Review input

Case I is the desired model result all constraints are met, no relaxation is required. The model is solved and all value and volume results are processed and communicated to the planner. Case II requires relaxation to make the model feasible. Planning results do not represent a solution that is desired in reality, profit results are meaningless due to the relaxation penalties withdrawn from the objective value. Hence, the planner does not get the planning results but the list of relaxation cases that occurred. The list enables the planner to review input and control data of the specific constraint. Case III occurs, if the model is infeasible due to the constraints that have no relaxation variables. This case is the most difficult one for the planner to solve. A theoretical solution would be to relax all hard constraints an 80-20-solution in practice is to use relaxation only for the infeasibility cases occurring most often. In practice, these cases can be... 

Management reviews are conducted based on the review inputs and any decisions and actions taken as a result of the management review are the review output . The information taken as input to the management reviews could be the results from audits and self-assessment of the laboratory, feedback from customers and results from benchmarking activities, the laboratory activity performance, the status of corrective and preventive action... 

The management reviews are conducted with a planned agenda to provide direction for the company s quality operations. Input from outside and inside sources are welcome to ensure continuous improvement. The audit findings and areas of quality concern are discussed. It is ensured that corrective and preventive measures are taken on time. The review input includes statistical evaluation of process performance and product conformity. 

To obtain peer/opinion leader review input... 

---