Scaleup of laminar flow reactors

Chapter 3 introduced the basic concepts of scaleup for tubular reactors. The theory developed in this chapter allows scaleup of laminar flow reactors on a more substantive basis. Model-based scaleup supposes that the reactor is reasonably well understood at the pilot scale and that a model of the proposed plant-scale reactor predicts performance that is acceptable, although possibly worse than that achieved in the pilot reactor. So be it. If you trust the model, go for it. The alternative is blind scaleup, where the pilot reactor produces good product and where the scaleup is based on general principles and high hopes. There are situations where blind scaleup is the best choice based on business considerations but given your druthers, go for model-based scaleup. 

Consider the scaleup of a small, tubular reactor in which diffusion of both mass and heat is important. As a practical matter, the same fluid, the same inlet temperature, and the same mean residence time will be used in the small and large reactors. Substitute fluids and cold-flow models are sometimes used to study the fluid mechanics of a reactor, but not the kinetics of the reaction. 

---

Solution The approach is similar to that in Example 3.7. The unknowns are Sl and (Em)2. Set (Poudi = (Pout) - Equation (3.40) is used to calculate iPm)2 nd Equation (3.41) is used to calculate Sl- Results are given in Table 3.2. The results are qualitatively similar to those for the turbulent flow of a gas, but the scaled reactors are longer and the pressure drops are lower. In both cases, the reader should recall that the ideal gas law was assumed. This may become unrealistic for higher pressures. In Table 3.2 we make the additional assumption of laminar flow in both the large and small reactors. This assumption will be violated if the scaleup factor is large. 

TABLE 3.2 Series Scaleup of Gas-Phase Reactors in Laminar Flow... 

The temperature counterpart of Q>aVR ccj-F/R and if ccj-F/R is low enough, then the reactor will be adiabatic. Since aj 3>a, the situation of an adiabatic, laminar flow reactor is rare. Should it occur, then T i, will be the same in the small and large reactors, and blind scaleup is possible. More commonly, ari/R wiU be so large that radial diffusion of heat will be significant in the small reactor. The extent of radial diffusion will lessen upon scaleup, leading to the possibility of thermal runaway. If model-based scaleup predicts a reasonable outcome, go for it. Otherwise, consider scaling in series or parallel. 

The series scaleup of a gas phase reactor requires two ancillary equations that can be deduced from Example 3.5. The form of the equations depends on whether the flow is turbulent or laminar ... 

As shown in the previous section, scaling with geometric similarity, Sr = Sl = gives constant pressure drop when the flow is laminar and remains laminar upon scaleup. This is true for both liquids and gases. The Reynolds number and the external area increase as. Piston flow is a poor assumption for laminar flow in anyfhing but small tubes. Conversion and selectivity of the reaction is likely to worsen upon scaleup unless the pilot reactor is already so large that molecular and thermal diffusion are negligible on the pilot scale. Ways to avoid unpleasant surprises are discussed in Chapter 8... 

For laminar flow of a Newtonian fluid, scaleup at constant pressure drop is identical to scaleup with geometric similarity. For constant pressure drop in turbulent flow, the reactor diameter increases somewhat faster, than for scaleup with... 

---