Semiempirical wave functions electronic states

CIS calculations from the semiempirical wave function can be used for computing electronic excited states. Some software packages allow Cl calculations other than CIS to be performed from the semiempirical reference space. This is a good technique for modeling compounds that are not described properly by a single-determinant wave function (see Chapter 26). Semiempirical Cl... 

In a more complex situation than that of two electrons occupying each its orbital one can expect much more sophisticated interconnections between the total spin and two-electron densities than those demonstrated above. The general statement follows from the theorem given in [72] which states that no one-electron density can depend on the permutation symmetry properties and thus on the total spin of the wave function. For that reason the difference between states of different total spin is concentrated in the cumulant. If there is no cumulant there is no chance to describe this difference. This explains to some extent the failure of almost 40 years of attempts to squeeze the TMCs into the semiempirical HFR theory by extending the variety of the two-electron integrals included in the parameterization. 

The ground-state wave function of cytosine has been calculated by practically all the semiempirical as well as nonempirical methods. Here, we shall discuss the application of these methods to interpret the experimental quantities that can. be calculated from the molecular orbitals of cytosines and are related to the distribution of electron densities in the molecules. The simplest v-HMO method yielded a great mass of useful information concerning the structure and the properties of biological molecules including cytosines. The reader is referred to the book1 Quantum Biochemistry for the application of this method to interpret the physicochemical properties of biomolecules. Here we will restrict our attention to the results of the v-SCF MO and the all-valence or all-electron treatments of cytosines. 

Abstract. We have calculated the scalar and tensor dipole polarizabilities (/3) and hyperpolarizabilities (7) of excited ls2p Po, ls2p P2- states of helium. Our theory includes fine structure of triplet sublevels. Semiempirical and accurate electron-correlated wave functions have been used to determine the static values of j3 and 7. Numerical calculations are carried out using sums of oscillator strengths and, alternatively, with the Green function for the excited valence electron. Specifically, we present results for the integral over the continuum, for second- and fourth-order matrix elements. The corresponding estimations indicate that these corrections are of the order of 23% for the scalar part of polarizability and only of the order of 3% for the tensor part... 

For a many-eicctron system, the Hartree-Fock wave function Fhi. defined as the product of spin orbitals Xi ss outlined in Equation 28-SI. where A(n) is an antisymmetrirer for the electrons, provides good answers. This is the starting point for either semiempirical or ab initio theory. It is necessary to have 4(n) to make the wave function antisymmetric. thus obeying the Pauli exclusion principle, which asserts that two electrons cannot be in the same quantum state. 

As already noted, all the examples in the preceding section refer to SCF ab initio wave functions, which do not take into account electron correlation. It is well known, however, that the SCF approximation at the Hartree-Fock limit is good enough to give a reliable representation of a one-electron, first-order observable like the electronic potential, at least for closed-shell ground-state systems like those considered here. If we keep to the field of SCF ab initio wave functions, the differences in accuracy between several wave functions for the same molecule depend upon the adequacy of the expansion basis set / employed in the calculations. In the next paragraph, however, we will also treat the case of semiempirical SCF wave functions. 

Abstract We review and further develop the excited state structural analysis (ESSA) which was proposed many years ago [Luzanov AV (1980) Russ Chem Rev 49 1033] for semiempirical models of r r -transitions and which was extended quite recently to the time-dependent density functional theory. Herein we discuss ESSA with some new features (generalized bond orders, similarity measures etc.) and provide additional applications of the ESSA to various topics of spectrochemistry and photochemistry. The illustrations focus primarily on the visualization of electronic transitions by portraying the excitation localization on atoms and molecular fragments and by detaiUng excited state structure using specialized charge transfer numbers. An extension of ESSA to general-type wave functions is briefly considered. 

Today we know that the HF method gives a very precise description of the electronic structure for most closed-shell molecules in their ground electronic state. The molecular structure and physical properties can be computed with only small errors. The electron density is well described. The HF wave function is also used as a reference in treatments of electron correlation, such as perturbation theory (MP2), configuration interaction (Cl), coupled-cluster (CC) theory, etc. Many semi-empirical procedures, such as CNDO, INDO, the Pariser-Parr-Pople method for rr-eleetron systems, ete. are based on the HF method. Density functional theory (DFT) can be considered as HF theory that includes a semiempirical estimate of the correlation error. The HF theory is the basie building block in modern quantum chemistry, and the basic entity in HF theory is the moleeular orbital. 

A third approach, the one most important for the current discussions, is to treat the electric-field as a source of perturbation of the total molecular energy using real and virtual excited state transitions. This approach uses electronic wave functions either for all of the electrons of the molecule (ab initio calculations) or for only the valence electrons (so-called semiempirical theories). Semiempirical Hamiltonians may ignore electron interactions completely (Huckel theory). They may assume one jt-orbital per carbon and assume no overlap between adjacent electron orbitals (Pariser-Parr-Pople or PPP). Or, they may include both the a and... 

---