Routes of Exposure to Toxic Agents

Box 4.1 Classification of the routes of exposure to toxic agents Classification of exposures to toxic agents... 

Of the various means of body exposure to toxic agents, skin contact is first in the number of affections-occupationally related. Intake by inhalation ranks second, while oral intake is generally of minor importance except as it becomes a part of the intake by inhalation or when an exceptionally toxic agent is involved. For some materials, as might be inferred, there are multiple routes of entry. 

Another difficulty comes from the consideration of the route of entry (sf the contaminant, as chemicals can enter the body by various routes and the human body responds to the action of a toxic agent primarily on the basis of the rate and route of exposure. Without any doubt, the most important route of exposure at the workplace is inhalation, and this should be the route used to set OELs. However, if there is a threat of significant exposure by other routes, such as cutaneously (including mucous membranes and the eyes), either by contact with vapors or by direct skin contact w ith the substance, additional recommendations may be necessary. 

DF and its precursor, DC are organophosphonic acids. They will react with alcohols to form crude lethal nerve agents, such as crude GB. High overexposure may cause inhibition of cholinesterase activity. Although much less toxic than GB, DF and DC are toxic and corrosive materials. Because DF and DC are relatively volatile compounds, the primary route of exposure is expected to be the respiratory system. However, ingestion also results from inhalation exposures in animals and could occur in humans. DF and DC vapors have a pungent odor and may cause severe and painful irritation of the eyes, nose, throat, and lungs. Data provided is for DF only, DC has similar properties. 

Refinements of the RfC have utilized mechanistic data to modify the interspecies uncertainty factor of 10 (Jarabek, 1995). The reader should appreciate that with the inhalation route of exposure, dosimetric adjustments are necessary and can affect the extrapolations of toxicity data of inhaled agents for human health risk assessment. The EPA has included dosimetry modeling in RfC calculations, and the resulting dosimetric adjustment factor (DAF) used in determining the RfC is dependent on physiochemical properties of the inhaled toxicant as well as type of dosimetry model ranging from rudimentary to optimal model structures. In essence, the use of the DAF can reduce the default uncertainty factor for interspecies extrapolation from 10 to 3.16. 

---