Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Screening agreements

Screening Agreement Between Compound Providers and the NCI DCTD. [Pg.32]

We have presented a method to analyze the composite displacement and rotation movements. On Tables 1 and 2 we can see the agreement between the experimental values and that obtained from equations (1) or (2). This technique allows to follow the movement in real time, observing directly on the PC screen the ring size and position variations. In this way, we can determine the center and the radius of the ring. [Pg.659]

The agreement is satisfactory, except in the cases where there are deviations from additivity. This fact is a verification of our treatment and of the correctness of our screening constants, for the arbitrary selection of only one ionic radius in a series of salts showing additivity in inter-atomic distances is permitted, and our screening constants fixed four radii independently. [Pg.266]

We shall now predict values of SE for ions for which z4/Z is small, i.e., for Z large. If this screening constant is constant, and does not depend on Z, these values hold for all atoms and ions with the structures considered. The nature of the agreement between the theoretical and the experimental values of R or of SE will show to what extent this is true. [Pg.690]

The experimental results are in complete agreement with the predictions of our computational screening approach the annealed BiPt sample shows enhanced HER activity compared with pure Pt. As mentioned above, this result is rather counterintuitive, given that Bi itself is a notoriously poor electrocatalyst for the HER [Trasatti, 1972]. Hence, it appears that our computational, combinatorial screening procedure is capable of identifying improved catalysts for electrochemical reactions that are not immediately apparent from simple intuitive arguments. [Pg.87]

A comparison with Burchard s first cumulant calculations shows qualitative agreement, in particular with respect to the position of the minimum. Quantitatively, however, important differences are obvious. Both the sharpness as well as the amplitude of the phenomenon are underestimated. These deviations may originate from an overestimation of the hydrodynamic interaction between segments. Since a star of high f internally compromises a semi-dilute solution, the back-flow field of solvent molecules will be partly screened [40,117]. Thus, the effects of hydrodynamic interaction, which in general eases the renormalization effects owing to S(Q) [152], are expected to be weaker than assumed in the cumulant calculations and thus the minimum should be more pronounced than calculated. Furthermore, since for Gaussian chains the relaxation rate decreases... [Pg.99]


See other pages where Screening agreements is mentioned: [Pg.32]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.1810]    [Pg.2209]    [Pg.2226]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.692]    [Pg.711]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.738]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.80]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.32 , Pg.33 ]




SEARCH



Agreements

© 2024 chempedia.info