Representation Theory of so

In order to apply the representation theory of so(2,1) to physical problems we need to obtain realizations of the so(2, 1) generators in either coordinate or momentum space. For our purposes the realizations in three-dimensional coordinate space are more suitable so we shall only consider them (for N-dimensional realizations, see Cizek and Paldus, 1977, and references therein). First we shall show how to build realizations in terms of the radial distance and momentum operators, r, pr. These realizations are sufficiently general to express the radial parts of the Hamiltonians we shall consider linearly in the so(2,1) generators. Then we shall obtain the corresponding realizations of the so(2,1) unirreps which are bounded from below. The basis functions of the representation space are simply related to associated Laguerre polynomials. For finding the eigenvalue spectra it is not essential to obtain these explicit realizations of the basis functions, since all matrix elements can... 

In a similar manner we can show that the generators T, and T3 are Hermitian with respect to the same scalar product, Eq. (79). Only the generator T3 has square integrable eigenfunctions and this is the reason why we chose to diagonalize T2 and T3 in our study of the representation theory of so(2, 1) (the notation J2, J3 was used in Section III). 

The representation theory of so(4,1) is considerably more involved than for so(4), so we shall not present the details here (see, e.g., Strom, 1965 Kihlberg and Strom, 1965 Bohm, 1966 Vitale, 1968). We need only the following results. 

We shall not consider the general representation theory of so(4, 2) (Barut and Bohm, 1970). It is clear from our construction of the hydrogenic realization that we have all bound-state hydrogenic eigenfunctions within a single unirrep of so(4, 2), since this is true for the subalgebra so(4, 1). We only note that there are three independent Casimir operators for so(4, 2) given by the rather complicated expressions (see, e.g., Barut, 1971, p. 45)... 

For a systematic group-theoretical study of chirality functions the chemist requires a knowledge of the representation theory of symmetric and hyperoctahedral groups, and of the concept of induced representations and their properties. While excellent expositions of these topics are to be found in the mathematical literature, they are usually formulated in an idiom foreign to the chemist and are thus relatively inaccessible to him. As the present article is an attempt to bridge this mathematical gap, the theory is presented as far as possible in a unified form so as to include the cases of both achiral and chiral ligands. 

In this section we shall present a simple unified approach to the matrix representation theory of the so(2,1) and so(3) Lie algebras (Barut and Fronsdal, 1965 Barut, 1971 Wybourne, 1974 Barut and Raczka, 1977). These Lie algebras have a similar structure and the general representation theory for both are closely related. However, when we specialize to the unitary representations by requiring that the generators be Hermitian, so(2, 1) and... 

JT systems with strong coupling, and some efficient approaches have been formulated in the theory of so-called non-rigid molecules. The triangular molecule has two normal vibrational coordinates that span two irreducible representations, Ai and 5i. The normal vibrational modes Qb and = qAi of the FeNO fragment... 

I think Tye s theory of representation has some important virtues, but I prefer views like those of Millikan (1984) and Dretske (1986), according to which the contents of visual representations are part of our biological endowment, having been fixed by evolutionary processes in the remote past. So, 1 wish to ask if this is indeed the right way to think about visual contents, is Swampman a counterexample to representational theories of qualitative visual awareness It is clear that if a biological of visual content is correct, and we accept a representational theory of qualitative awareness, then Swampman cannot be said to be aware of qualia. It is also clear that this result conflicts with an intuition we can clearly and distinctly conceive of Swampman, and because of this, we have a vivid impression that Swampman is objectively possible. Should this conflict lead us to reject representational theories ... 

However, we should note that this representation does not contain information about the distances of neighbours. In fact, p(r) represented this way is the projection of the positions of neighbouring atoms onto the unit sphere. The properties of functions defined on the unit sphere are described by the group theory of SO(3), the group of rotations about the origin. 

It follows from the representation theory of groups that the direct product of two irreducible representations can be decomposed into direct sum of irreducible representations of the same group. In case of the SO(3) group, the direct product of two Wigner-matrices can be decomposed into a direct sum of Wigner-matrices in the form... 

The sub-micro level is real, but is not visible and so it can be difficult to comprehend. As Kozma and Russell (1997) point out, understanding chemistry relies on making sense of the invisible and the untouchable (p. 949). Explaining chemical reactions demands that a mental picture is developed to represent the sub-micro particles in the substances being observed. Chemical diagrams are one form of representation that contributes to a mental model. It is not yet possible to see how the atoms interact, thus the chemist relies on the atomic theory of matter on which the sub-micro level is based. This is presented diagrammatically in Fig. 8.2. The links from the sub-micro level to the theory and representational level is shown with the dotted line. 

The technology for solving the Schrddinger equation is so much farther advanced in r space than in p space that it is most practical to obtain the momentum-space from its position-space counterpart The transformation theories of Dirac [118,119] and Jordan [120,121] provide the hnk between these representations ... 

We demonstrated that by the selection of a representation of the Dirac Hamiltonian in the spinor space one may strongly influence the performance of the variational principle. In a vast majority of implementations the standard Pauli representation has been used. Consequently, computational algorithms developed in relativistic theory of many-electron systems have been constructed so that they are applicable in this representation only. The conditions, under which the results of these implementations are reliable, are very well understood and efficient numerical codes are available for both atomic and molecular calculations (see e.g. [16]). However, the representation of Weyl, if the external potential is non-spherical, or the representation of Biedenharn, in spherically-symmetric cases, seem to be attractive and, so far, hardly explored options. 

The existence of eigenvalues for linear transformations is what makes representation theory so much more powerful than abstract group theory. Rep-... 

Proposition 6.11 implies that irreducible representations are the identifiable basic building blocks of all finite-dimensional representations of compact groups. These results can be generalized to infinite-dimensional representations of compact groups. The main difficulty is not with the representation theory, but rather with linear operators on infinite-dimensional vector spaces. Readers interested in the mathematical details ( dense subspaces and so on) should consult a book on functional analysis, such as Reed and Simon [RS],... 

The results of this section are another confirmation of the philosophy spelled out in Section 6.2. We expect that the irreducible representations of the symmetry group determined by equivalent observers should correspond to the elementary systems. In fact, the experimentally observed spin properties of elementary particles correspond to irreducible projective unitary representations of the Lie group SO(3). Once again, we see that representation theory makes a testable physical prediction. 

It is with the representation of chemical species by their so-called empirical formula (i.e. with no reference to structure) that we are here concerned. In such a representation ethyl alcohol is C2H60, and not C2H5OH or CH3CH2OH as more structured representations would have it. They will be referred to, where necessary, as representations of Class I. A formal theory of a simple structured representation has indeed been adumbrated [1,2], but it is not yet clear what the algebraic structure of the reaction system may be. 

---