Ruthenium methylidene complex

The mechanistic investigations presented in this section have stimulated research directed to the development of advanced ruthenium precatalysts for olefin metathesis. It was pointed out by Grubbs et al. that the utility of a catalyst is determined by the ratio of catalysis to the rate of decomposition [31]. The decomposition of ruthenium methylidene complexes, which attribute to approximately 95% of the turnover, proceeds monomolecularly, which explains the commonly observed problem that slowly reacting substrates require high catalyst loadings [31]. This problem has been addressed by the development of a novel class of ruthenium precatalysts, the so-called second-generation catalysts. 

In a formal sense, complexes 1 represent pre-catalysts that convert in the first turn of the catalytic cycle (vide infra) into ruthenium methylidene species of type 3 which are believed to be the actual propagating species in solution (Schemes 2,4). The ease of formation of 3 strongly depends on the electronic properties of the original carbene moiety in 1. In addition to complexes la-c with R1=CH=CPh2, ruthenium carbenes with Rx=aryl (e.g. Id, Scheme 3) constitute another class of excellent metathesis pre-catalysts, which afford the methylidene complex 3 after an even shorter induction period [5]. In contrast, any kind of electron-withdrawing (e.g. -COOR) or electron-donating substitu-... 

Since the vinylcarbenes la-c and the aryl substituted carbene (pre)catalyst Id, in the first turn of the catalytic cycle, both afford methylidene complex 3 as the propagating species in solution, their application profiles are essentially identical. Differences in the rate of initiation are relevant in polymerization reactions, but are of minor importance for RCM to which this chapter is confined. Moreover, the close relationship between 1 and the ruthenium allenylidene complexes 2 mentioned above suggests that the scope and limitations of these latter catalysts will also be quite similar. Although this aspect merits further investigations, the data compiled in Table 1 clearly support this view. 

The reaction rate of enyne 107j having a terminal alkyne is very slow, and the starting material is recovered [Eq. (6.80)]. ° Presumably, the terminal alkene of the product 108j should further react with ruthenium carbene complex Ih to form XVII, whose ruthenium carbene should be coordinated by the olefin in the pyrrolidine ring. Thus, the catalytic activity of Ih should be decreased. If complex XVII reacts with ethylene, 108j and methylidene ruthenium carbene complex Ih should be regenerated. On the basis of this idea, the reaction was carried out under ethylene... 

Cross-metathesis of terminal alkyne 142 and cyclopentene gives cyclic compound 143 having a diene moiety [Eq. (6.114)]. ° Terminal ruthenium carbene generated from an alkyne and methylidene ruthenium carbene complex reacts with cyclopentene to afford two-carbon elongated cycloheptadiene 143 ... 

In conclusion, the disappearance of the benzylidene fragment during the ATRP of methyl methacrylate could be explained by the reaction of the ruthenium benzylidene with the monomer, giving rise to highly unstable ruthenium ester-carbene complexes, and it is possible that these species then quickly decompose. In addition, the absence of [Ru=CH2] is also most probably indicative of the decomposition of these ruthenium carbene species, since [Ru=CH2] are presumed to be the propagating species in RCM and related ruthenium methylidene derivatives have a quite long lifetime in olefin metathesis. Until now, the exact nature of the inorganic decomposition products is not known. 

Stoichiometric reactions of the Grubbs catalyst with vinylsilanes give predominantly silylstyrene and ruthenium methylidene but traces of styrene derived from the opposite regioselectivity was also detected. Unfortunately, ruthenium silylcarbene complex was not detected, equations 19a and 19b. 

Studies of catalyst decomposition in the presence of substrate have mostly focused on ethylene. In particular, it has been demonstrated that ethylene can induce the degradation of methylidene complex 19 to produce propylene as the main volatile organic byproduct [3, 39]. The proposed mechanism for this degradation involves the ruthenacyclobutane intermediate (20) undergoing a P-hydride elimination to form a ruthenium allyl-hydride species (21), which subsequently affords the propylene complex (22) upon reductive elimination (Scheme 11.8). 

Although the molybdenum and ruthenium complexes 1-3 have gained widespread popularity as initiators of RCM, the cydopentadienyl titanium derivative 93 (Tebbe reagent) [28,29] can also be used to promote olefin metathesis processes (Scheme 13) [28]. In a stoichiometric sense, 93 can be also used to promote the conversion of carbonyls into olefins [28b, 29]. Both transformations are thought to proceed via the reactive titanocene methylidene 94, which is released from the Tebbe reagent 93 on treatment with base. Subsequent reaction of 94 with olefins produces metallacyclobutanes 95 and 97. Isolation of these adducts, and extensive kinetic and labeling studies, have aided in the eluddation of the mechanism of metathesis processes [28]. 

---