Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Restricted Hartree-Fock formalism

However, it is clear from the UPS of Co(CO)3NO and Fe(CO)2(NO)2 that some overlapping of bands must occur because fewer ionizations are detected than predicted. In an effort to provide a more definitive basis for spectral assignment, ab initio MO carried out on the ground states of these molecules (177, 180). The energies of the lower lying ionic states have also been computed within the restricted Hartree—Fock formalism (177), thus affording direct calculations of... [Pg.115]

Horsley et a/.164 have determined a reaction pathway for the geometrical isomerization of cyclopropane by a calculation and search of the full 21-dimensional hypersurface The calculations were performed using a minimal basis set of STO s in a modified SCF calculation using the restricted Hartree-Fock formalism suggested by Nesbet.165 In the region of the trimethylene diradical, a 3 x 3 configuration interaction calculation was included. [Pg.35]

Theoretical Results. To solve the open-shell problem, various MO methods have been applied and, in some cases, compared with each other. Most commonly, the restricted Hartree-Fock formalism for the open-shell case (RHF) [15] and the unrestricted Hartree-Fock formalism before (UHF) [16] and after single spin annihilation (UHFASA) [17] have been used besides other methods, see [18 to 21] and footnote of Table 6, p. 234. [Pg.233]

There are three restrictions that are normally incorporated into Hartree-Fock calculations, and a fourth often appears when the Hartree-Fock formalism is used to parametrize the experimental results. (1) The spacial part of a one-electron wave function pi is assumed to be separable into a radial and an angular part, so that = r lUi(r)Si(e,)Si(a) where Si(a) is a spin function with spin... [Pg.352]

The few attempts at describing excited states in transition metal complexes within the restricted Hartree Fock (RHF) formalism were rapidly abandoned because of computational difficulties (convergence of the low-lying states in the open-shell formalism) and theoretical deficiencies (inherent lack... [Pg.3810]

Up to now most quantum mechanical studies of the ground and excited states of model heme complexes have focused primarily on diamagnetic systems (36), with less frequent treatment of heme systems with unpaired spins (37-42). With the inclusion of a restricted Hartree-Fock treatment (37, 38) within an INDO formalism parameterized for transition metals (39, 40, ), it is now possible to calculate the relative energies of different spin states of ferric heme complexes in an evenhanded fashion at a semiempirical level. [Pg.340]

Carsky, R, Hubac, I., and Staenamler, V., Correlation energies in open shell systems. Comparison ofCEPA, PNO—Cl, and perturbation treatments based on the restricted Roothaan-Hartree-Fock formalism, Theor. Chim. Acta 60, 445—450 (1982). [Pg.41]

I. Hubac and P. Carsky, Phys. Rev., All, 2392 (1980). Correlation Energy of Open-Shell Systems. Application of the Many-Body Rayleigh-Schrodinger Perturbation Theory in the Restricted Roothaan-Hartree-Fock Formalism. [Pg.131]

The original procedure (Miertus et al., 1981) was expressed in the restricted Hartree-Fock (HF) formalism. Extensions to other levels of the quantum theory are easy, and there are versions of the PCM program accepting UHF, ROHF, MPn, CASSCF, SDCI, MRCI, and CASSCF-CI levels of quantum molecular theory. The extension to semiempirical quantum methods has been elaborated by several groups. We quote here Miertus et al. (1988) for CNDO methods, and Luque and Orozco (Luque et al., 1993 1995 Negre et al., 1992) for PM3 and AMI version. Both of them follow this approach. The computational codes are of public domain. The PM3 version has been included in MOPAC package (Stewart, 1990). [Pg.32]

The formal justification of this expansion form is analogous to that given by Hurley, Lennard-Jones and Pople in the development of a correlated-pair extension of the closed-shell restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) wavefunction. [Pg.139]

The few attempts at describing excited states in transition metal complexes within the Restricted Hartree Fock (RHF) formalism were rapidly abandoned due to the computational difficulties (convergence of the low-lying states in the open-shell formalism) and theoretical deficiencies (inherent lack of electronic correlation, inconsistent treatment of states of different multiplicities and d shell occupations). The simplest and most straightforward method to deal with correlation energy errors is the Configuration Interaction (Cl) approach where the single determinant HF wave function is extended to a wave function composed of a linear combination of many de-... [Pg.128]

The alternative to the development of new algorithms to handle relativistic Hamiltonians is to search for a way to extend non-relativistic algorithms such that they can handle the additional couplings. Since most implementations are based on a restricted Hartree-Fock scheme the first step is to mimic the spin-restricted excitation operators used in the non-relativistic methods by Kramers restricted excitation operators. This can be done by employing the so-called X-operator formalism [37]. [Pg.319]

So fiir in this chapter we have discussed the Hartree-Fock equations from a formal point of view in terms of a general set of spin orbitals xj. We are now in a position to consider the actual calculation of Hartree-Fock wave functions, and we must be more specific about the form of the spin orbitals. In the last chapter we briefly discussed two types of spin orbitals restricted spin orbitals, which are constrained to have the same spatial function for a (spin up) and jS (spin down) spin functions and unrestricted spin orbitals, which have different spatial functions for a and P spins. Later in this chapter we will discuss the unrestricted Hartree-Fock formalism and unrestricted calculations. In this section we are concerned with procedures for calculating restricted Hartree-Fock wave functions and, specifically, we consider here... [Pg.131]

Recently, an ab initio 6-31 G basis set calculation reaffirmed that phenol is significantly more stable than both 2,4- and 2,5-cyclohexadienone. Total electronic energies at 0 K and thermodynamic parameters were calculated for phenol, 2,4-cyclohexa-dienone, and 2,5-cyclohexadienone. Energy calculations were performed using the restricted Hartree— Fock (RHF) and second-order Moller—Plesset formalisms on the RHF optimized geometries. The study has shown the following (i) phenol is more stable than the two ketones by around 18 kcal/mol (ii) the ketone with the C-sp para to the carbonyl is slightly less stable than the one with the C-sp ortho to the carbonyl (iii) thermodynamic data calculated for the ketones versus the enol forms for the three species confirm the already known fact that phenol is more stable in the enolic form (Scheme 16). [Pg.7]

The coefficients c i are given by the solution of the corresponding SCF equation (equation 2). d s the diagonal matrix with the MO energies. For consideration of Cl we must distinguish between closed-shell systems and open-shell systems. For closed-shell systems the restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) formalism is applied, whereas for open-shell systems one has the choice between the unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) or the restricted open-shell formalism (ROHF). The Fock matrix elements were formulated on the CNDO, INDO and NDDO level by Sauer et al. ... [Pg.508]

Figure 5-1. H2 potential curves computed within the restricted and unrestricted Hartree-Fock (RHF and UHF) and Kohn-Sham (RKS and UKS) formalisms. [Pg.71]

We shall now follow the unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) formalism to obtain a restricted high-spin open-shell functions as proposed in [34], [35]. In order to eliminate spin contamination in the UHF function f i, the following spin purity constraint is imposed on the spatial orbitals ... [Pg.114]


See other pages where Restricted Hartree-Fock formalism is mentioned: [Pg.74]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.2665]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.17]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.508 ]




SEARCH



Hartree restricted

Hartree-Fock formalism

© 2024 chempedia.info