Ruthenium reactivity patterns

An interesting finding was made by changing of the connectivity (1,1 instead of 1,2) of the central olefin moiety of the substrate, that is, the usual diene product 324 from the skeletal rearrangement was observed in this case (Scheme 83). The fact that by using rhodium instead of platinum or ruthenium, the reactivity pattern is totally different also suggests all the subtlety and complexity of the mechanism of these transformations.302... 

The olefin binding site is presumed to be cis to the carbene and trans to one of the chlorides. Subsequent dissociation of a phosphine paves the way for the formation of a 14-electron metallacycle G which upon cycloreversion generates a pro ductive intermediate [ 11 ]. The metallacycle formation is the rate determining step. The observed reactivity pattern of the pre-catalyst outlined above and the kinetic data presently available support this mechanistic picture. The fact that the catalytic activity of ruthenium carbene complexes 1 maybe significantly enhanced on addition of CuCl to the reaction mixture is also very well in line with this dissociative mechanism [11] Cu(I) is known to trap phosphines and its presence may therefore lead to a higher concentration of the catalytically active monophosphine metal fragments F and G in solution. 

In addition to ruthenium, Tilley and coworkers also reported that cationic iridium silylenoid complexes were efficient olefin hydrosilation catalysts [reaction (7.6)].56 This silylene complex catalyzes the hydrosilation of unhindered mono- or disubsti-tuted olefins with primary silanes to produce secondary silanes with anti Markovni-kov selectivity. Iridium catalyst 32 exhibited reactivity patterns similar to those of ruthenium 30 only primary silanes were allowed as substrates. In contrast to 30, cationic iridium 32 catalyzed the redistribution of silanes. Exposing phenylsilane to 5 mol% of 32 in the absence of olefin produced diphenylsilane, phenylsilane, and silane. 

Addition of two tributylphosphine ligand equivalents per ruthenium did not significantly alter the reactivity pattern, but an excess (P/Ru = 5)... 

A second type of reactive metal-silicon bond involves multiple bonding, as might exist in a silylene complex, LnM=SiR2. The synthesis of isolable silylene complexes has led to the observation of new silicon-based reactivity patterns redistribution at silicon occurs via bi-molecular reactions of silylene complexes with osmium silylene complexes, reactions have been observed that mimic proposed transformations in the Direct Process. And, very recently, ruthenium silylene complexes have been reported to be catalytically active in hydrosilylation reactions. 

During the past few decades, a wide variety of molecules with transition metal-carhon mulhple bonds have been studied. The chemistry of doubly bonded species - carbenes - is particularly interesting because it leads to several synthetically important transformations, and for this reason, metal carbenes are the main subject of this chapter. Our discussion begins with a classification of metal-carbene complexes based on electronic structure, which provides a way to understand their reactivity patterns. Next, we summarize the mechanistic highlights of three metal-carbene-mediated reactions carbonyl olefinafion, olefin cyclopropanafion, and olefin metathesis. Throughout the second half of the chapter, we focus mainly on ruthenium-carbene olefin metathesis catalysts, in part because of widespread interest in the applications of these catalysts, and in part because of our expertise in this area. We conclude with some perspectives on the chemistry of metal carbenes and on future developments in catalysis. 

Due in large part to the development of ruthenium catalysts, olefin metathesis reactions can now be carried out on a diverse array of functionalized electron-rich and electron-poor olefins. As we have described, mechanistic analysis was instrumental in the design of more highly active second generation catalysts with expanded substrate scope, which was achieved by proper differentiation of the two L-type ligands within the (L)2(X)2Ru=CHR framework. Further investigations have revealed that these new catalysts display several unexpected features, and mechanistic analysis continues to be an invaluable tool for understanding reactivity patterns and for the development of new catalyst systems. 

The protonated ruthenium species are more reactive than [Ru(CN)6] ", which indicates the importance of in the Mn(VII)/(VI) conversion with poor reducing agents. The reactivity pattern is similar to but slower than the corresponding [Fe(CN)6] system. >... 

While palladium, ruthenium, and rhodium are the most common metal catalysts used to facilitate Alder-ene cyclization, a few successful examples of catalysis using different metals have been published. Both of the references reviewed in this section demonstrate chemistry that is novel and complimentary to the patterns of reactivity exhibited by late transition metals in the Alder-ene cyclization. 

Ru(edta)(H20)] reacts very rapidly with nitric oxide (171). Reaction is much more rapid at pH 5 than at low and high pHs. The pH/rate profile for this reaction is very similar to those established earlier for reaction of this ruthenium(III) complex with azide and with dimethylthiourea. Such behavior may be interpreted in terms of the protonation equilibria between [Ru(edtaH)(H20)], [Ru(edta)(H20)], and [Ru(edta)(OH)]2- the [Ru(edta)(H20)] species is always the most reactive. The apparent relative slowness of the reaction of [Ru(edta)(H20)] with nitric oxide in acetate buffer is attributable to rapid formation of less reactive [Ru(edta)(OAc)] [Ru(edta)(H20)] also reacts relatively slowly with nitrite. Laser flash photolysis studies of [Ru(edta)(NO)]-show a complicated kinetic pattern, from which it is possible to extract activation parameters both for dissociation of this complex and for its formation from [Ru(edta)(H20)] . Values of AS = —76 J K-1 mol-1 and A V = —12.8 cm3 mol-1 for the latter are compatible with AS values between —76 and —107 J K-1mol-1 and AV values between —7 and —12 cm3 mol-1 for other complex-formation reactions of [Ru(edta) (H20)]- (168) and with an associative mechanism. In contrast, activation parameters for dissociation of [Ru(edta)(NO)] (AS = —4JK-1mol-1 A V = +10 cm3 mol-1) suggest a dissociative interchange mechanism (172). 

In order to parallel solution-phase reactivity and ion-molecule reactions in the gas phase, the reactivity of a typical homogeneous catalyst, described earlier by Grubbs and co-workers [128], was studied by ESMS [129]. Electrospray of the dichloride salt of 15 and increasing the collisional activation potential first yielded predominantly the monocation 16, but with raising the tube lens potential even higher the intensity of 16 decreased due to loss of the second phosphine ligand, loss of trimethylamine, and loss of HCl. The observed fragmentation pattern was consistent with the assumed structure of the ruthenium complex. 

Limitations of the reaction due to the substitution pattern of the allylic alcohols were overcome by the use of tetrapropylammonium perruthenate (TRAP) as a catalyst and monosubstituted, disubstituted and trisubstituted allyl alcohols were converted into the corresponding saturated aldehydes and ketones [5]. Intermediacy of the ruthenium alkoxide in this reaction was evidenced from the complete lack of reactivity of the trimethylsilyl ether derived from the allylic alcohol. 

Reactivities in ROMP, RCM and RO/CM of different Ru-based catalysts are very dependent on the the substitution pattern of the ruthenium center and the monomer type. 

---