Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Risk assessment probability theory

Therefore, Part I of this text focused primarily on the development of system safety, its military connections, the importance of including system safety requirements in contract acquisitions, the criticality of obtaining management commitment in support of the system safety effort, the process of risk analysis and assessment, probability theory and statistical analysis as they relate to system safety, and— perhaps of most value— how the fundamental principles of system safety are closely related to those of occupational safety and health management. [Pg.183]

ProbahUistic Risk Assessment (PRA) A commonly used term in the nuclear industry to describe the quantitative evaluation of risk using probability theory. [Pg.314]

The topic of eliciting probability distributions that are based purely on judgment (professional or otherwise) is discussed in texts on risk assessment (e.g., Moore 1983 Vose 2000) and decision theory or Bayesian methodology (e.g., Berger 1985). Elicitation methods may be considered with ID models in case no data are available for htting a model. In the 2D situation, elicitation may be used for the parameter uncertainty distribntions. In that situation, it may happen that no kind of relative fre-qnency data wonld be relevant, simply because the distributions represent subjective uncertainty and not relative frequency. [Pg.49]

Probability theory is, of conrse, designed precisely to estimate these chances. Becanse of this, probabilistic assessment is regarded by many as the heir apparent to worst case analysis. However, traditional applications of probability theory also have some severe limitations. As it is used in risk assessments today, probability theory... [Pg.91]

The thermal risk linked to a chemical reaction is the risk of loss of control of the reaction and associated consequences (e.g. triggering a runaway reaction). Therefore, it is necessary to understand how a reaction can switch from its normal course to a runaway condition. In order to make this assessment, the theory of thermal explosion (see Chapter 2) needs to be understood, along with the concepts of risk assessment. This implies that an incident scenario was identified and described, with its triggering conditions and the resulting consequences, in order to assess the severity and probability of occurrence. For thermal risks, the worst case will be to lose the cooling of a reactor or in general to consider that the reaction mass or the substance to be assessed is submitted to adiabatic conditions. Hence, we consider a cooling failure scenario. [Pg.60]

Whenever appropriate, and in line with the probabilistic concept of risk, probability distributions are used in ecological risk assessment of mixtures. This applies to the assessment of exposure (e.g., the probabilistic application of multimedia fate models see Hertwich et al. 1999 Ragas et al. 1999 MacLeod et al. 2002), as well as to the assessment of effects, especially the SSD approach. Recent developments (both conceptually and practically) suggest that joint probability assessments (looking at exposure and effects distributions simultaneously) are applied more frequently. This relates to the refined questions being posed, but also to theory development (e.g., Aldenberg et al. 2002) and technical facilitation by software (e.g., Van Vlaardingen et al. 2004). [Pg.181]

For certain types of toxic effea, notably cancer, some scientists believe that there is no threshold, and that the dose-effect graph would look like Graph A in Figure 29. As some chemicals cause cancer by reacting with the DNA molecule in cells, in theory one molecule of chemical would be enough to cause an effect. This notion probably arose from experiments with isolated cells exposed to radiation, but some regulatory authorities, in the USA for example, base their risk assessment of chemicals on this assumption. [Pg.299]

There is a reality in Browning s observations System safety literature at the time he wrote his book was loaded with governmental jargon, and it easily repelled the uninitiated. It made more of the highly complex hazard analysis and risk assessment techniques requiring extensive knowledge of mathematics and probability theory than it did of concepts and purposes. [Pg.421]

Zhang, R, Zhou, Y., Liao, T., Research on quantitative risk assessment model and failure probability of oil/gas pipeline based on dempster-shafer evidence and intuitionist fuzzy theory. Proceedings of the International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering, 2013, pp. 145-150. [Pg.203]

Statistical assessment of time to failure is a basic topic in reliability engineering for which many mathematical tools have been developed. Evans, who also pioneered the mixed potential theory to explain basic corrosion kinetics, launched the concept of corrosion probability in relation to localized corrosion. According to Evans, an exact knowledge of corrosion rate was less important than the ascertainment of the statistical risk of its initiation [12]. The following examples illustrate the application of empirical modeling in two areas of high criticality. [Pg.94]


See other pages where Risk assessment probability theory is mentioned: [Pg.1]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.1522]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.1474]    [Pg.1550]    [Pg.1684]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.2131]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.1198]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.63 ]




SEARCH



Probability theory

Risk probability

© 2024 chempedia.info