and Molar Mass Distributions [Pg.294]

This expression can never be less than unity. Analogous inequalities may also be written for (Xz)l(Xw), (Xz i) jiXz) etc. [Pg.294]

A numerical example may clarify these ratios. Assume there are three fractions A, B, and C, which are mixed together according to their mass fractions Wi. Each fraction also has a degree of polymerization distribution which is characterized by individual number, mass, andz averages (Table 8-1). The number, mass, andz averages of the mixture are, according to Equations (8-44)-(8-46), [Pg.294]


When p = q = 1, equation (8-38) reduces to that of a simple one-moment average. [Pg.291]

The simple one-moment degree of polymerization averages are related to each other by... [Pg.291]

With respect to molecular dipole moment, a previous comparative analysis of the experimental data of 125 (mostly quite simple) compounds yielded average absolute errors of 0.38 (PM3), 0.35 (AMI), and 0.45 D (MNDO) (Stewart, 1989b). For a compound set of 256 (again generally more simple) compounds with experimental first ionization potentials (as one of the target properties of... [Pg.125]

A simple calculation shows that the first moment for the nonlinear equation is identical with that of the linear equation. Since the first moment is the average energy and the processes which give rise to the nonlinear term conserve energy, this is also intuitively obvious. Furthermore, it can be seen from the form of the nonlinear term that one can find convex functions for which the nonlinear term is zero locally, even in fairly large domains. Finally, as mentioned above for equilibrium-like distributions such as exp (—a ) (and the discrete equivalent) the nonlinear term vanishes identically. All this indicates that it may play a less important role than originally believed. [Pg.224]

As already mentioned, one of the main weaknesses of the simple reflection method is the fact that the electronic transition dipole moment, (or the transition dipole moment surface, TDMS for polyatomic molecules in Section 4) is assumed to be constant. This weakness will remain in the Formulae (12), (27) and (29) derived below. The average value of the square of the TDM (or TDMS) is then included in amplitude A and A = A /V. In Formulae (3), (3 ) and (3") the mass (or isotopologue) dependent parameters are p and the ZPE. In contrast, W and V., which define the upper potential, are mass independent. This Formula (3) is already known even if different notations have been used by various authors. As an example, Schinke has derived the same formula in his book [6], pages 81, 102 and 111. Now, the model will be improved by including the contribution of the second derivative of the upper potential at Re- The polynomial expansion of the upper potential up to second order in R - Re) can be expressed as ... [Pg.79]

In engineering practice only very simple statistics of turbulence is used based on the average (mean), the fluctuation (standard deviation) and the second moment (fluxes) taken at one point in space (i.e., one point time correlation functions). [Pg.118]

When more than one state of a system is to be investigated, it is possible to perform separate MCSCF calculations, followed by MRCI calculations, on each state. This, however, can be a very expensive process, and if transition properties between states are desired, such as transition dipole moments for spectroscopic intensities, the nonorthogonality between the MCSCF orbitals for the different states creates complications. A simple alternative is to perform an MCSCF optimization of a single average energy for all states of interest. All states are thereby described using a common set of MOs. Although these MOs are obviously not optimum for any of the states, experience shows this has little effect on the final MRCI results. [Pg.108]

For sufficiently small field intensities the apparent average moment of one molecule is thus proportional to the field intensity, E. Therefore instead of the simple relation given by equation (10), m = osoJS, the total electric moment is given by... [Pg.415]


See other pages where Simple One-Moment Averages is mentioned: [Pg.293]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.1239]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.1239]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.164]   


SEARCH



Average moment

© 2024 chempedia.info