Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Scanning electron micrographs for

Figure 4. Scanning electron micrograph for the deposit obtained from acidified zinc sulfate electrolyte (9) (0.77M Zn", 7M H2SOh) containing 40 ppb Sb, X 920... Figure 4. Scanning electron micrograph for the deposit obtained from acidified zinc sulfate electrolyte (9) (0.77M Zn", 7M H2SOh) containing 40 ppb Sb, X 920...
Figure 8. Charge collection scanning electron micrographs for a gold-polycrystalline n-GaAs junction (a) before and (b) after Rtf treatment. The darker the area the less the recombination. Figure 8. Charge collection scanning electron micrographs for a gold-polycrystalline n-GaAs junction (a) before and (b) after Rtf treatment. The darker the area the less the recombination.
Scanning electron micrographs for particles of Cu2OCl2 obtained with the ultrasonic nozzle with an optimised power setting had an estimated size of 100 nanometers to 30 microns. [Pg.240]

A number of authors demonstrated the porous structures of their monoliths using scanning electron micrographs (for example [14,32,33,49,63]. Some of these pictures are also shown throughout this chapter. Although these micrographs are impressive and visualize the macroporous structure, they do not enable a quantitative determination of parameters of the porous structure. [Pg.234]

Fig. 9. Scanning electron micrographs for Al electrode polarized at 5.0 V vs Li/Li+ for 1 h in propylene carbonate containing (a) 1.0 mol dm"3 LiCF3S03 and (b) 1.0 mol dm"3 Li(CF3S02)iN (reproduced with permission from J. Power Sources, in press [57], Battery Technol., 10 (1998) 85 [56]). Fig. 9. Scanning electron micrographs for Al electrode polarized at 5.0 V vs Li/Li+ for 1 h in propylene carbonate containing (a) 1.0 mol dm"3 LiCF3S03 and (b) 1.0 mol dm"3 Li(CF3S02)iN (reproduced with permission from J. Power Sources, in press [57], Battery Technol., 10 (1998) 85 [56]).
Figure 14.9 Scanning electron micrographs for the surface of Al oxydized (a) up to 5.5 V in 0.4 mol dm- LiTFSI/EC-DMC and (b) up to 6.5 V in 0.4 mol dm UTFSI/PP13-TFSI. The Al surface tvas scratched in an Ar atmosphere by emery paper before the electrochemical reaction. (Reproduced from Sakaebe and Matsumoto [29])... Figure 14.9 Scanning electron micrographs for the surface of Al oxydized (a) up to 5.5 V in 0.4 mol dm- LiTFSI/EC-DMC and (b) up to 6.5 V in 0.4 mol dm UTFSI/PP13-TFSI. The Al surface tvas scratched in an Ar atmosphere by emery paper before the electrochemical reaction. (Reproduced from Sakaebe and Matsumoto [29])...
Figure 5 shows typical scanning electron micrographs for micronized (M-SX) and supercritically produced (S-SX) salmeterol particles. Table 3 summarizes the most important physical parameters for these powders included in the present dispersion model. Although the materials are similar in platelet morphology, S-SX consists of thirmer particles with much smaller sphericity than the micronized sample. Less than 1% density difference between these crystals is too small to produce any noticeable changes in the aerodynamic behavior. By contrast, a relatively large value of the aerody-... [Pg.267]

Figure 6-7. Scanning electron micrographs for yttrium oxide particles obtained by calcination of yttrium oxalate particles for 6h at 823 K. (a) and 1073 K (b). (Reprodueed with permission from ref. 60. Copyright 1998 American Chemical Society)... Figure 6-7. Scanning electron micrographs for yttrium oxide particles obtained by calcination of yttrium oxalate particles for 6h at 823 K. (a) and 1073 K (b). (Reprodueed with permission from ref. 60. Copyright 1998 American Chemical Society)...
Figure 4 Scanning electron micrographs for imprinted polymer microspheres against (a) 17P-estradiol (b) (5)-propranolol. Figure 4 Scanning electron micrographs for imprinted polymer microspheres against (a) 17P-estradiol (b) (5)-propranolol.
Figure 5 A scanning electron micrograph for MIP beads prepared against Boc-L-Phe using suspension polymerization in perfluorocarbon liquid. Reprinted in part with permission from Ref. 21. Copyright (1996) American Chemical Society. Figure 5 A scanning electron micrograph for MIP beads prepared against Boc-L-Phe using suspension polymerization in perfluorocarbon liquid. Reprinted in part with permission from Ref. 21. Copyright (1996) American Chemical Society.
Figure 7 Molecular imprinting using porous silica beads as support. Scanning electron micrographs for (a) porous silica bead support (b) silica-MIP composite beads and (c) MIP beads after removal of the support. Figure 7 Molecular imprinting using porous silica beads as support. Scanning electron micrographs for (a) porous silica bead support (b) silica-MIP composite beads and (c) MIP beads after removal of the support.
Fig. 14.2 Scanning electron micrograph for PP/jute fiber composite... Fig. 14.2 Scanning electron micrograph for PP/jute fiber composite...

See other pages where Scanning electron micrographs for is mentioned: [Pg.306]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.672]    [Pg.414]   


SEARCH



Electron micrograph

Electron micrographs

Electron micrographs, scanning

Scanning electron micrograph

Scanning electron micrographic

© 2024 chempedia.info