Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Rough boundary conditions

To prove that equation (A3.11.13 gives a wavepacket which satisfies the desired boundary conditions, we note that substitution of equation (3.11.13 into equation (A3.ll.il) gives us two wavepackets which roughly speaking are given by... [Pg.961]

The criterion for the validity of Equation 8-141 is Npg 1.0. A rough rule-of-thumb is Npg > 10. If this condition is not satisfied, the correct equation depends on the boundary conditions at the inlet and outlet. A procedure for determining dispersion coefficient Dg [ is as follows ... [Pg.739]

It is noteworthy that several studies exhibit contradictory results for both the mechanical and thermal characteristics of the flow. This is generally due to differences in the many parameters that characterize these studies such as the geometry, shape and surface roughness of the channels, the fluid, the boundary conditions and the measuring methodology itself. These discrepancies indicate the need for extension of the experimental base to provide the necessary background to the theoretical model. [Pg.82]

As we shall see in the present chapter, it is generally the sitoation that a number of specific surface properties govern boundary conditions, and these have been considered extensively in the literature. These include, but are not limited to, wettability and substrate-liquid affinity [1-15], hydrodynamic shear rate [16-20], surface topology and roughness [21-29], and surface material properties [30-36]. [Pg.62]

This result can be extended to the case of variable boundary conditions and also to the case of two or more independent variables. Roughly speaking, the perturbation is regular provided the region of the variables is bounded and the coefficients of the differential equation and their derivatives are continuous in the closed region. [Pg.24]

Figure 20.7 Overall air-water transfer velocity vla/w as a function of Henry s Law coefficient for two very different wind conditions, 10 = 1 m s l (calm overland condition) and Kl0 = 20 m s 1 (rough ocean conditions). The solid lines are calculated for average compound properties Diz = 0.1 cm2 s 1 and Sc,w = 600. The dashed line indicates the boundary between air-phase- and water-phase-controlled transfer velocities. See Table 20.5 for definitions of parameters and substances. Figure 20.7 Overall air-water transfer velocity vla/w as a function of Henry s Law coefficient for two very different wind conditions, 10 = 1 m s l (calm overland condition) and Kl0 = 20 m s 1 (rough ocean conditions). The solid lines are calculated for average compound properties Diz = 0.1 cm2 s 1 and Sc,w = 600. The dashed line indicates the boundary between air-phase- and water-phase-controlled transfer velocities. See Table 20.5 for definitions of parameters and substances.
The smoothing of a rough isotropic surface such as illustrated in Fig. 3.7 due to vacancy flow follows from Eq. 3.69 and the boundary conditions imposed on the vacancy concentration at the surface.12 In general, the surface acts as an efficient source or sink for vacancies and the equilibrium vacancy concentration will be maintained in its vicinity. The boundary condition on cy at the surface will therefore correspond to the local equilibrium concentration. Alternatively, if cy, and therefore Xy, do not vary significantly throughout the crystal, smoothing can be modeled using the diffusion potential and Eq. 3.72 subject to the boundary conditions on a at the surface and in the bulk.13... [Pg.60]

In a recent work [69], we were able to reveal that the sharkskin merely originates from a local interfacial instability of the boundary condition near the die exit wall. Specifically, the oscillation of adsorbed chains between their coil and stretch states produces a small scale periodic perturbation on the overall die swell and makes the extrudate surface appear rough or sharkskin like. [Pg.264]

Until we discovered the constancy of the surface potential from the uniaxial stress results, like most other people, I had been more interested in constant surface charge models. If you do not know how the valency of a macroion varies with the external conditions, it is reasonable to assume it to be constant unless given evidence to the contrary. Given the evidence that y/0 70 mV is roughly constant for the n-butylammonium vermiculite system, what other consequences follow from this In particular, what happens if we apply the coulombic attraction theory with the constant surface potential boundary condition ... [Pg.57]


See other pages where Rough boundary conditions is mentioned: [Pg.128]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.680]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.353]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.128 ]




SEARCH



Rough boundary

© 2024 chempedia.info